Andrew Jackson has been described as a great hero of his time , but he was a man who was atrocious and destroyed the Union. Andrew Jackson accomplished a great number of things during his life but some of his actions were quite questionable. Looking from the present to the past gives insight into areas where the events can be examined more objectively. However, it is vital when examining past events to keep in mind the mindsets of the past. He thought about himself but not about others. Jackson supported a strong national government and used his power to get what he wanted. He vetoed twelve times within his two terms as president. He was labeled “King Andrew the First” by some and he expanded the power of the president. His presidency was one …show more content…
Andrew Jackson failed in meeting most of these qualities. Jackson became a leader of his own party. It was called the “Jacksonian Democracy.” He badly treated Native Indians. Jacksons ignored of Chief Justice John Marshall's decisions. He was responsible for destroying the Second Bank of the United States. He excessively used the “spoils system” in appointing supporters to government positions. President Jackson excessively used veto power to further his …show more content…
The Second Bank had been authorized, during James Madison's tenure in 1816, for a 20 year period. Jackson opposed the national bank concept on ideological grounds. In Jackson's veto message, the bank needed to be abolished because: It concentrated an excessive amount of the nation's financial strength into a single institution. Second Bank served mainly to make the rich richer and exercised too much control over members of the
They concluded that the actions Jackson took as president were reasonable and justifiable. During his presidency, Jackson made bold actions. After he was elected president he allowed Democratic followers to have jobs in the government. This choice led to what many called the “Spoils System”. Jackson also despised the Bank of the United States and to make
Andrew Jackson was a man of many accolades. He served in the Revolutionary War and was a general in the War of 1812. He aided in founding the Democratic Party and became the first governor of Florida; not to mention being the seventh President of the United States. While his list of accomplishments is extensive, it is sometimes clouded by his alleged boisterous and lewd behavior. Stemming from this behavior is an ample amount of scandalous activity, both personal and professional.
Some say he was one of the most successful presidents, but other believe he was basically a tyrant. Jackson was a very opinionated character that believed in individuals freedom, but his actions showed otherwise. Starting with the Indian Removal Act of 1835. He believed they were not part of a foreign nation, but that they were lower than whites, and he knew what was best for the Indians more than them. When the case was brought to the Supreme Court, he ignored their response of declaring his actions unconstitutional.
Andrew jackson was a important cotributor and one of the most influential presidents to ever serve the country. He took on the countries domestic issues and used his executive power far to its extent. Jackson effectivly evicted the native americans which stopped the conflict between the colonists. He vetoed the second bank of america, terminating the recharter bill from ever becoming a law. Also, he avoided south carolina’s seceding from the union.
Andrew Jackson had a strong negative impact on the United States during his presidency. Jackson’s first taste of power was in 1796 when he was elected to the Tennessee House of Representatives, which shortly led to his seat in the U.S Senate from Tennessee. When this position did not satisfy Jackson he ran for president against John Quincy Adams in 1824, which he lost. Four years later, Jackson ran once again for president except he had a successful outcome. During his presidency Jackson had four main principles, white man’s suffrage, the Spoils System, Indian Removal and Opposing the National Bank.
Andrew Jackson was not one of the best presidents, but in fact a bad president. One of the most despicable things he did was kick out thousands of Native Americans from their homes. They were treated terribly and 5,000+ died. The worst thing about this is how Andrew Jackson kicked out a group of people for no actual reason. They were innocent and good people trying to cooperate with us.
President Andrew Jackson was a hero to some but a villain to more. Andrew Jackson protected his fellow Americans well, but he ruined the lives of many Native Americans. President Andrew Jackson was a bad and horrible man to the NAtive Americans. President Jackson was a villain to the Native Americans. He created the Indian removal act that removed the Indians from their homes.
Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.
Jackson 's push to abolish national banks other wise known as "the bank wars" was one of his more well known pushes for small government. In 1832, Jackson had vetoed a bill calling for an early renewal of the Second Bank’s charter, but renewal was still possible when the charter expired
Andrew Jackson was one of the greatest presidents who made very difficult decisions for our country. Although his choices were not always the popular decision, he made choices that were always promoting democracy. The things that make a good democracy are: giving people a say in government, having a good leader that you can trust to make wise decisions, peace and stability between each country and other states, and having equal power in the government (checks and balances). Andrew Jackson came into office with a popular vote and great support. His supporters viewed him as a man of the people.
Brittany Randall-Neppl APUSH Period 6 Mr. Kloster 12/19/2014 Andrew Jackson: Champion of the Common Man or Tyrant Andrew Jackson was born into a common life but overcame his mediocre beginnings to become a powerful politician; in 1828 he was elected president of the United States. However, he abused this position of power and made several choices that were detrimental to the welfare and rights of the American people. Jackson implemented the spoils system on a national scale and had unofficial members of his cabinet who did not have to answer to Congress. After South Carolinians were upset by the Tariff of 1832 he was angry toward those who did not agree with it. He also destroyed the National Bank and authorized the Specie Circular.
This title gave him a boost on reasons of why he should become president. Other than that, Jackson should not have been elected president, for he made many inexpert and wrong decisions such as the Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson was considered a tyrant because of his removal of the Native Americans, overuse of vetoing, and the general fact that he just
Andrew Jackson during his time was considered a very patriotic politician he hated the rich, he hated the Indian, and loved the idea of slavery. It has been said that he grew up not educated and had a bad up bring but still managed to get to a high political suture. Jackson at one point was general and had a very decorated portfolio, which made sense he would become president, Andrew was most well know for “The Battle of New Orleans” where Andrew Jackson, prevented the British Army and General Edward Pakenham, from seizing New Orleans nearing the end of that war.
He showed unifying leadership during the Nullification Crisis and the Tariff laws of 1828 and 1832, he showed a generous approach of governing through the “Kitchen Cabinet” and the “Spoils System”. Lastly, his concern for economic equality was shown through the veto of the Second Bank of the United States Recharter and his concerns for the common men. All of these qualities that Jackson had shown during his presidency are why Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero of the common
Andrew Jackson was a contradictory president who had many constitutional and unconstitutional arguments when it came to using his executive power, such as when he vetoed the Maysville Road Bill and the Second National Bank, which was either based on his own personal bias, or how beneficial it would be to the United States. Therefore justifying whether he was vetoing a bill based on actually analyzing the institutions and effects of their removal or result of arbitrary decisions with little analysis is based on ones perspective. The vetoing of the Second National Bank and the Maysville Road Bill is great example of how he used his vetoing powers and in what regard. The vetoing of the Maysville Road Bill is controversial.