If there is one thing that Quentin Tarantino is known for, it is his brilliant use of dialogue. In Pulp Fiction particularly, he does not just use conversations as a tool for advancing the plot, but he also as a way to establish characters’ motivations and identities. Pulp Fiction is a crime movie that binds together the stories of the hitmen Vincent Vega (John Travolta) and Jules Winnfield (Samuel L. Jackson), along with their boss Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) and his wife Mia Wallace (Uma Thurman), and boxer Butch Coolidge (Bruce Willis). The movie uses unorthodox changes between time and location of the film to tell all of their stories in a more engaging way. The characters’ motivations in Pulp Fiction could never truly be understood …show more content…
Tarantino uses dialogue not as a tool but as the focal point to building each character’s personality. The conversation between Tim Ross’ and Amanda Plummer’s unnamed characters at the beginning of the film about robbing a store reveals everything the viewer needs to know about each of them. The man starts by saying “No, forget it, it 's too risky. I 'm through doin ' that shit”, but eventually the women coerces him into agreeing to committing a robbery showing that she is in control. Also in this scene, the women sharply changes her personality multiple times through her speech, establishing her as mentally unstable. For example, she appears empathetic and kind when she thanks the waitress compared to her seeming apathetic and aggressive when she takes out her gun. Perhaps in no scene was the dialogue more revealing of the characters than when hitmen, Vincent and Jules’, were driving towards their boss with a passenger in their car discussing their miraculous survival. Vincent starts by lightly saying “Ever seen that show "cops?" I was watchin ' it once and this cop was on it who was talkin ' about this time he got into this gun fight with a guy in a hallway. He unloads on this guy and he doesn 't hit anything. And these guys were in a hallway. It 's a freak, but it happens” showing that he doesn’t believe surviving an attack meant anything specific. Jules, however, responded by saying “If you wanna play blind man, then go walk with a Shepherd. But me, my eyes are wide fuckin ' open”. Jules uses biblical references to convey that he is a determinist, believing that everything happens for a reason, whereas it is made for the viewer to believe that Vincent is an existentialist, believing that the world was devoid of meaning. Tarantino uses simple conversation between character as the main resource for knowing
Continuing, the officers went floor-to-floor searching for a nonexistent sniper. After the failed search, the policemen gathered the seven residents downstairs and lined them up. “Foreshadowing the gruesome ‘game’ to come,” writes Hersey, “the officers began to take people from the line, one by one, into rooms, for what might have been called—and might strictly not—questionings” (264). The officers began an aggressive interrogation that consisted of pistol whipping. One of the survivors, Lee Forsythe, told Hersey that the policeman, Robert Paille, “started questioning us, asking us where the gun was.”
The audience also becomes more engaged due to the funny dialog and actions between Sarah and Ross. An example of the noteworthy dialog is when the older man is discussing “useless” classes, and he mentions one of Ross’ classes while Ross is in the room. Furthermore, it is hilarious when Sarah is passive aggressive towards Ross, but he is confused to why she would be angry with
All Speeches have there ups and down Its how you present it that really matters. If you have an organized speech your speech will present itself because it will flow out naturally. Making sure that you have constant eye contact with the audience will help sound you more credible. Most importantly making sure that the topic that you have chosen makes sense to what you are doing. While listening to the current even speech that Napoleon Dynamite did and the speech that SpongeBob Square Pants did it is clear that one has practiced more and demonstrated better speech concepts.
The speech in “To Kill A Mockingbird” has had a hand in the Civil Rights movement during 1960, when book was released, so having to interpret and revise that impacting of a speech for film while trying to keep its same meaning was a difficult process. To find evidence that Robert Mulligan did a proper job converting Atticus’s speech to film, it is expedient to look at what made the speech commendable, and what made the speech inadequate. So by comparing and contrasting the positive and negative aspects of Atticus’s speech in both the book and movie, it is possible to determine if the speech was adapted to film well. There are many things that made the speech in “To Kill A Mockingbird” excellent. In the text, Atticus attempts to use his morals to sway the jury into his favour.
This film also has a great aesthetic way of presenting characteristics of the movie as a whole, for example when filming Brenton Butler, they made sure that almost throughout the movie entirely he did not speak to put more emphasis on the first impression of Lestrade and Poncet’s of Butler as a completely detached individual; showing how Butler’s voice was denied by the injustice of the Florida legal
She tends to repeat the same dialog in this argument and through out the play which does not
The novel Speak, by Laurie Halse Anderson, is about a girl named Melinda, who shows signs of depression throughout the story. She has no friends and is hated by people she doesn’t even know. This is because she called the cops at a party, where she was raped. Anderson includes literary elements to show how Melinda is depressed. Throughout the novel, she uses many different literary elements to show Melinda’s conflict.
She views Minnie as a friend and overlooks the racism. Additionally, she does not understand social cues that is hinted when no women answer her calls, whereas Boo accepts the fact that no one will accept him and “wants to say inside”. Whilst Lee suggests that those who do not follow societal expectations are misjudged, Taylor condemns that those who have a different reality are mainly
It is easier for the audience to possess these issues. The use of music or silent also helps convey the atmosphere of the film and highlight characters’ emotions. Symbolism also plays a huge part in this movie. One of the most prominent elements in the movie is the narration of Forrest Gump, who serves as a first-person narrator to tell his life story.
People say a picture is worth a thousand words. Just about every picture has rhetorical elements incorporated into their design. In this case, the well-crafted poster for Steven Spielberg’s film, Jaws, implements the use of ethos, pathos and logos in an attempt to get its audience to see the film. The poster for jaws is very effective at gaining the audience’s attention through the use of graphic pictures.
The mood of the movie at this point shifts from dark and solemn to alive and talkative. The active dialogue and intonation used by the actors made the storyline interesting. For example, the news reporters exemplified the very image of a news reporter back in the day: curious, chatty, and amusing. Their somewhat boisterous nature is countered by unconventional lighting, as the audience hears their conversation but sees mostly shadows or just glimpses of their faces.
Communication is an important element in video analysis. Ideally, a careful analysis of the different characters in the scene and their role in enhancing interpersonal communication is much more important. In consideration of this concept the underlying principles of interpersonal communication, there is a need to assess its applicability in the movie; Goodfellas. The three-minute scene titled, "I 'm funny how, I mean funny like I 'm a clown" is a reflection of how self-concept, perception, and non-verbal communication work together in the context of dyadic communication.
The narration in the movie can be described as circular narrative as the ending and beginning when merged complete the timeline of the movie(1). This narrative structure is rather unconventional and reminds the audience at multiple instances that this is not real life and they are watching a movie. One of these instances include Mia (Uma Thurman) drawing a rectangle on screen while talking to Vincent (John Travolta) in car in front of Jack Rabbit Slim’s. The film includes multiple clues which link its narration style to Post Modernism. To understand this linkage, firstly Post Modernism should be described.
On a mission to retrieve a briefcase for Mr. Wallace, Vincent eventually finds the briefcase stored in a cupboard. As Vincent looks down to open the briefcase, the camera is facing up at him. The camera pointing up at Vincent is significant because the use of a low-angle shot is used here to reveal that whatever is in the briefcase is much larger and more important than Vincent himself. Continuing in the scene, the low-angle camera moves further down to the ground, zooming in more in Vincent’s as he appears now larger than the briefcase. As Vincent is now the main focus, Jules ask “Vincent, we happy?”, in which Vincent replies, “Yeah, we happy” (Paris & Simrill 2013).
Dialogue is used in a writing piece in order to move the plot, to develop or define the character, or just to deepen the conflict. All together, dialogue is used to help the reader infer the theme of the text. Sandra Cisneros expresses the theme throughout the novel with the use dialogue to develop the characters in The House on Mango Street which retells her life experiences that made her who she is today in vignettes just like No Speak English. In her other work of literature, Eleven she shows the same theme, with the addition of the theme that there is a certain amount of power held by age. In the texts Eleven and No Speak English by Sandra Cisneros, the use of dialogue helps reveal aspects of the characters in each piece in order to develop the theme of identity and belonging.