Both these courses of action lead to ecological imbalances and have severe long-term effects on the environment. On a national level, this cycle affects the country, because reduced coffee production, decreases foreign exchange earnings and export earnings, which also
The massive, concentrated amounts of waste these factory farms generate are beginning to run off and devastate aquatic ecosystems and other water sources. Off the coasts and farther out into the oceans lie dead zones. These are patches of water that are so polluted and poisoned that they can no longer support marine life. Caused by the runoff of different chemicals like garden fertilizers and industrial waste, ocean dead zones have been a growing problem. While action needs to be taken to reduce the runoff made directly by humans, some of the largest contributors to this sickening problem are factory farms.
With any change comes consequences, good and bad. The negative side of our society eating plant based is that more and more heavy pesticides will have to be applied in order to yield enough crop to sustain human populations. With heavy chemicals being used this damages our environment as well. A negative side of creating legal requirements for farms is that there are ways around these rules or loop holes so to speak. I do believe however, that the good outways the bad in this situation.
With the animals in such close confinement the risk for diseases it’s inevitable for an outbreak to happen in the factory farming industry. The waste these animals produce exceeds the amount landscapes can absorb, and the excess must be disposed which causes environmental problems. The amount of manure produced at factory farm industries globally is three times more than humans. This web page provides the information necessary to prove my topic that more environmental regulations need to be made to protect the environment, and public
Trees are being cut down at a very fast rate and we need to do something about it before it is too late. Deforestation has a major effect that is harmful to the world’s atmosphere (TS). Global warming is a result of deforestation and a main factor in hurting the atmosphere. Trees take in and store carbon dioxide, while producing oxygen
This produces a huge conflict because this makes their food sources very scarce and limited. This will cause a massive starvation spike in wildlife activity. According to a study conducted by Michigan State University, they state that even if a small portion of the rainforest is destroyed, this can cause an entire species extinction (Smith). Why this can happen is because the wildlife that lives within that environment is specialized for that environment. The wildlife simply cannot survive in different conditions than what they were built to live in.
Therefore, it is possible to claim that it has a 'glocal' - both global and local - dimension. The exploitation of resources and the massive use of chemicals involved with intensive agriculture have contributed to permanently damage the environment, thus endangering the development of different species (Croall, 2014). In fact, intensive agriculture is causally related to increases in water and air pollution, decrease of soil fertility, and soil erosion (Lang et al., 2009). All of these, taken together, can be held responsible for the destruction of natural habitats of a number of species of wildlife (Lawrence, 2008). Intensive farming has also been linked to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions (Croall, 2014): intensive livestock accounts for nearly one fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions, rivalling with the emissions from the global transport sector (Lawrence, 2017c).
The environmental harm from multinational agribusiness and resource extraction corporations and transnational development plans is not only bad ecologically, but it also affects the small communities and indigenous people living off the Gran Chaco. As the world’s population grows the demand for food and agribusiness increases.
By marketing certain foods as nutritional holy grails in Western cultures, increased demand is placed on the countries producing these foods, which can damage the physical geography of these areas (Sander & Jacobsen 2014). Local individuals also have a more difficult time consuming these dietary staples on their own terms (Ofstehage 2012). Additionally, in terms of climate change, most “superfoods” are produced out of North America. As such, these foods have to travel farther distances, increasing the amount of pollution in the form of carbon dioxide emissions that are released into the atmosphere (Wheeler & von Braun 2013). Moreover, in terms of food quality, increased demand for “superfoods” can lead to heightened levels of contamination.
As our population grows, we need more and more land to either live on or grow food on. This means we have to start cutting down forests to make room. The plants in the forests are what make the oxygen that we breath through photosynthesis which is a part of the carbon cycle. The more we cut down, the more we interfere with that cycle and the more the rest of the forest is affected. This interfering with the carbon cycle is also a contributor to the issue of global warming.