Any weapon can be deadly, but people want guns banned. Another example is that if there were a good guy with a gun the outcome would be different. In the same article, it states, “In this instance, however, we don 't have to ponder how different the outcome would have been had a "good guy with a gun" been present, since there was one: a police officer working extra duty. Despite being armed and exchanging gunfire with the shooter, the officer was unable to prevent him from gaining entrance to the club.” Sometimes a good guy can’t always save the day. Society today think that just because guns kill a majority of people, if the government bans them, everything in society will be perfect and there won’t be murders or a police officer can always eliminate the danger.
He supports his argument by saying that making strict gun laws will lead to a time where only the terrorists and bad guys will have guns, leaving the other citizens unarmed and unprotected. He believes that the people are responsible for killings with firearms and not the guns. The first and second debaters in text 2 share the same attitude towards gun laws as Donald Trump. The text compares guns with cars. It talks about that even though cars kill many people every year they are not banned, so why should guns be banned.
As of today, the citizens of the U.S. stereotype that Republicans want the ability to own guns without the interruption from the government, whereas the Democrats, want to be able to exterminate or at least limit the power to own guns. In fact, presidents have had similar views on developing new ways to handle gun issues by events that influence their ideas. . Presidential elections are a crucial part of shaping America, but a yet to be solved issue is gun control. Gun control has been a deciding factor in which way an election could go, whether the final decision is to pick the Republican party or the Democratic party.
The Bill of Rights is something the American people hold close to them, especially their right to bear arms. Recently there has been a lot of debate over implementing gun regulations without infringing on the rights of the people. While a position of this is expressed in Wayne LaPierre’s “Universal Background Checks Mean Gun Registration, Gun Bans and Confiscation”, Jeffrey Toobin’s “So You Think You Know the Second Amendment” provides a more valid position evaluating the issue of gun control. Universal background checks are a big discussion lately in our country’s current climate. Some see them as a step toward safety, and others see them as a red flag.
A sizable argument for gun control is that a higher number of guns mean a higher number of deaths. Statistics prove that that statement is incorrect. Certain restrictions on firearms have been implemented before, and results were not good. Also, many American citizens use guns everyday to protect themselves, their families, and others. "Gun control" laws are usually proposed on the grounds they will stop the criminal misuse of firearms, but criminals do not obey laws.
several traditional household items have safety devices. medicine bottles have safety caps and lawnmowers have safety devices to stop children from injury. Guns are very dangerous items and safety measures should be used to reduce the risk of injury. several anti-gun advocates fail to acknowledge the fact that Americans have used guns to stop over a million crimes from being committed every year. several pro-gun advocates believe that the more gun laws that are enacted, the less law abiding citizens are to use them to protect themselves.
This will therefore incline the government to have different ways of justifying gun control to make a safer environment for its own people. Gun control is not one issue that individuals worry about constantly. The gun violence touches every part of our society. It uncommonly increases the probability of accidental deaths, domestic violence that seeks to harm others and tries to commit suicide, puts children and young people at particular risk, and unexpectedly increases the chances of their death affecting colored communities. The control of weapons on some people is a crime, and for others it is a matter.
“There have been fewer than 20 terror-related deaths on American soil since 9/11 and about 364,000 deaths caused by privately owned firearms.” (Burnett, 2015) Using a second amendment is part of an old rule. We have to start changing this. Nowadays, the police are widely spread, which means people are quite safe and there is no need for keeping guns. If guns were to be banned, criminals would have to buy weapons from black markets and illegal places, which are maybe unreachable due to their lack of knowledge. When your enemy or opponent attacks you with a gun you probably will have absolutely no chance of escaping, so you are dead.
The Constitution states that we have the right to keep and bare arms, but there are some groups who have decided that 's not right. They will do anything to change the Second Amendment. This year there was a new gun legislation which adds to the long list of gun laws that already exists. In Colorado and Oregon a law was passed that says you can not buy a gun at a gun show without a background check, and a gun show not only by 3 or more persons to be. So in other words, it is illegal to exchange guns while hunting.
Regarding the statement that whether citizens in United States should own guns, some people would say that arming themselves can prevent tragedy from occurring, while others assume that owning guns has been caused some problems and risks of violent events yearly.I tend to agree that guns for citizens should be reasonably banned in United States because of to reduce deaths from shootings and feasible solutions of gun-banning life. Guns in America has been already caused a large number of problems such as shooting and killing events. Guns are sometimes not considered as defending tools. Instead, they become dangerous toys and even for entertainment because some of youth consider that holding a real gun like characters in movies excites them. Some of them do not have the consciousness that guns can be factually used to kill livings.