In the same article, it states, “In this instance, however, we don 't have to ponder how different the outcome would have been had a "good guy with a gun" been present, since there was one: a police officer working extra duty. Despite being armed and exchanging gunfire with the shooter, the officer was unable to prevent him from gaining entrance to the club.” Sometimes a good guy can’t always save the day. Society today think that just because guns kill a majority of people, if the government bans them, everything in society will be perfect and there won’t be murders or a police officer can always eliminate the danger. These accusations are not true and it’s all based on the place and time.
Now the reason because of that incline with women is that women are a bigger target for rapists, muggers, and thieves. Now robbery and assault victims who draw a handgun in defence 55.5% of the time the criminal will flee. So if you think about it if someone draws a handgun while you're trying to rob someone your instincts with tell you to back off and run because it could be loaded, the safety could be off and you could get
She did not understand why anyone but soldiers and police need guns. As an advocate for gun control, she worked to make it harder to get a gun. In response to people having firearms for self defense, she responded by saying that they are paranoid. In regards to gun owners, she
The main evidence here that proves my point, is “A background check did not stop this killer, but tighter background checks can keep war weapons out of the hands of those who are known to be mentally unstable.” This helps me prove my point because the killer would not have obtained a gun if stricter background checks occured. Without a gun, the killer become weak, and unable to kill people. This would make us much safer if killers don’t have access to guns. Opponents of my argument may say that many people, including unstable people can go to gun shows, illegal dealers, and out of the country to obtain guns to shoot people.
This needs to change. There is nothing protecting the citizens of Florida from tragedies like the shooting at Majority Stoneman Douglas High School from occurring again. People need to realize that this is not an either gun or mental health issue. It is the fact that gun control laws do not stop the mentally ill from obtaining a dangerous firearm. Congress should be concerned with improving those
According to the article Battleground America: one nation, under a gun by Jill Lepore, it says “ One in three Americans knows someone has been shot” (14). I understand many people owning a gun for self protection however when people are given the right, they take it for granted. They
Many people argue that we need more mental health services or that it is a safety issue and therefore we should have more armed security at schools, concerts, large events. However,
Many of the victims of shootings demand changes. “Similar laws put guns in the hands of shooters who killed 14 people during an office Christmas party in California in 2015, 49 people in a Florida nightclub in 2016, and 58 people at a country music festival in Las Vegas in 2017,” (Text 1, Lines 34-36). For three consecutive years there has at least been one headlining public mass shooting on innocent civilians. The people wants change, and they want it now. Victims and some of the public want people who buy guns to pass mental evaluations, background checks, and to be a certain age to buy a firearm.
Gun control laws should be reinforced and practiced in all states regardless of how many shootings take place. Furthermore, suicide rates have increased, and in general there is no actual control over suicide with gun
Gun control is a very popular subject in our society today. Citizens of our country do not feel safe considering the series of events that have happened in the last two decades. The term gun control is used to describe how firearms may be legally produced, sold, and used. There are laws made to regulate who may buy or own these firearms and provide requirements for registration, licensing, and carrying of concealed weapons. “While public safety is at the root of most federal, state, and local regulations, many people base their opposition to gun control on the language of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Nowadays, crimes like raped, homicide, or robbery are always we heard or read in daily newspapers, internet or television that happens in our lifetime frequently. This situation make people feel not safe to be outside their house or when they are walk alone down the street, and because of this dangerous situation, it lead some people to make a risk decision to having an own firearm. Having a gun in their hand make them feel safer but we also know that it also will lead to other serious problem and because of that a new law has been created, it is call gun control. System that modulate the production, transaction, transfer, ownership, modification, or use of weapons commonly refer to gun control. In Malaysia a gun politics refer to the legislation
More guns does not necessarily mean that there is more danger. This has been a very controversial topic for years. When people get asked this questions they most likely think ‘Well of course! More guns = more crime!’. Most of the time when people think of guns they think of danger and someone getting hurt.
Every time a shooting happens. It feels like we have the same conversations. We ask the same questions. The debate never changes. We have a script for things like this and everyone has a general idea of what people will say.
Has gun control ever effectively reduced crime and violence? Many studies by multiple different institutes have evidence that shows that this has never been the case, in fact crime has dropped from the ‘60s to the present. Gun control has never and will never work as other countries have shown through their attempts with gun laws as well as the mounting number of shootings that is undaunted by any regulations the government can enact. All throughout the 1960s, crime rates in the US were out of control and many people did not know where to turn. Finally in 1968, a man named Richard Nixon runs for president of the United States with a promise to end the domestic violence problem (Gillespie).
No guns. no violence? Months ago, the news channels broadcasted the several mass shootings with took place, mostly at eventful areas. The shooting at L.A. was without a doubt, the most shocking and mournful accident. Ever since then, fear started entering the minds of citizens, questions rose about the restrictions of using guns and to maximize the difficulty to obtain firearms.