Corruption in Hamlet and 1984 Comparing William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet to George Orwell’s novel 1984 may seem like a difficult task on the surface, however, through further analysis, the theme of corruption links these two texts together. Corruption: dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power. In both Hamlet and 1984, the protagonists desire to overcome corruption inevitably leads to their downfall. In society today, people are entitled to their own thoughts. However, in the novel 1984, this is not the case. Orwell writes, The thing he was about to do was to open a diary. This was not illegal (nothing was illegal, since there were no longer any laws), but if detected it was reasonably certain that it would be punished by death, …show more content…
This ultimately leads Winston to be caught and subjected to a fate worse than death. Although having both the diary and the relationship with Julia was Winston’s way of resisting conformity to the party, they were both contributing factors to his downfall. Perhaps this is worse than death for Winston, as he became the person he never wanted to be. Similar to Winston, the protagonist in Hamlet, Prince Hamlet, sees the corruption of power in his life and, in his attempts to overcome it, he dies. Hamlet realizes that his step-father, Claudius, has murdered his father and married his mother shortly after the murder, all to become King. After learning this, Hamlet’s sole motivation is to avenge his father’s death by revealing Claudius’ deception. Hamlet’s initial plan to expose Claudius is to have performers put on a play imitating the events of his father’s death. Hamlet says, I’ll have these players play something like the murder to my father before mine uncle. I’ll observe his looks; I’ll tent him to the quick. If ‘a do blench, I know my course…The play’s the thing wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King (Shakespeare
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
1984, such a book was written to expose lies and draw attention to facts to the gruesome dystopian future, where free thought is suppressed under a totalitarian regime. It was Orwell’s painful illness but it was also his coded blueprint of tyranny in the world, laying it barely, showing all of its components for us to recognize the signs and hopefully prevent it from establishing. Orwell was a Socialist and believed emphatically in the potential for disobedience to propel against
A rebel is a person who rises in opposition against an established government, a person who refuses allegiance to and resists a ruling party. Every society’s set of rules and regulations evokes the inner insurgent of a minority; George Orwell’s dystopia demonstrates the execution of pursuing one’s rebellious tendencies and the unconscious destruction that follows. In George Orwell’s 1984, Orwell juxtaposes rebellion and conformity by using various techniques. The portrayal of London, the Golden Country and the Prole District, the contrast between the Parson’s family unit and Winston’s relationship with Julia along with the depiction of mind versus body are all ways in which Orwell chooses to analogize rebellion and conformity. Within
The world is full of truth and lies. Anything and everything can be invented, even the idea of love. In many novels, characters discover the importance of truth from the world around them. However, in 1984, George Orwell confronts this notion from a different perspective, showing that lies do exist in the world. Throughout the novel, Orwell stresses that the nature of love is easily manipulated, which is demonstrated by Winston’s lack of self love, Julia’s act of deception and the Party’s relationship with the citizens of Oceania.
Abraham Lincoln once said, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character give him power”. This quotation demonstrates that most people live with difficulties and that helps understand the struggles making it more plausible to feel empathy. However, understanding and feeling empathy when you have privilege is much harder. Thus, the normality of abuse and corruption in someone with a position of power because they lose a sense of humanity. This central idea is shared in George Orwell’s 1984, a dystopian novel about extreme tyranny.
1984 is a novel in which its government has total control over what you do, how you think, and how you behave, George Orwell’s renowned novel prophesized his view of a 1984 dystopia. An ordinary, middle aged man named Winston Smith has gone about his life living the way everyone in Oceania did, doing what they were told without questioning anything, all while under the complete and utter control of their totalitarian government. He soon discovers the truth, and struggling to keep his secret, Winston goes on to find a group that fights the dictatorship. Despite how perfect the people in oceania may think their lives are, they are unaware of how the government portrays misleading information to them that they accept as facts, slowly shaping them
Winston starts off in 1984, as a Party member who does not believe or understand the Party’s motives. He rebels against the Party by writing in his diary. According to the Party, however, his writings would be considered thoughtcrime. The thoughtcrime that Winston was committing was that he was writing sayings that went against the Party’s beliefs. Winston, as he was writing, already knew that “he was already dead” because “thoughtcrime [WAS] death” (Orwell 28).
After the player serving as King Hamlet is murdered, Claudius goes ballistic, yelling for the lights to be turned on and storming out of the room. Hamlet interprets Claudius’s behavior as proof of his guilt and concludes that the claim made by the ghost was correct, and decides he will avenge his father by killing Claudius. As for this time in the play, Hamlet decides that although his father was murdered, he can acquire vengeance by killing the murderer
Furthermore, Hamlet makes a play up that imitates the way his father was murdered. Hamlet says to Horatio, “Watch him closely. I’ll stare at him too, and afterward, we’ll compare notes on him.” This is to confirm suspicion on King Claudius for the murder of Hamlet's father. When Hamlet gets questioned he has to refuse what they are asking and mislead them on their very own question.
His ultimate goal as shown in the play Hamlet wasn’t to just kill off Claudius, it was to expose him for what he was done and to allow for others to know the truth. But Hamlet knew that by doing so he had to have a divergent to cover his plan. This is supported by The Journal of Philosophy, the writer states “If Hamlet was really mad, his psychosis was that of an intellectual, a hypertrophy of that inner eye whose function it is to perceive meanings, relations and implications;” (Davis 630). As depicted by this quote Hamlet was aware of what was going on around him, although those around him believe that he was mad. While everyone saw Hamlet actions as madness Hamlet saw his actions as a facade, which allowed for those who spied on him to see only what he wanted them see.
Corruption Where there is corruption, there is dishonest and wrongdoing being conducted. In this tragedy play Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses King Claudius by revealing how power can lead to corruption. He does this by revealing King Claudius as the murderer of his own brother, and to tries to cover up his crime by trying to kill Hamlet but ends up killing Queen Gertrude and was later poisoned by Hamlet hand.
In the play Hamlet, deceiving illusions are often used to protect the truth from being a destructive force in the character’s lives. Many characters within the first two acts hide behind masks of corruption. In the first two acts, most of the characters make themselves seem good and honest, making it a difficult task for Hamlet to discover all the lies and people that have hidden objectives within them. Polonius, Claudius, and Hamlet all appear to be sincere and trustworthy but the reality is they all have other intentions and plans. Because they give off the impression that they are trustworthy and sincere, it is difficult for those around them to know what truly is going on.
In The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare the reader is brought into a story of a heartbroken son and a kingdom that is filled with deceit every which way. Focusing primarily on the deceit brought about by Prince Hamlet and the reasoning behind using so many lies and plots towards those around him. Hamlet can be described as having untrust for people and to even lead to his actions being seen as “madness” to others. For the people closest to him question whether his emotions and his motives for doing certain things are all just an act or if he truly has lost it after his father’s death. These continues behaviors and dishonesty throughout the story carry a certain motive that contributes a great meaning to the work as
During Act 2.2: lines 541-567 Hamlet at first was mourning and growing, and grieving over his father's death. To find himself mad not knowing what to do and wanting to get revenge on who killed his father. To realising that him standing around cursing is not going to get him anywhere, and that he needs to change his actions and do something about it. Then he came up with the brilliant idea that if his uncle, the murderer was able to see the play re enactment of him murdering his father, it would affect him so much would be driven to admit his crimes outloud.
This story is a story you need to pay close attention to because of the drastic twists and turns it takes. Hamlet is a character who knows what he wants and is focused on getting it no matter what stops him. Prince Hamlet had a father named Hamlet also known as the former king. His father passes away and
Claudius is seen at the beginning of the play to be a capable monarch as he deals diplomatically with such issues as the military threat from Norway and Hamlet's depression. It is not until the appearance of King Hamlet's Ghost in the courtyard that the reader questions his motives. During the play's progression he takes a turn for the worse by first resorting to spying, and, when that fails, murder. It is in Act III Scene 3, when Claudius forestalls Hamlet's revenge by confessing his sins to God in his own private chapel, that the audience can be sure of his guilt.