Varian Medical Systems mission is to be the leader in the field of radiation oncology with a continued commitment to the development of innovative state of the art treatment modalities that will enhance the way cancer is treated. Varian Medical Systems is dedicated to making advancement in the fight against cancer along with improving patient care through technological advancement that improves accuracy of treatment, while incorporating patient comfort delivered over a shorter course of treatment.
Socioeconomic factors: Cancer is the second leading cause of death. By 2050 the over the age of 65 population is expected to exceed 83.5 million, which is almost double the 43 million over 65 population in 2012 (CDC, 2015). As age increase, so does cancer risks, with individuals over 65 making up 60% of cancer diagnoses (Berger et al., 2006). Radiation therapy is utilized in over 50% of cancers in the United States unfortunately there is a much higher incidence of death in low income underdeveloped countries where there is a shortage of access to radiation therapy. In 2012, there were a reported 14 million new cases of cancer worldwide, and estimated to reach 24.5 million by 2030 (Atun et al., 2015). Patients today are educating themselves on their treatment options so they can make informed decisions regarding
…show more content…
The competition began thinning out in late 2011 with Elekta and Accuray being the two main competitors remaining. Elekta is the biggest threat with approximately 40% of the market share. In 2015, Elekta and Varian were battling over a patent lawsuit regarding proprietary technology, both fighting to gain control of the imaging device market. Elekta had additional issues in 2015 when they did not meet projected earnings and the CEO quit (Wasserman,
Approximately 100,000 children die of cancer before the age of 15 in the world every day. According to the Journal of American Medical Association, roughly 80% of children with cancer in high-income countries, such as the United States, survive. With that in mind, we must be thankful for the facilities we have close to home, such as Children’s Mercy Hospital.
Because of Stone addressing issues for both the doctors and patients, having people more informed about healthcare overuse would be
All patients have the right to have their medical information provided to them in terms that they can understand. Nurses are supposed to be patient advocates and we must advocate and assist in educating our patients. This is so important since many patients are their own caretakers and need to have the knowledge and tools to care for
Growing up, I have had my fair share of medical encounters, and was even on state insurance for most of my life. This meant that exceptional care was not always in reach, as I had to visit overflowing medical facilities and was unable to choose the better treatment options due to finances. Due to this, I advocate for my patient’s daily at work by calling insurances and working out the logistics of getting them the care they need, or helping them find resources if we hit a dead-end. Putting their care first, each and every day, has helped me advocate for patients of all populations.
The situation could be addressed through the informed shared medical decision, which though has its limitations. Val Jones (2012) notes that the idea of the informed shared medical decision is “as old as the Hippocratic Oath”, but its widespread adoption would “create an extra layer of bureaucracy” (Jones, 2012). In order to understand the validity of this claim, it is recommended to take a look into the innovation. The main idea underlying the informed shared medical decision is that patients should be informed by independent consultants who would help them to make more accurate decision regarding medical interventions. It is suggested that experts hired by a health insurance company or government agency are more objective in their recommendations,
This information is used to appropriately implement prevention and treatment for patients. The second outcome integrates analysis of information gathered by healthcare personnel to identify trends and inconsistencies within the healthcare population. Through this the origin of problems can be ascertained, and preventive measures can be instituted. Subsequently prevention will decrease incidences and ultimately the cost to
Geisinger Health System strongly demonstrate ethical foundation of their work. The doctors get paid based on their performance and the outcome of their actions. Furthermore, in their work they show how to balance the profit with serving the patients need. Additionally, GHS doctors do not fall into the typical conflict of interest where many of the other doctors do. For example, the constant targeting of medical companies in order to sell the companies medication or medical equipment does not exist.
Doctors and physicians have more and better knowledge than normal people about human body and they are able to assist their patients while making tough decisions. However, they can not always make the right decision. Doctors can not predict the result of a surgery or a treatment and they do not have enough confidence of the result because sometimes the surgery could go in a way they didn’t expect. Although patients have the right to decide their treatments, doctors and patients should share
The cancer industry spends virtually nothing of its multi-billion dollar resources on prevention strategies, such as dietary advice, exercise, and obesity education. Instead, it pours its money into treating cancer - chemotherapy drugs, radiotherapy, surgeries, and diagnostic technologies. Why?
Robbins and Judges (2009), defines decision making as “the choice we make when are faced with a problem from among two or more alternatives (Robbins & Judge, 2009).” The way individuals make decisions and the quality of their choices are largely influenced by their perceptions (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Within the healthcare industry, decisions are constantly being made by practitioners, patients, and investors for a better outcome of patient care. Whenever a new product or drug with the potential to change healthcare is introduced, especially those that create a simple solution to extremely complex problems, the outcry is always great for all concerned parties. Take for instance Theranos – a company whose initiative was to make obtaining blood test faster, easier, and at a low cost – a dream come true for every stakeholder in thehealthcare industry.
Understanding the Healthcare system can be very challenging due to the system is constantly changing from new technology manage care, health care reforms, aging populations and other economic factors that have a significant impact in the service provided. Understanding plays an important role in the health care system because the improving quality in the healthcare system requires the implementation of internationally and recognized evidence based guidelines and protocols. EBP is necessary to integrate the best research with clinical expertise and patient value to establish best health outcomes. We believe that openly outlining and understanding some form of theory that explains the reason for why an intervention may work to induce planned
If that is what they the individual want why can’t they have it? Next to heart disease cancer is the number one deadliest illness in America and according to Cancer.org causes 589,430 deaths per year in America. Cancer is an illness defined as the abnormal growth and development of cells in the body and is very painful for most having any form of it either in the actual disease or the treatment. The medication prescribed to these individuals and the care they require can cost
In addition, these radiopharmaceuticals are very effective drugs that can help patients who suffer from bone cancer to feel less pain and for some cases even completely kill the cancer cells making the patient cancer free (Radiopharmaceuticals). Conversely, there are also disadvantages to these drugs. One disadvantage of this kind of treatment using radiopharmaceuticals is that they are very expensive. Each dose of this drug costs between $100-$200 and so the treatment of radiopharmaceuticals is usually only available for someone who is able to afford it. (The Cost of Bringing a Radiopharmaceutical to the Patient’s Bedside).
Hence, practitioners will provide the essential information that will encourage the patient to understand the all known and potential risks and the probability of success. Justices compels that processes
While many treatment options do exist, they may instead provide an additional