Of the films that I have seen of John Huston and Martin Scorsese it’s hard not to notice their similarities and numerous differences. Perhaps the most obvious comparison to make is how they use decor and costumes, both of their films, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) and Taxi Driver (1976), take place at the time of their release, so the costumes and settings are realistic and most importantly lived-in. How these locations are lived in are portrayed a little differently through lighting and camera work, as Travis Bickle’s apartment is dark and grungy looking throughout the film, Scorsese is a filmmaker that likes to portray these kind of locations and characters that would inhabit them. Scorsese’s film feels less like a studio film and …show more content…
This ultimately fits his style of film as it is generally dialogue driver, with characters spending a lot of time discussing plans with one another and setting up emotions and plot points. A great example of this comes up in Sierra Madre when Dobbs and the others are discussing what they are going to do with the trespasser Cody, the camera stays in place and cuts back and forth between Dobbs and his partners, the camerawork and editing here isn’t flashy or fancy, but it gets the job done. Scorsese on the other hand, loves to move the camera around and depict unique editing techniques. In Taxi Driver, Travis makes a phone call to Betsy about their disturbingly awkward date. At first the camera stays fixed on Travis, but as the conversation goes on the camera moves away from Travis and focuses on the hallway leading out of the building. This is something Huston would have never done, as dialog is something he tends to focus his camera on, but Scorsese is more willing to move the camera away and almost give it a life of it’s
My final is about the difference between the book and the movie “The Outsiders.” This next paragraph is about the description difference between the book and movie. Then the paragraph after that will be about the description of the background or cars that the characters drive or live in. I think that the move and the book where basted of the same story but I think that when the directors made the movie with some different cars or house that can change the movie or they put different things in it so that the movie will look better. Altogether the movie and the book were pretty good and had good meaning to it about want to think of life and it’s alright to not be tough and hard.
I will compare the similarities and differences in regards to various realist traits. Verisimilitude is the appearance of being true or real, and both films both deliver it in one way or another. One of the main ways the films are able to achieve this the camera technique. Both use handheld camera work and aim for a rough look. Only using real locations add to the verisimilitude as well as the use of non professional actors.
Imagine seeing character from a film walking in a obscure solitary hallway where you see a vast shadow of a mole trying to devour you... this might seem cool but this is indeed one of the major differences between the City of Ember film and the Bible. If you want to have my opinion, I would assay that the Bible is a lot better than the film, some other differences are such as adding incident, speed of story and events, and characters. In the City of Ember film they had to add some events so that the motion picture wouldn't get boring. One of the events that the picture had and the Bible doesn't would be the gigantic mole because the mole had some major events such as consumption the mayor and trying to butcher Lina and Doon.
“The Shining” is a novel written by Stephen King in 1977 and a horror movie directed by Stanley Kubrick in 1980. The novel and movie tells a story about Jack Torrance, who becomes the off-season winter caretaker of the Overlook Hotel. Although the movie and the book have some similarities; there are many differences from the adaptation of the novel. In the book, the main characters are Jack Torrance, Wendy Torrance, and their son Danny Torrance.
Stephen King, a famous writer once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They are both fruit, but they taste completely different.” Truly, this applies to all movies and books. This quote is effective describing the novel and the movie, A Raisin in the Sun. Although the two share similar scenes and acts, the movie shows a lot more details which make it better.
"It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see" (Thoreau, n.d.). This quote by Henry Thoreau highlights the ability for humans to possess differing perspectives on the same event. While an onerous situation may negatively affect one person, it may have little to no effect on another. In Elie Wiesel's book Night (2006) and the movie "Life is Beautiful" (2000), this reality of differing perspectives is portrayed through the eyes of a father and son as they endure the horrific conditions at Auschwitz during the Holocaust. These accounts provide an insightful glimpse into the differing reactions of humanity as it struggles to comprehend suffering.
Into the Wild is a personal tale of Chris McCandless’ journey as he runs away from home to try and live in the Alaskan wilderness. The book follows the story through the eyes of the author as he investigates the mysteriousness of Chris’ life through the eyes of those he came in contact with and the journals left behind. However like every book adapted into movie there are slight differences and characterizations throughout the story that aren’t expressed deeply enough or seen in a different light. Into the Wild is no different.
The mood of the movie at this point shifts from dark and solemn to alive and talkative. The active dialogue and intonation used by the actors made the storyline interesting. For example, the news reporters exemplified the very image of a news reporter back in the day: curious, chatty, and amusing. Their somewhat boisterous nature is countered by unconventional lighting, as the audience hears their conversation but sees mostly shadows or just glimpses of their faces.
The comparison between Stanley and Vernon “A street car named desire” by Tennessee Williams and “Naked Lunch” by Michael Hollinger setting is different, but themes are essentially the same with concerning relationships. “A street car named desire” is set in New Orleans in 1947 in a two-bedroom apartment on the first floor. The setting of “Naked Lunch” is in a small dining-room table, eating food, there is a small vase and a large vase, and a bottle of vine in the dining-room. In both these short stories they use symbolism, in “A street car named desire” the symbolism used is the lights and lanterns and in “Naked Lunch” symbolism used is meat, corn, and having lunch. The characters Stanley and Vernon are merely the same with anger problems,
Similarities and Differences of the Play and Movie A Christmas Carol Greed is a trait nobody should have and one man’s life was ruined by it. “Bah Humbug!”is a famous quote from the astounding play, A Christmas Carol the story of a rich, old, mean man named Ebenezer Scrooge whose life was turned around. The play was later copied in a movie in 1984 and the movie shows many similarities and differences to the play. Most of the similarities and differences appear when the three ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future visit him and change his life for the better.
What Scorsese did differently was that he made male protagonists vulnerable again, just like they were in the old mobster movie days, but in a bit more realistic way Scorsese produces movies in a way that, according to Kolker, he „Determines our point of view and our emotional and intellectual attachment to the film. We are therefore, scarcely allowed any separation from what the central character is seeing. “ (218). He even does this directly by breaking the fourth wall twice in Goodfellas, and therefore making us feel as though we are the acomplices in all the things that were happening in the film. And we all know that it is very hard to judge ourselves effectively.
"Just follow me like your life depends on it. Because it does. "(Dashner 361) In where a boy named Thomas finds himself in a maze with several other boys and no memory of how he got there or his past.
The critically acclaimed film, Goodfellas, is a gangster crime drama that features an incredible amount of talent. Household names such as: Robert De Niro (Jimmy Conway), Joe Pesci (Tommy DeVito), Paul Sorvino (Paul Cicero), and promising stars like Ray Liotta (Henry Hill) and Lorraine Bracco (Karen Hill), attracted numerous Oscar and Golden Globe nominations. That type of cast power, linked with the signature talent of Martin Scorsese as a director, made for cinematic gold. Unquestionably, the actors and actresses did an excellent job augmenting the verisimilitude of this film and compelling audiences to empathize with their characters. But the cinematography in this film plays just as large a role in having audiences feel what the characters
La La Land, directed by Damien Chazelle, has won many awards and is about the love story between Sebastian and Mia, who come together because of their common goal of making it big time in Hollywood. The scene that follows is when they are having dinner after some time apart. It portrays the theme of how change can affect relationships. Initially in the scene, the camera is placed over the shoulder of Sebastian, with the view of Mia as they are having a conversation over dinner. This is a two shot scene accompanied by very minimal editing, indicating they are sharing the frame as a couple.
The narration in the movie can be described as circular narrative as the ending and beginning when merged complete the timeline of the movie(1). This narrative structure is rather unconventional and reminds the audience at multiple instances that this is not real life and they are watching a movie. One of these instances include Mia (Uma Thurman) drawing a rectangle on screen while talking to Vincent (John Travolta) in car in front of Jack Rabbit Slim’s. The film includes multiple clues which link its narration style to Post Modernism. To understand this linkage, firstly Post Modernism should be described.