ipl-logo

How Did Stephen Douglass Win The Election Of 1860

692 Words3 Pages

In 1858 Stephen Douglas a spokesman for the Democratic Party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Abraham Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Douglas and Lincoln traveled across the state of Illinois in a series of debates hitting seven of the nine Congressional Districts. Douglas and Lincoln each took turns discussing party politics, the future of the nation, and the most important topic slavery. Who won the debates, is the question that is still being asked in the year 2016. Through my own personal study and review of The Lincolns Douglas Debates, it is my personal opinion that Stephen Douglas not Abraham Lincoln won the debates because of how the election system was set up in 1858, by …show more content…

At Freeport, Illinois, on August 27, 1858, in the second of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, Douglas stated that “slavery” could legally be barred from the territories if the territorial legislatures simply refused to enact the type of police regulations necessary to make slavery work. Without a legal framework and enforcement officials, slavery would be excluded” (Freeport Doctrine n.d.). This statement, though not too popular with the South, was listed as one of the reason that Douglas was able to retain his current seat in the U.S. …show more content…

Senate, however there are those who believe that it was actually Lincoln who won the debates, because even though Lincoln failed to win a Senate seat, his battle with Douglas had placed him into the national spotlight, and made him a serious presidential candidate for the US Presidency in 1861. More support for those who believe Lincoln won the debates was when Lincoln did go on to win the Presidential Election and become the 16th President of the United State. It is noted regarding the debates with Douglas that Lincoln himself said “his defeat was a slip and not a fall" (Digital History ID 3284,

Show More
Related

  • The Gadsden Purchase Treaty

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sectional Tensions Gadsden Purchase: The Gadsden Purchase was a treaty made in 1853 by James Gadsden of South Carolina. Gadsden was appointed by Secretary of War Jefferson Davis to secure a chunk of Mexico for a railway route. He was able to negotiate land along the southern tips of current day Arizona and New Mexico, the northern border of Mexico, for $10 million from Spaniard Santa Anna. The land Gadsden had managed to obtain would have made making a southern railroad much more simple than cutting through more northern mountains.

    Read More

  • Election Of 1860 Dbq Analysis

    180 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the most surprising election would be the election of 1860. In this election, Lincoln again confronted Douglas, who represented the Northern group of a strongly separated Democratic Party in addition to Breckinridge and Bell. The declaration of Lincoln 's triumph flagged the severance of the Southern states, which since the start of the year had been openly undermining withdrawal if the Republicans picked up the White House. When Lincoln was instated on March 4, 1861, seven states had withdrawn, and the Confederate States of America had been formally settled, with Jefferson Davis as its chose president. After one month, the American Civil War started when Confederate powers under General P.G.T. Beauregard opened fire on Union-held Fort

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Dred Scott's Speech: The House Divided

    169 Words  | 1 Pages

    It was June 16 in 1858, at the Illinois Republican convention in Springfield. Lincoln just started off his bid for the U.S. Senate with a big speech. That speech is called the "House Divided" speech. He believed that the recent Supreme Court decision on Dred Scott was a big part of the Democratic. That was lead legalized slavery in all states The court 's decision was that Dred Scott had to live in a free state and remain as a slave.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Anonymous Lincoln

    266 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Infamous Lincoln-Douglas Disputations The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 hold great significance in America's political history. These seven debates for Senate drew tens of thousands of attendees to several cities around Illinois. Its main arguments brought forth slavery's complex division in America as well as the separation of the union because of it. Although Lincoln did not win the election, these debates proved to be the platform for Lincoln's principles and helped his rise towards presidency.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Lincoln And Douglas Debates

    853 Words  | 4 Pages

    The democratic south, represented by Douglas, who took the principle approach. Douglas was also the incumbent candidate at the time, whose party dominated Illinois politics. The republican north, represented by Lincoln, who approached politics with moral principle. The Whig Party was both candidates primary target as they were in between both beliefs due to the issue of slavery - which Lincoln argued to be a moral issue. Later in the novel Guelzo uses statistical tables to prove why the debates had little effect on the outcome of the election.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass Political Candidate Analysis

    66 Words  | 1 Pages

    Frederick Douglas, as a slave, lived on a plantation with two other “sister” plantations. The main plantation was so prestigious that a slave would have to be voted on to be able to work on that plantation. Frederick Douglass used an analogy to compare what the political candidate had to do and what a slave had to do to get voted on by the plantation leader.

    Read More

  • How Did Stephen Douglass Encourage The Support Of Popular Sovereignty

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stephen Douglas, an advocate of popular sovereignty, and Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate, were both running to represent Illinois in the United States Senate. These two men met in a sequence of seven debates before they battled for office of presidency in the election of 1858. Slavery eventually became the main issue discussed repeatedly in each of the debates, due to the Mexican War adding new territories left to be assessed as free soil or not. During this time, the Compromise of 1850 was a temporary fix to the sectional issues for the states that made the decision to participate in the extension of slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1854 brought the issue back up again.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln's Electical Essay: The Election Of 1864

    835 Words  | 4 Pages

    The leader of an entire nation and its military forces needs to have a certain intuition and connection with its country. Without this, the leader would seem more like a ruler, which is why electing a president is a more appealing choice to most Americans. In the election of 1864, the fate of our whole country was indirectly affected by the outcome. 3 years into the Civil war, the union was electing, or reelecting, its new president. Abraham Lincoln and George McClellan both ran for president in 1864, but Lincoln came out on top after a very long fight to win for the presidency.

    Read More

  • How Did Stephen Douglass Support The Freedom Doctrine

    387 Words  | 2 Pages

    Competing with Stephen Douglas, he was in the election to become the Senator of Illinois. This state election took place in 1858. He debated with Douglas face to face. There were seven debates held in Illinois. Stephen Douglas also supported the Freedom Doctrine.

    Read More

  • Relationship And Conflicts In In The Radical And The Republican

    863 Words  | 4 Pages

    After this act, the president’s political position moved to emphasize the importance of national improvements towards slavery being the new center of attention. James Oakes argues in the text that during Lincoln’s 1860 presidential election campaign in order to gain the vote of the majority non abolitionist in America, Abraham Lincoln used calculated racism to get votes from the high population of non-abolitionists by diverting questions on racial

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Lincoln And Douglas Debates

    331 Words  | 2 Pages

    While the debates did not address the rights of Black Americans, it did allow the public to see both Lincoln and Douglas in a brighter light. Douglas publically stated that Lincoln had favored race equality, calling him a Radical Republican and therefore hurting his chances at ever getting a position in politics. Lincoln then challenged Douglas to a series of debates between late August and mid October in Illinois. Douglas accused Lincoln and Trumbull of conspiring to bring down Whig party in order to get their dream of abolishing slavery and getting into office. One person commented that these debates showed how much American politics have changed over the last two years, and will continue to change in the years coming.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

    691 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July

    511 Words  | 3 Pages

    Coming from slavery himself, he despised the Fugitive Slave Law for the simple fact that slavery “has no right to exist anywhere.” I find a critical part of his speech, is the attention getting device. Since this speech was given on the Fourth of July, Douglas starts off his speech by sharing gratitude for our nation’s founding fathers.

    Read More

  • Republican Party Dbq

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Republican Party was committed to restricting the growth of slavery, and its victory in the election of 1860 was the trigger for secession acts by Southern states. The debate before 1860 was mainly focused on the Western territories, especially Kansas and the popular sovereignty controversy. Lincoln was nominated as the Republican candidate for president in the election of 1860. Lincoln was opposed to the expansion of slavery into new areas, but held that the federal government was prevented by the Constitution from banning slavery in states where it already existed. His plan was to halt the spread of slavery, and to offer monetary compensation to slave-owners in states that agreed to end slavery (see Compensated emancipation).

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Douglas, was an important election that would, and did, go down in history. Lincoln had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, created by Stephen Douglas, which lead him into becoming a Republican. Here, nobody was able to Compromise. He ran against Stephen Douglas, and won the election with getting one hundred eighty electoral votes, and Douglas getting twelve (Southern Democrat Breckinridge seventy-two, and Constitutional Union Bell getting thirty-nine) (Doc H).

    Read More

More about How Did Stephen Douglass Win The Election Of 1860

Open Document