ipl-logo

The Judge's Story: The Supreme Court Case

673 Words3 Pages

This story is about the Supreme Court’s decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme Court? After reviewing this video on the story of the Supreme Court’s decision, I noticed the women had to go through many tribulations to be heard. However, it was not good enough because they still did not avail. The women had brought together millions of women to show they all felt they were under paid. They felt they were being discriminated against because of their gender. They fought to get to the Supreme Court for 10 years. The Supreme Court’s judges did not come to a mutual agreement as one Judge felt they did not have sufficient evidence to win a case of its nature against Wal-Mart. Moving forward the decision was made that any woman making claims they are being discriminated …show more content…

In the story, two justices wrote differing opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of opinion have on the state of the law in America? A majority opinion is when one of the three appellate court judges’ records a collective decision and their reasons. These precedent valued decisions are used by attorneys in assisting their clients with advice on how to react in situations. Also it assist judges with making upcoming decisions due to the fact they have been in a situation with similar outcomes. A concurring opinion is when the majority of the judges agree on a decision but it is for a dissimilar reason. She or he would prepare a concurring opinion explaining how this outcome was decided. When a judge or judges disagree with the majority vote, they would at that time write a dissenting opinion. This opinion will include the reason why their conclusion is contrary to that of the majority’s opinion. A dissenting opinion can also be cited by attorneys aiming to change laws. An appellate judge can also submit a dissenting opinion to change a

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Working Poor Invisible In America By David Shipler

    1743 Words  | 7 Pages

    They have the facilities to help them out, but refused to offer any. In the Voice of Freedom textbook talks about women rights back in the 1920’s a the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution which proposed banning discrimination based on sex. The second wave of feminism hit and it was brought back in the 1970’s where the Senate passed Amendment on March 22, 1972. The Equal Rights Amendment was sent to the states for ratification, but fifteen states Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia didn’t ratify the Amendment before the deadline on June 30,

    Read More

  • The Case Of Pulido Vs. United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a 6-3 per curium opinion, the Supreme Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit inaccurately categorized the type of jury instructions in Mr. Pulido's case as "structural mistake." It reasoned that one instructional error arising in the context of multiple theories of guilt does not necessarily spoil all the jury's findings, which would entitle the convicted individual to automatic relief. Rather, the Court found that the jury instructions in Mr. Pulido's case should be evaluated by whether they caused a "substantial and injurious effect" upon the jury reaching its verdict. The Court vacated Mr. Pulido's conviction and remanded the case to the court of appeals for proceedings consistent with the decision. Justice John Paul Stevens dissented, joined by Justices David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

    Read More

  • Justice Brennan's Case: The Terry Vs. Ohio Case

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    After reviewing Justice Brennan’s dissenting opinion, I cannot agree with his argument that a conducting a protective sweep surpasses the purpose of the Terry v. Ohio decision. Justice Brennan agreed that a protective sweep was not a full-blown search, but it was much more intrusive than a limited pat down for weapons or the frisk of an automobile (Sifferlen, 1991). Also, Justice Brennan also stated he believed officers’ should possess probable cause to initiate a protective sweep of a home (Sifferlen, 1991). The Terry v. Ohio decision permits law enforcement officers to perform a pat down of the outer clothing, when the officer has reasonable suspicion to believe the subject he or she is dealing with, is armed and dangerous (Hall, 2015). The main purpose of Terry v. Ohio decision is to locate weapons that may be used to hurt the

    Read More

  • Summary Of The SNCC Position Of Women

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1964, the white women of SNCC started to speak out about the bias they faced while working for SNCC by anonymously writing the “SNCC Position Paper: Women in the Movement. " The authors used several examples of discrimination from day to day interactions, to promotions and more. For example there was a woman that worked for SNCC for two years in two different states and was a veteran in the group, but she was asked to do clerical work for others in her committee. Another example was when a new position was available, where both a man and women were equally qualified, the man received the organizational and leadership position while the woman was relegated to secretarial work. During meetings, women were often asked to take minutes, regardless

    Read More

  • Methods Of Women's Suffrage Movement

    216 Words  | 1 Pages

    The men eventually broke through the barriers and started to attack the women. There, many women were injured. Instead of helping, the police just walked away. Another method the women used was picket lines. The women went to the White House with picket signs.

    Read More

  • Women's Rights For Women In The Late 1950s And 60s

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    Numerous laws and Acts were passed that involved women’s rights and though the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was newly established, it became clear

    Read More

  • Social Reform Dbq

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    During this time period, progressive women, like Roosevelt honed in on factory reforms such as eliminating unsafe and unsanitary sweatshops. However, as an underdeveloped and underappreciated class, these women focused on their needs and that of children. For example, reformist Florence Kelley, leader of the National Consumers League who fought for laws safeguarding women and children in the workplace, won the Muller v. Oregon case in 1908 in which the Supreme Court agreed to the constitutionality of laws protecting women workers. This reform, although positive in the sense that it provided protection for women also came with future backlash. This verdict ultimately promoted the concept that women were weaker than men therefore discriminating against women and closing “male” jobs off to women workers.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Mayflower Compact Important

    495 Words  | 2 Pages

    Elizabeth Tilley Howland Scholarship Award Essay Catharine Knowles 2017 In government, precedence is key. Without the historic case of Roe v. Wade, each state would have different laws in regards to a woman 's choice. McCulloch v. Maryland handed down a decision based on the implied powers of the federal government. Marbury v. Madison set forth the precedent of Judicial Review, which now allows the supreme court to rule a law unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • The Lilly Ledbetter Case

    1233 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ledbetter fought and won the case being awarded $3.3 million. Only to have it reduced to around $300,000.00 by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court also voted 5-4 against Ledbetter, that she was not entitled the compensation because she filed her claim more than 180 days after receiving her first discriminating paycheck (Pickert 2009). The court then sent stated that this was an issue for Congress to “clear up”.

    Read More

  • Schenck V. United States: A Narrative Analysis

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    This is a very debatable auestion, thefore, it is an opinion. Despite the fact that the picture frequently speaks to unlawful discourse, "yelling flame in a swarmed theater" alludes to an obsolete lawful standard. At a certain point, the law criminalized such discourse, which made an "unmistakable and current harzard." Yet in 1969, for discourse to infringe upon the law, it can 't simply lead others to unsafe circumstances. It should specifically urge others to carry out particular criminal activities they could call their own.

    Read More

  • Lena Baker: First-Degree Murder Of Ernest B. Monk

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    It was definite that injustice was done solely based on her skin color and that she was a female. The court case dismissed the with no evidence provided to support

    Read More

  • Title IX: Women Involved In Sports

    1755 Words  | 8 Pages

    “These women activists provided a support system to encourage the implementation of women’s equity through the Title IX, the Women’s Educational Equity Act, and related legislation”(Aquila 7). These women were a major part of keeping the women held together through these tough times. Their support system was very bold and they stuck to their word. Another group of women were a big part in Title IX. “A group of women that year hastily formed the National Organization of Women or NOW, at a conference on women.

    Read More

  • Lilly Ledbetter Case Summary

    820 Words  | 4 Pages

    “From 1979 to 1998, Lilly Ledbetter worked as a supervisor at Goodyear’s plant in Gadsden, Alabama. Over the course of her career, her pay slipped when compared to the pay of men of equal experience and seniority. She sued the company, alleging pay discrimination on the basis of her gender under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Goodyear argued that the discriminatory act was the decision to pay her less, which took place many years ago and that therefore her lawsuit is too late. In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in Goodyear’s favor”, (Lilly M. Ledbetter, Petitioner V.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Justice Research Paper

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Courts job is not to correct the errors of other courts but to resolve substantial legal issues. The courts own guidelines say there must be "compelling reasons" for accepting a case. When the supreme court accepts a case the majority of the justices disagree with the rulings made in the lower courts. The courts then make a decision indicating which party won the case.

    Read More

  • Brennan Vs Renanquist Analysis

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    Peter Irons’ Brennan vs. Rehnquist discusses the philosophical differences between Supreme Court Justices William Brennan and William Rehnquist, but on a deeper level, the importance of having a balance of ideas within the Judiciary Branch. Brennan’s ideology, as a lawyer and judge, tended to be more progressive by focusing on the dignity of all people. However, Rehnquist had conservative proclivity and believed that whoever held the majority should subject their own morals upon those in the minority, which is directly at odds with the beliefs of his more liberal counterpart. The author also states that the members of the Supreme Court are selected by publicly elected officials, meaning that the general population of voters hold an important

    Read More

More about The Judge's Story: The Supreme Court Case

Open Document