During the time of the American Revolution the British Empire was at one of its strongest points. The Colonials consisted of professional soldiers as well as minutemen that had minimal training in comparison to arguably the strongest military power at the time. The Americans developed a unique, complex, and ultimately effective style of warfare to combat this supreme force. While there were many factors that led to the American victory we will look more specifically at the tactics, techniques, and procedures of the actual conduct of warfare they utilized. To better understand the Tactics and techniques utilized you must have an understanding of the time period this war was fought. Most militaries worldwide fought in line formations, usually …show more content…
They were ordinary everyday people who decided to take up arms and partake in the revolution. They were poorly trained and had a variety of weapons which lead to some unique problems. With poor training they were not able to hold their formations very well and broke easily. Thus they were easily repulsed on the battlefield and could not be relied on to hold their ground. The variety of weapons also meant they could not fire in unison due to the times required to reload separate weapons systems. It was a farmer with his hunting rifle or a blacksmith with his own personal shotgun the militias did not have military style weapons. Military weapons had bayonets that could be fixed and the weapons could still be fired. Due to the close proximity (50-100m) of engagements armies went to battle with the bayonet fixed in order to execute a quick charge on command from the officer. The militia still had bayonets but it had to plug into the barrel rendering the weapon itself obsolete as it could not be fired (Of Rocks, Trees, Rifles, and Militia.) A final note on the militia is they rarely had any outside support from Calvary or artillery and could not defeat a British unit that had those capabilities. With these factors the American forces utilized two primary techniques to combat the British forces; guerilla warfare and conventional …show more content…
As many of the colonial officers were former British officers this was what was known to them. The colonial army was well trained and well equipped for warfare. Also known as regulars the colonial army regularly did drills and were professional soldiers. This style of warfare was more costly in both personnel and material but it allowed the Americans to defeat the British and own the area compared to small hit and run style guerilla tactics. These battles were fought in large open fields in the style of warfare the British were accustomed to. Both sides would line up usually with the regular army at the center and militia on the flanks. This was done because the regular army was stronger and better disciplined, this is important because if the center is weak and breaks the force is now split. If the enemy can split the force then they are now fighting two smaller units which is much easier to defeat. Regular units also had artillery in support of them. While the Americans didn’t have artillery until the capture of Ft. Ticonderoga once they seized a few artillery pieces it wasn’t long until they were able to manufacture their own. (The Capture of Fort Ticonderoga) Artillery is a very important asset as it could cause mass casualties on the close knit formations utilized at the time. The goal of artillerymen was to fire the projectile so it would skip across the ground inflicting the greatest
The British soldiers outnumbered The American soldiers by a lot. The british had a ton of ammunition to fight. The americans had little ammunitions so that's how they new their chances of winning was very slim because the british had more supplies than they did. The Before the battle started The americans were warned that they were coming so they started preparing weeks in advance.
General Gage decided to conduct a frontal assault on the colonial positions because he under estimated the colonial position and their capabilities. If General Gage landed 1,100 Soldiers in the rear American position and established a base of fire, he could have utilized the other 1,100 soldiers to flank from Morton’s point. This tactic is commonly used today for most infantry units. Along with establishing a base of fire and a flanking maneuver, a report showed British Field Artillery used 12 pound balls for six pound guns. This failure drastically changed the artillery range and accuracy.
After all, they had more troops and they were better trained. There were many factors, though, that led to their defeat. Just like in the Revolutionary War, the British underestimated the Americans, and that was their main issue. Arrogance was a factor in this. Admiral Cochrane, for example, would not accept his men’s plan of how to move the barges from the bayou and instead wasted days executing his plan of how to do it (128).
Revolutionary Weapons Revolutionary weapons had a big part on everyone lives. They made the British soldiers stronger. The people of Boston didn 't have weapons like the soldiers did. But that didn 't stop the people of Boston. They wanted the soldiers out of their town.
The “battle” was the first American victory of the American Revolution. The lack of British intelligence capabilities like human intelligence, counterintelligence, Calvary Scouts and key assumptions analysis at Fort Ticonderoga, led
During the American Revolution in the Southern backcountry, there were several battles that served as turning points of the war. These battles outcomes relied on the use/knowledge of the land and weaponry of the opponents. The execution of this knowledge allowed for these simple battles in the South Carolina backcountry to turn into turning points of the entire revolutionary war in the colonies. In the Southern backcountry, the majority of the fighting forces was made up of militia.
Will L. 7D Dec, 2017 HOW THE AMERICANS WON THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR How did the scrub-like Americans defeat the strong, organized British army? The two main advantages that helped the colonists win the Revolutionary War were geography, and war tactics. The American Revolutionary War was a war fought on American soil between Britain and the thirteen colonies. The Royal army consisted of nearly 50,000 regular troops.
The corps or bands would help spot and tell what direction the enemy was and told them were to look or fire. During the American Revolution they use the fife and drum corps and played
the American Revolution, the most significant was the use of guerrilla warfare. Guerrilla warfare is a form of warfare fought by irregulars in which quick, small-scale actions against orthodox military are executed. The Continental Army’s use of this tactic, as well as their success with it, is prevalent throughout the war. Though large field battles were fought in the revolt, the Americans attempted to avoid such fights and used more of a “hit-and-run” methodology. In small groups, colonial soldiers would deteriorate British forces with quick, unexpected attacks.
In the Battle of Bunker Hill, even though the Colonists soldiers retreated in defeat it had it’s great effect on the British. This battle is the first and one of the most important battles during the Revolutionary war. The Revolutionary war was the war between the patriots and the British who both wanted America. The two Major Generals in this particular battle name’s were General Howe who fought for the Colonists and General Artemus Ward who of course commanded the British. But though the battle is named ‘The Battle of Bunker Hill’, it was actually fought at the base of Breed’s Hill.
The Colonies main generals being William Heath,Benjamin Lincoln, and George Washington. William Heath who fought in the Battle of Lexington and the Siege of Boston was a huge part of the American Revolution. As well as Benjamin Lincoln who Fought all over the United States from Massachusetts to Charleston he took part in many battles often
Most would say that the artillery we use for the Civil War isn 't distinct, but they really are, there are multiple uses for these mechanisms such as a longer barrel for a cannon for a longer range of fire, a twisted inside that would propel a dud across the battlefield, and a piece of machinery that could develop the equivalent of a massive bomb. Now, some might say that the navy only consists of a few cannons, and a couple of riflemen , but really they consist of much more than just that. The navy used a much more distinct type of weapon, they called it the Iron Smooth Bore. It is used for a much more long ranged attack.
In the first place, the British soldiers had great strengths in the American revolution,
The American Revolution set the background for the modern nation state as well as molding the modern Army. Both countries have many differences and similarities, ranging from the individuals fighting these wars to tactics and strategies they used to win. These countries shared the same idea of freedom and independence, the difference is they used different methods of accomplishing this goal. It’s difficult to pin point which country chose the best method, but we compare some of the facts and take a deeper look as to what was transpiring in both of these Revolutions. In the 18th Century the main problem the Army had was manpower.
The American militia men’s guerilla tactics proved affective. They put to use tactics they had learned in the Indian Wars; striking quickly from behind trees or fences, then vanishing into the forest. Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben helped turn the American soldiers into an impressive army. Having