Rule breaking, leads to rulemaking. But to break an established rule in any artform hinges on the author's intent; to do it out of ignorance or laziness just results in sloppy work. To effectively break the rules, it’s necessary to learn them, acknowledge them, and then go on without them. John Huston’s The Maltese Falcon (1941) is the perfect example of this. Huston makes use of the tools in classical Hollywood narration to create a visually and technically mediocre film, but manipulates and bends those same tools to profoundly enhance storytelling and character development. The Maltese Falcon takes advantage of the continuity system to make each cut leave a lasting impact and push the plot forward. The film, while not devoid of cuts, makes …show more content…
In contrast, The Maltese Falcon uses this omniscience sparingly when showing characters’ true feelings about their own and each other’s actions. Characters lie and act deceitful towards each other as they pursue their own goals throughout the film. However, the viewer isn’t in on the truth when they hear a lie, or even know if what is spoken is truth or lie. For example, Spade seems to be playing on both Gutman and O'Shaughnessy’s side throughout the movie. In this case, the film has a limited narrator. It shows viewers all of these exchanges but does not offer a definitive goal for Spade. Instead, Huston has put the viewer in charge of determining Spade’s character, and does not spoon feed it through this narrator. However Huston does not ignore the ability to show temporarily irrelevant information visually in order to set up a future scene. While the narrator does not know the individual intentions of the characters, it does have a clear awareness of future events shown in the film. For example, when Spade and Gutman are first introduced in the hotel room, the camera lingers away from our protagonist and antagonist to show Wilmer sullenly shuffle into a back room. Initially this shot is peculiar as it adds no value to the scene up front. However, it sets context for an important reveal for later in the film. When Cairo is shown to be working for Gutman, he emerges from the previously alluded door. The viewer takes his hiding spot at face value because it’s already been presented, even if it’s likely to have been consciously forgotten. Another tool of classical Hollywood narration has been first acknowledged and then manipulated, in this case reigned in, to make a more engaging conflict that the viewer must decipher for
A true classic should be able to stand the test of time, and still be relatable to readers. The Maltese Falcon was written in the 1920's, nearly ninety-seven years old and is still recognized and read today. It was the beginning of the detective and mystery genre. This book not only had a significant impact on the detective genre, but also in the film industry. The novel was turned into a movie three times, each with several adaptations of the story.
In the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, there are lessons and recurring events in the book that allow it to be viewed in many different ways. This can be done by examining plot points in the book through various literary lenses. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn can be explored and better understood through the feminist and archetypal lenses. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, having taken place in the 1830s, displays minority groups in a negative light or denies them a real role in the development of the novel.
David Cordingly is a maritime historian and the author of many historical pirate books. Cordingly’s book Under the Black Flag shows how the pirates of fictional works have changed from the reality of pirates’ lifestyles. The book succeeds in describing the life of pirate crews along with documented evidence as proof to make the book fascinating and full of interesting information. Under the Black Flag explains how the pirates in fictional works may have evolved based on events that actually happened in the pirates’ world.
The Maltese Falcon novel is a hardboiled novel. It characterizes the era of prohibition in San Francisco. The era of prohibition in San Francisco was an era where there was a sharp rise in mobs and crimes. Women were not left out of these changes. This was when some group of women will become known as flappers.
I believe the characters Brian Taylor and Miguel Zavala in this movie displayed the characteristics that follow the guidelines of the
This sense of hostility springs forth from the misconstrued view of literature being the superior art form among the two, extending to the apparent artistic inferiority of cinematic adaptations, which seemingly “betrays” its source material. But the idea of cinema as a potent and dynamic art
Limited omniscient particularly because the story if from the focus of Rainsford. Although Rainford is not telling the story himself, someone else is describing his story and details from his outlook. Even though the story is in the third person narrative, the focus on the description is of Rainsford's perspective, and this is purposeful for the influence of the central idea. If the story were focused, the General's perspective the storyline and central idea would be entirely different. Deeming the dominant point of view to be Rainsford character's importance to the relation of the central idea; however, the point of view of Rainsford's focus is consistent almost entirely throughout the story until the end where the point of view briefly shifts to the General's and back to Rainsford.
Spade keeps his circle small even from his own partner in crime, showing a sense of maturity and self reliance. In order to gain Spade’s trust, the subject of money would always have to be brought up. “"We believed your two hundred dollars." "You mean –?" She seemed to not know what he meant.
From the cinematic techniques to the plot line, the film incorporates many elements of the style of film. Despite being set in an older period of time and adapting the elements of the spaghetti westerns, it appeals largely to the modern audience due to the certain things which capture their attention. Director Jocelyn Moorhouse
The Return of Martin Guerre explores the life of Martin Guerre and case of alleged imposture in 16th century France. The film premiered first as a 1982 French film directed by Daniel Vigne before the novel was published in 1983. The author of the book, Natalie Zemon Davis, had served as a consultant and helped write the screenplay for the film. Martin Guerre’s story was based primarily on findings of historical documents and knowledge of his time period and location. When compared to the film of the same name, the book goes into farther detail and is more in depth.
N00145563 The Maltese Falcon is a film noir directed by John Huston. The film is based on the novel by Dashiell Hammett of the same name. The film was made and distributed by Warner Bros. and was released in October 1941. In this film, detective Sam Spade, played by Humphrey Bogart, takes on a case from the beautiful but deceptive Miss Wonderly, played by Mary Astor.
Citizen Kane (Welles, 1941) challenged traditional narrative and technical elements of classic Hollywood cinema through techniques in cinematography, mise-en-scene and lighting. The mise-en-scene build of Citizen Kane is the pivoting point of the narrative forthcoming and Welles uses every technical element encompassed in this build to span his narrative across 60 years of Charles Foster Kane, the main character 's life. The beginning of this build is founded on the black and white shooting choice which sets an ominous almost 'film noir ' lighting and feel of the opening scene of the castle in Xanadu. This where we see end of Kane 's life, but every aspect of the film 's narrative will revolve around these frames and including the questions of 'who has died '?, 'what was the significance of the snow globe? ', and 'Who is rosebud? '. The camera angle in the deathbed scene is deliberately shot from a low angle, which further implies the importance of the person lying in the bed as well as providing mystery as the viewer is not yet privy to whom has just
The Godfather (1972) is said to be one of the greatest films ever made. When this movie was released in 1972, it was nominated for Ten Academy Awards and it won three: Best Picture, Best Actor and Best Adapted Screenplay. The film was adapted from the book with the same name written by award winning author of mafia fiction, Mario Puzo. This film takes place in a span of ten years following the life of Don Corleone, the head of the Corleone Crime Family. It was a film that changed the history of cinema, introducing a very talented filmmaker and several acting legends in the telling of a story of a Sicilian Crime Family.
However, only seeing through the protagonist’s eyes, would cause the reader to be unable to see the big picture. Third person single vision is the only point of view that would work for Liam O’Flaherty’s short story, “The Sniper,” because the protagonist needs to be tough as he is fighting at war. Employing an outside narrator, or “a voice created by the author to tell the story,” to provide extremely descriptive details about the sniper’s appearance and subtle details about his surroundings is how
Omniscient narrator: This is a common 3rd person narrator in which the person of the tale knows everything, from private thoughts, secret or hidden events, to jumping betweens time. However, the narrator does not tell the reader or viewer everything, until it has a great affect on the story. This is used throughout the story, and the story line can change whenever. For example, if i am a omniscient narrator, i would be able to tell you what every single character is thinking, their actions, and their consequences.