It has been seen that over time many grievances have been generated across societies due to different reasons in many parts of the world. However, not all grievances turned into successful social movements. For a generic movement to appear and become successful it needs to have the fundamental structural prerequisites, like the presence of political opportunities, mobilization structure and mobilization framework. Along with shared grievances these fundamental structural prerequisites, and factors like the emergence of strong leaders and use of technology, are required for a movement to appear and be successful. Not all grievances are able to fulfill these prerequisites and therefore we see far fewer movements being generated. Political opportunities are created when the structure of power is fragmented, and often times social movements are a sign that institutions in place are not working effectively. For a potential movement to form, the presence of political opportunities …show more content…
Through the use of strategic decisions generic movements are able to gather support from the general population by using effective frameworks to draw compelling arguments in favor of the movement. Using effective mobilization framework in order to appeal to a broader audience and use the existing grievances to generate collective action helps a movement move forward and become successful. However, not all grievances are able to generate collective action as not all grievances are shared among different groups in society. Therefore, only those grievances that appeal to a larger audience and is able to use effective framework to further mobilize the population in supporting their cause is able to turn into a movement and become
“Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements,” by Francesca Polletta focuses mainly on the strategies, methods, and tactics of three groups from the 1960s. The aim of the book was to exemplify the participatory democratic decision making in social movements. The first movement studied by Polletta was the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee, which was a network of both black and white youths, many of which became the main organizers of the Mississippi Freedom Struggle. The second movement studied were the Students for a Democratic Society, who tried to emulate Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee’s organizing approach in seven cities in the northern United States. After the group participated in protesting the Vietnam War, the Students for a Democratic Society became a movement with a membership level in the tens of thousands.
Due the human nature, the pursuits of liberty, justice, and happiness have always been major concerns of humans throughout the history regardless of the way individuals connected and organized. Before phones or emails were even invented, the underprivileged individuals or groups congregated through “close ties”. In the recent years, individuals with “weak ties” adopt a different approach on similar activism with the help of various social media. Although these events are meant for similar intentions, their different communication methods induce an enormous distinction on their impacts, says Malcolm Gladwell in “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”. He depicts that the movements by people bonding with “strong-ties”(Gladwell 405) tend to impact the society with substantial advancement through “high-risk activism”.
This can connect to the 21st century because Thailand started in 2020 and continues today. They peacefully protest a mandate to reform the Thai Monarchy and coup-installed government. This furthers the claim that Gandhi used during his “Salt March” that the best way to prove your point and get your way is without starting a war. It is challenging to make a point without a fight, but it is more impactful if
Throughout history, there have been some astonishing fights for the rights of the people. In the 1800s and early 1900s, two groups made their own push against the government. Starting in the 1800s the Populist group was formed. They were better known as the “Famer Alliance”, because of their mindset to help the farmers and the lower-class people. In the early 1900s, another group was formed, and they were known as Progressives.
The idea of change is to make development, or advance toward a better future; however, to create change, society tend to fall under bloodshed. The American Revolution was a step to freedom, but the cause for independence has killed thousands of innocent lives. The result was seen again in the Civil War when the abolishment of slavery ended in destruction. The Revolution and Civil War might differ for whom they’re fighting for, but are similar with their use of violent. Understanding that violent is never the answer, Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights leader, seek a better approach to create change.
Sydney Krcmarik AP Argument Essay 30 January 2023 Disobedience Sparks Progression Oscar Wilde’s statement about disobedience being a valuable way to promote social change is valid as long as those who are fighting remember that they are fighting to bring positive change to their community. When citizens are motivated to really see change and think more about their community as a whole, rather than their own personal power, real change is possible. For example, Susan B. Anthony’s fight for women's rights led to her doing many disobedient acts. Nonetheless, she did them unapologetically, knowing that she was bringing necessary change and progress. However, when the angry civilians of the French Revolutions rebelled, their leaders tried to strike
Instead, the resulting society reduces people to mindless robots marking time to an oppressive government’s regimented schedules.” (May). American society today there are protesters who fight in what they believe is right for the people in the union. For example, benefits that includes 401K, dental insurance and life insurance. People need to take a stand to encourage others to follow along or to make a long-lasting imprint to what their fighting for.
Traditionally, people were not able to speak their minds. Now, times were changing people were starting to use their voices to express how they feel. People were protesting, writing in newspapers, and other
Once the citizens start to feel oppressed, a change in the law becomes essential to preserve their freedom. To do so, citizens must rally together and protest until the issue has been remedied. The process of peacefully and nonviolently resisting laws considered unjust in order
In cases like this, disobedience in necessary to move forward and progress in American
It is the voices of the common, good people that compel the masses to act. In this way, their actions become a force for good, the oil that wets the cogs of the nation, to keep it from becoming stagnant and rusted as it
To Americans and many others around the world, the U.S. is the face of what should be a “free society,” not including every society’s minor flaws. Maybe it’s because I’m barely entering the brink of my social awareness as a U.S. citizen or maybe is it more due to recent threats to our freedom as Americans, but now more than in the past decade or so, the media has brought the image of huge protests, riots, and demonstrations into the spotlight. And unfortunately, more often than not, many of these events result in violence, aggression, and opposition. Nonetheless, people’s intentions and visions of victory surely do not aim to end in chaos and harm to our societies.
). By, “1916 – Congress passes the Keating-Owen Act, which bans the interstate sale of any article produced with child labor (factory, cannery, and mine) and regulates the number of hours a child could work. The Act was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court two years later.”, and eight years later, in “1924 – Congress adopts a constitutional amendment barring child labor and sends the amendment out to be ratified by the state legislatures. Not enough states ratify the child labor amendment for it to become law.” (Reid Maki), different association, committees, and organizations like: The International Labour Organization, The Children’s Act for Responsible Employment (CARE), and The National Child Labor Committee, among others fought
There has been political talk but little action and this is seen in the policies that are created. Government officials lie about wanting to end the injustice that goes on but when policy arises for change it is shot down and never makes it through the house or senate. There is ways to fight back, however in recent months and the past year we have seen rioting. This is not a new practice of the citizens it has happened before, but rioting has taken place and
Contrary to the finding that “income inequality increases socio-political instability” (Alesina and Perotti, 1993, p. 18) current levels of inequality in China seems to have little impact on the societal status quo. Although China has experienced massive number of social protests, about 180,000 to 230,000 in 2010 alone (Gӧbel and Ong, 2012, p. 8), these protests are motivated by “abuses of power and other procedural justice issues, rather than being fueled by feelings of distributive injustice and anger at the rich” (Whyte, 2012, p. 6). According to a research paper funded by the European Union (Gӧbel and Ong, 2012, p. 36), income inequality is not among the top five motivations for social protests which include land disputes and environmental degradation. This data is evidently incompatible with a survey finding that income inequality is too great for 95% of Chinese as opposed to only 65% of Americans. Barring survey inaccuracy, high levels of inequality in China so far does not translate to dissatisfaction that leads to outright mass protests and instability.