ipl-logo

What Are The Constitutional Amendments In The Movie Fracture

1559 Words7 Pages

Fracture is a movie that focuses on the court proceedings of an attempted murder trial and emphasizes the legal aspects of this event. In the film, there are several instances in which the Constitutional Amendments are used in the movie as positive or negative rulings in the court. Because this is a movie follows a complex court case, it is an excellent source for these Constitutional Amendments and provides a multitude of examples to accurately represent the commonly used amendments in trials and arrests. This movie focuses primarily on the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as the basic concepts of criminal justice. In the Movie Fracture, the story begins with Ted Crawford finding out that his wife, …show more content…

As a result, Crawford is found not guilty and is then acquitted based on insufficient evidence. This puts a strain on Beachman’s career and forces him to make a choice based on an ultimatum, and leads Nunally to commit suicide. While he is advised to accept the defeat and move on, his conscious will not allow him to. He begins an obsessive search to find evidence to convict Crawford, and Crawford ends up pulling the plug on Jennifer Crawford, who was on life support. After searching, Beachum discovers that the murder weapon was swapped with Nunally’s gun and provides evidence to bring Crawford to trial again, but this time for murder, since he pulled the plug on his …show more content…

He knew that his written confession was essentially useless. By defending himself, he was able to ask Nunally, in front of the jury, about the affair with the victim. Because of the intimate relationship with the victim, Crawford’s confession was thrown out since it could have easily been coerced. Moreover, the lack of evidence against him made it easy for him to defend himself. He stealthily switched guns with Nunally while he was emotionally comrpromised, which allowed the only piece of evidence to leave the crime scene. Ultimately, Crawford used his Sixth Amendment rights to his own advantage during this trial by denying a defense attorney and representing

Show More
Related

  • Case Analysis: Black Mobsters V.

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial court denied these motions and the statements were used at trial. The jury found petitioner guilty of murder and was sentence to a 24-year prison term. On appeal, Petitioner argued that he had not “knowingly and intelligently” waived his 6th amendment right to counsel before he gave his uncounseled post indictment

    Read More

  • Austin Trial Court Case Summary

    160 Words  | 1 Pages

    Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.

    Read More

  • What Is Heidle's Arguments In The Court Case Of Jack Wilkins

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jack Wilkins was the attorney who represented Virginia. At the time of the trial, he was having IRS and personal problems and was dealing with them as well as the trial. Court records show that two prosecuting attorneys and four trial attendees reported they could smell alcohol on his breath during the trial.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of State Of Oregon Vs Kipland

    853 Words  | 4 Pages

    Tuan Taruselli-Stormes Professor Monica Swaner English 102 February 20, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel” October 16, 2002, P.J. Haselton filed court documents from the case of Kipland Philip Kinkel. This was a trial based on the 111 years and 8 months’ life term sentence Kinkel had received form an earlier trial for four counts of murder and 26 counts of attempted murder. Through this trial, they recapped the original trial, and deliberated over the evidence presented by Mr. Kinkel’s lawyers. Judge Haselton entertained the courts with their premises for grounds of inhumane violations of article I, section 15, and Article I, section 16, of the Oregon State Constitution.

    Read More

  • Bridger Wells Illegal Posse

    531 Words  | 3 Pages

    A towns judge informs the posse that they must bring the suspects back for trial and that the formation of the posse is considered illegal because the sheriff is out of town. This is the first element of an infraction of the due process law. This is important

    Read More

  • Maryland Vs Pringle Case Study

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    The majority explained that the Fourth Amendment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows for officers to arrests without a warrant where officers have probable cause to believe a suspect has committed a crime in the presence of the officer. In this case, the officers undoubtedly concluded that a felony had been committed, and the question for the Court was if the officers had sufficient probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed a crime. According to Chief Justice Rehnquist, that question was a fact dependent investigation as to whether circumstances allowed officers to conclude not only that a crime was committed but to have specific suspicion of Pringle. In the written opinion Justice Rehnquist stated that three men riding in a car where drugs are found, with all three suspects denying possession, affords officers probable cause to conclude that one or all have committed a crime. The Court rejected Pringle’s assertion that the probable cause in this case amounted to “guilt by association,” distinguishing this case from others in which searches of groups had been limited.

    Read More

  • Marcellus William Case Study

    1362 Words  | 6 Pages

    Amendment 6 “Marcellus William didn’t die, but others will” Wisconsin State Journal Published Monday, August 28, 2017 Section A Page 1 Amendment Six says a suspect has the right to have a quick, public and a fair trial. Amendment Six also is in the Bill Of Rights. In court, he or she can see who accused him or her.

    Read More

  • Michael Morton Research Paper

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    The prosecutor, speaking to the jury in emotional terms with tears streaming down his face, laid out a graphic, depraved sexual scenario, accusing Morton of bludgeoning his wife for refusing to have sex on his birthday. "There was no scientific evidence, there was no eyewitness, there was no murder weapon, there was no believable motive," Morton says. "... I didn't see how any rational, thinking person would say that's enough for a guilty verdict."

    Read More

  • Respecting The 13th Amendment

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    Chapter 13 Article Respecting the Seventh Amendment Chapter 13 of the textbook, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System by J. Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, and Jonathon Kingsbury, discusses in great detail all of the more uncommon amendments under the United States (U.S.) Constitution. These amendments consist of the third, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, and finally, the fourteenth amendments (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 437-443). All of these seven amendments are for the most part, not highly discussed in today’s society; however, as of late the seventh amendment has been receiving more and more attention. To briefly sum up, the seventh amendment is part of the Bill or rights in the

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens

    548 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.

    Read More

  • Against The Fourth Amendment

    639 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever since the 1960 's the justice system has been under construction because of the innovative precedents. There has been a constant debate about the justification of the people and how police conduct has an impact. the framework of the fourth amendment will give a better understanding on how the fourth amendment is used. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, house, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but apon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or thing to be seized (U.S Const,. amend IV).

    Read More

  • Procedural Rights In The Criminal Justice System

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal justice system has a set of rules it follows when arresting, interrogating, and placing the accused on trial. These rules are known as procedural rights. Procedural rights are the rights of the accused/defendant, when going through the criminal justice system. They are the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (Bohm, 2018). Also, known as the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • Apprendi Vs New Jersey Case Study

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    Apprendi vs. New Jersey Apprendi vs. New Jersey landmarked United States Supreme Court decisions dealing with provoking factors in crimes. Furthermore, it was found that judges were prohibited to sentence beyond the maximum amount because of factors other than the ones found by the jury. Beyond a reasonable doubt was the key word in this case. This case decision has been the precedent for the rights of people in jury trials. This case set the tone for other trials where an increased prison term was questionable.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Shattered By Debra Puglisi Sharp

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    Shattered is a book written by Debra Puglisi Sharp that tells her scaring story. She was kidnaped, raped and her husband was murdered during the crime. The book focuses on how these events affect her life and that of those close to her, including dragging her family through the trial process. In April 1998, Debra is raped and kidnapped from her home by a stranger. She was then taken to the kidnapper’s home where she was assaulted multiple times and dehumanized, but fortunately, she escaped after five continuous days.

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

    1186 Words  | 5 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

    Read More

More about What Are The Constitutional Amendments In The Movie Fracture

Open Document