Iwasaki, Y. (2015). Youth Engagement—Engaging for Change: Changing for Engagement. Journal of Community Engagement & Scholarship, 8(2), 26-43.
The Participatory Action Research (PAR) was developed to collaborate with leaders and communities to bring forth positive changes from engagement with youths. Engagement is the core of this research study to facilitate change. This article describes the various challenges of engaging with youth, especially youths with high-risk behaviors in society. High-risk youths are those suffering from homelessness, poverty, and addictive behaviors causing various challenges in society including violence. This study wishes to utilize, “strategic youth and partner collaboration” to engage with youth and develop
…show more content…
Some youths participate in drugs, street sex, violence, and other high-risk behaviors because they want a place to sleep or to have food. This article examines different strategies and programs that include community engagement as a crucial role to alter behaviors in youths who are participating in violent behaviors. This is done by implementing a plan, conducting evaluations, evidence-based programs, and leadership to pursue preventing youth violence. Depending on the amount of community collaboration and engagement determines the amount of effort put into altering behaviors and preventing youth violence. Youth violence is one of the main unresolved health problems all over the world. Thus, the main point of this article is the importance of implementing evidence-based programs to combat youth violence. These programs are people-oriented and work specifically to counter youth violence in society with community engagement at it’s core. This topic relates to communities because when the implementation of evidence-based programs has been done correctly, they are grounded in community life to bring forth change with …show more content…
Youths at high-risk are vulnerable to violent behaviors because of poverty, homelessness, and substance abuse. These problems they suffer from are the root of violent behaviors on the streets. This article argues how power causes various levels of engagement in communities to be different due to community partners and researchers arguing over who has power. Communities can have engagement that reduces youth violence but without collaboration, there is not a lot of engagement that can be done. Without collaboration with community partners, it makes it unclear what program should be utilized with researchers to combat youth violence in communities. This article highlights how complex collaboration is between community partners and researchers can be even when researchers know what needs to be done. Researchers should reflect upon their own goals and strive to have partnerships because partnerships are essential to community life and engagement in
How well Wes Moore describes the culture of the streets, and particularly disenfranchised adolescents that resort to violence, is extraordinary considering the unbiased perspective Moore gives. Amid Moore’s book one primary theme is street culture. Particularly Moore describes the street culture in two cities, which are Baltimore and the Bronx. In Baltimore city the climate and atmosphere, of high dropout rates, high unemployment and poor public infrastructure creates a perfect trifecta for gang violence to occur. Due to what was stated above, lower income adolescent residents in Baltimore are forced to resort to crime and drugs as a scapegoat of their missed opportunities.
3). Time and time again, however, the introduction of community policing has only served to divert taxpayer money away from valuable institutions and toward police without changing the relationship between the police and the communities they infiltrate. By nature, adding police to a situation creates hostility — individuals in communities that have been fragmented by mass incarceration know far too well that so long as police officers are present, there is a chance they get shot or go to prison. Situations that would never have escalated in a typical situation often result in arrests and violence. As a man in Prison by Any Other Name recounts, community policing gives officers opportunities to harass people for as little as “tossing a paper plate on the floor.”
Community accountability and community based approaches challenge us to seriously address violence and intimate harms without reproducing the technologies of individualization, pathology, penality, protection under the authority of heteropatriarchy and white supremacy, and criminalisation, all of which continually deny and subvert our notions of safety and justice. We are asked to consider recover and build the potential of community while recognizing and disengaging from strategies that undermine the possibility of community formation. Community accountability is any strategy to address violence, abuse, or harm that creates safety, justice, reparations, and healing without relying on police, prisons, child protection services, or any other state
To solve the problems for young adult engaging in criminal behavior, Program, family and community must be the central roots to help youth to not be involved in Joining gang activities. After school program’s build self-esteem by exposing kids by healthy social relationship, such as an adult role model They also build self-esteem by meeting new friends. In the article’s “What should be Done in the Community to to Prevent Gang-Joining” by Jorja Leap who is a writer and Author, stated. “To ensure the connection between school and after school program in the community, build strategies include: school- Based violence prevention curricula, Trained street workers to do outreach and serve as positive role models, violence prevention curricula at
If community oriented programs are not becoming more of a priority for the at-risk children in the community, those children have a greater chance of entering the system and not leaving it. An example of this type of program is the Project Positive Action through Holistic Education. The program helps the students grow a link to schools. Project Positive Action through Holistic Education includes “peer teaching, school-pride campaigns, peer counseling services, job fairs, and career planning (Araki, 2003)” to help students prepare for the future and keep them out of trouble in the present. Juveniles should be able to leave the detention centers when finished with their sentences and join the real world without being pulled back into the Criminal Justice System.
Buka, S. L., Stichick, T. L., Birdthistle, I., & Earls, F. J. (2001). Youth exposure to violence: Prevalence, risks, and consequences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(3), 298–310. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.71.3.298 Burdick-Will, J., Ludwig, J., Raudenbush, S. W., Sampson, R. J., Sonbonmatsu, L., & Sharkey, P. (2010). Converging evidence for neighborhood effects on children’s test scores: An experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational comparison.
Some major findings in this study were that participants were significantly more violent than the average juvenile delinquent. They were also asked about the most serious crimes that they had ever committed finding that among the 34 participants, 5 terrorist threats, 5 murders, 2 attempted murders, 1 manslaughter, 12 burglaries, 11 strong-armed robberies, 9 assaults with a deadly weapon, 8 drug possessions with intent to deal, 6 gun possessions, and 5 shootings. There were many preexisting risk factors that included exposure to violence, vicarious victimization, and criminal and delinquent acts. In the aspect of their future expectations, they mostly had negative expectations. When the young males were asked about future risks, they really felt like they would be the victim of a violent crime or even shot at.
Young adults between comprise 20% of the U.S population” That how many of us can make a difference in younger kids life and activists don’t even have to be teens they can be any age. Some Activists can not spread the word to many places throughout the
The Planned Change Model is a seven step process which involves: engagement, assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, termination and follow up. (Campus, 2014-2015) In the scenario provided, as social workers the first step would involve engaging the community. As a community dealing with the issue of crime, it would be important to include all stakeholders from the community, victims as well as non-affected individuals.’ Secondly, we would walk through, speaking randomly to engage community members so as to get information on what is happening on the grounds of the community.
Violence is never the answer to a situation, nor should violence even be a option for anyone. Being violent is a mind thing and there are ways person can overcome the thought of hurting, killing, or even verbally abusing someone. In America, violence takes place every second, minute and every hour of the day. In addition, it costs the U.S. billions of dollars a year in health care, law enforcement and lost productivity. Growing up in a violent environment can shape young people’s future actions in a negative way and because violence is a public health problem, the community should help provide proper counseling, and education for the public in order to provide a safer environment for its members.
While the problem of teen dating violence is ever expanding and growing, it is within our abilities to reduce the occurrence and impact on our youth. The current generation of teens and tweens will be our future leaders and we owe it to them to ensure, to the extent of our abilities, that their transition into adulthood is as violence free as possible. Therefore, in recognizing the need to decrease domestic violence in the further, the hypothesis of community support would be very strong. The community of Henderson County North Carolina has historically been supportive of proactive preventative measures to increase the quality of life for its citizens. As for the students attending the course of instruction, the motivation for proactive participation would be based on their grade for the
Introduction Juvenile delinquency due to gang relation has increased drastically. Many people fail to realize that gangs have a considerable influence on the decisions juveniles are making. Adolescents are easily influenced by the members of the gangs and manipulated to commit certain crimes. As juveniles they are not mentally and emotionally mature to make such critical decisions, which in turn allow gang members to manipulate and control the youth they recruit. Juveniles become a part of gangs for several reasons, including, gaining protection, governmental, and social issues.
Community Policing is the system of allocating police officers to areas so that they become familiar with local inhabitants. It is used to change the way police departments interact with the public, focusing on community concerns, including crimes. The idea of community policing is to work together to improve the life and quality in their neighborhoods. Community Policing emerged in the 1970’s with the goal to eliminate public disenchantment with police services and the criticisms of the lack of police professionalism (Fagin pg. 114). They identify and resolve issues which potentially affect the way neighborhoods live.
2. Literature Reviews 2.1 Perspectives on Community Policing This section provides a review of the relevant literature that underpins this study. As argued in the previous paragraph, the concept of community policing, its drivers and purposes can be considered as key unresolved issues in the literature. In this sense, two background questions have guided this literature review section – these being: i) what is community policing; and ii) what are the key drivers for the development and application of community policing?
Yet, the Act did not have a formal way to increase scientific literacy and provide a connection to health research and increasing wellness. Researchers designed new process to engage directly with community that involved not only basic community outreach but also incorporated reflective communication with the public to enhance dissemination, implementation, planning, and action related to health research. Using a partnered approach to research (partnership between the researchers and participants) promotes equal partnerships. This was evident in studies with mental health service users and non-users by changing dynamics of their relationships from subjective to objective. Strategies developed to promote bidirectional communication and stakeholder inputs into research projects include the Health Street model [13], “Boot Camp” Translation [16], Public Cafés [15], science cafés [12], and Community Engagement Studios [14].