The presidential campaigns of GOP candidates Mike Huckabee¬—former Governor of Arkansas—and Marco Rubio—Senator from Florida—differ starkly in many respects. The two enjoy different bases of support, differ on many of the issues and employ radically different rhetorical styles and debate tactics. However, in terms of the campaigns’ media strategy, the most interesting difference lies in the candidates’ propensity (or lack thereof) to attack their fellow GOP candidates publically. Analyzing Rubio and Huckabee’s penchant to publically denounce other GOP candidates via social media will likely reveal the differences between the two campaigns’ online communication strategies. The differing strategies could be reflective of the candidates’ position in the polls; in so far that a leading candidate may have a higher incentive to attack other candidates, while lower polling candidates may have an incentive to behave in a more restrained manner. …show more content…
Further, the candidates have also been selected because of their apparent strategic differences, specifically as displayed during the opening two GOP presidential debates. In the opening debates, Rubio appeared aggressive, desperate to separate himself from a saturated GOP field; on the other hand Huckabee appeared reserved, eschewing conflict and attacks even when opportunities to do so presented themselves. The candidates debate performances, when juxtaposed, suggests that they are employing different strategies, which is likely to be manifested in the candidates’ online communications, among other
Nicholas Kristof’s “3 Peerless Republicans for President: Trump, Carson and Fiorina”, deems the leading candidates from the Grand Old Party unfit for presidency, and the public’s fixation with them a temporary affair. Multiple previous controversies being detailed, and the use notably bleak statistics help undermine the contenders while urging voters to look elsewhere. Kristof utilizes harsh diction with a simple, yet critical tone to denounce the trio, and further his own
Extra Credit: CNBC GOP Presidential Debate CNBC’s GOP Presidential Debate this year was held at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and the moderators focused their questions greatly on the economy, current national budget, tax reforms, immigration policies and their disagreements with the Democratic party. The Republican candidates that participated in this debate included Ohio governor John Kasich, former governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Florida senator Marco Rubio, business man Donald Trump, retired surgeon Ben Carson, former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, Texas senator Ted Cruz, New Jersey governor Chris Christie, and Kentucky senator Rand Paul. With tensions growing between candidates and political parties, I feel that the moderators for this debate seemed to personally attack the candidates when questioning their reasoning behind their answers.
Homework Assignment 9 Due in week 10 and worth 30 points Suppose that there are two (2) candidates (i.e., Jones and Johns) in the upcoming presidential election. Sara notes that she has discussed the presidential election candidates with 15 friends, and 10 said that they are voting for candidate Jones. Sara is therefore convinced that candidate Jones will win the election because Jones gets more than 50% of votes. Answer the following questions in the space provided below: 1.
The turmoil, upheaval, and controversy of the 2016 Trump election is a significant current event of the modern world, but this landslide election is not the first in America’s history to raise such conflicting opinions. The Revolution of 1800 was another shift in political history that impacted not only the candidates, but majority of the public. The defeat of John Adams to Vice President Thomas Jefferson led to the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party rule and the eventual demise of the Federalist Party. Often in politics, opposing views, scandals, and negative publicity plays a role in the election process, due to this, in both the 2016 election and 1800 election negative criticism from both parties was evident. The 1800 and 2016 elections
Bush v. Gore The presidential election that took place on November 7, 2000, was so close that no one knew for more than a month who had won the election of 2000 the Governor of Texas George W. Bush or Vice President Al Gore. By the end of the night, Bush had won 246 electoral votes Gore had won 260. The number of electoral votes needed to win the election is 270. Florida had twenty five electoral votes that were needed to win the election.
Based off of Kasich’s previously mentioned accomplishments as congressman and governor, his strengths as a candidate rests with his appeal to moderate and “old-school” Republicans. Strengths that will make him appealing to voters across the thirteen states which go to the polls on March 1, 2016 (Levinson 2016). Thus, Kasich’s delegate strategy has been to survive the bellwether primaries and wait until the battleground primaries where he has an advantage over his one-dimensional opponents and will be able to accumulate considerable amounts of delegates nationwide. Although this is a sound strategy that enables Kasich a mathematical chance to win the nomination, he has been in the background the entire race unable to emerge from the shadows cast by the frontrunners. As the frontrunners talk over each other and make snide comments during debates and rallies, Kasich is able to stay out of the political fray and rise above the perceived childish bickering (Grunwald 2016).
Both the Democrats and the Republicans like to think of themselves as the true heirs of Thomas Jefferson. The modern Democrats are historically descended from the Democratic-Republican Party that Jefferson himself organized to thwart the ambitions of Alexander Hamilton (although, ironically, they were known as "Republicans" in Jefferson 's time). Democrats around the country annually celebrate Jefferson-Jackson Dinners, avowedly declaring a connection between Jefferson and the modern Democratic Party. But Republicans claim that their platform of small government and low taxes is more in line with true Jeffersonian philosophy than that of the big-government Democrats.
Effective and Ineffective Presidential Campaigns of 1992 “My administration will make security and savings compatible”, says former president Bill Clinton (Bill Clinton). The question is, who did more for the U.S. economy in their presidency, Bill Clinton, or George Bush? This is really a matter of opinion, and even though it was in the past, it is still a very big topic today in our economy. For example, in the term prior to the 1992 election, there was an economic decline due to Bush being president.
I personally feel I am more of a Democrat than a Republican. American Politics The two major political parties of the United States are the Democrats and the Republicans. There are also third parties such as the Constitution party, the Green party, the Independent party, and the Libertarian party. The Democratic and the Republican Party constantly compete with each other trying to promote their political ideals and searching the means for maintaining their continuous political leadership.
Earlier this year, the current president of the United States was quoted saying that being the President was more work than his previous life and that he thought it would be easier” (Mele 2017). This is a person that according the constitution has the job responsibility of being chief executive of the federal government and Commander in Chief of the armed forces (“The President’s Job | Scholastic.Com” n.d.). One participant is said “I feel like Donald Trump is that guy that filled out a job application.
What makes a great president? What makes a presidential candidate to be appealing to the common man? Is it the physical appearance which makes them appealing? In the election of 1824 the two presidential candidates were Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams. Adams was said to have been a man of short stature, a high voice and a bald head.
The Iowa Caucuses can majorly affect politics. The first look of what candidates, real Americans are backing plays a major role in how the rest of America sees the candidates. The media attention Iowa gets also influences the rest of America. After the 2016 Iowa Caucuses the tops candidates are now what names are shown in news articles to catch people’s attention, since those candidates are now seen as the leaders even though it is still early in the election (Clark, 2007; Andrews, Bloch…, 2016; Collinson, 2016; Naft,
On September 26,2016 the first presidential debate commences between Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. One of the topics that was extensively debated on was the Criminal Justice system and the issue of systemic racism in this country. Donald Trump took the stance of Law and Order in order to solve the issue that are prevalent in our society today. In contrast, Hillary Clinton approach was one of Criminal Justice Reform. By analyzing the candidate’s responses in relation to outside reliable sources we can the verify which running mate is truthful.
Introduction: A Basket of Deplorable(s): Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton’s Use of the Word Deplorable Before addressing the quote-on-quote controversial word used by the Democratic Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton to describe half the supporters of the Republican Nominee Presidential Nominee Donald Trump Campaign, it is important to make one fact clear. Regardless of the political spectrum, presidential candidates support, presidential candidates should never negatively described their opponents’ group of supporters and/or voters. In other words, attacking presidential candidates’ campaign is one factor, but attacking their supporters is another issue within itself, which causes more harm than good.
Political Parties have been around since the begin of American government, but were they meant to be? Our first president, George Washington, before he stepped down from office gave us two words of advise. That America as a nation should stay out of foreign affairs and to not develop political parties. Others like Washington have had the same ideals. John Adams, the second U.S. president, had said, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic in two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition of each other.”