Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
of the Constitution to the states for consideration. To amend the Articles of Confederation had required unanimous approval of the states. The delegates agreed to change the approval process for the Constitution so only nine of the thirteen states had approved. After this, the new government of the United States would come into existence.
Though the delegates at Philadelphia had produced the Constitution, it still had to be accepted by the people. Before the Constitution could go into effect, nine states needed to ratify it. To get people more used to the idea of the Constitution, state legislatures set up special ratifying conventions to consider the document. By late 1787 these conventions started to meet, however Rhode Island stood apart. Its leaders opposed the Constitution from the beginning and therefore
…show more content…
Rhode Island’s leaders were considered Antifederalists or people who didn’t approve the Constitution. Antifederalists criticized the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms and believed that no government could be trusted to protect the freedom of its citizens. Several state conventions took a stand and announced that they would not ratify the Constitution without the addition of a bill of rights. One Antifederalist named Mercy Otis Warren expressed the problem faced by many Antifederalists and admitted the need for a strong government but feared it. But the Constitution still had supporters called Federalists. Three of the nation’s most gifted political thinkers ,James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, also backed the Constitution. They all worked together to write a series of essays explaining and defending the Constitution. These essays, called the Federalist Papers, appeared in newspapers around the country and were widely read. The Federalist Papers were later published as a book and sent to delegates at the remaining ratifying conventions.
Why Is The Massachusetts Farmers Opposed To The Constitution Dbq
598 Words | 3 PagesAnswer: Massachusetts farmers opposed the Constitution in light of the fact that they felt it ensured exchange more than horticulture, the Federalist Papers were distributed there to pick up backing for it. Virginia and New York would not ratify until the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. In light of the opposition, John Hancock at the Massachusetts ratifying tradition suggested that a bill of rights be included as the first gathering of amendments to the Constitution. Ratification in Massachusetts and pretty much all whatever remains of the uncommitted states relied on upon the comprehension that receiving a bill of rights would be the new government's first request of business. There were the opposition which was made out of assorted
Anti-Federalists: Founder Of Popular Democracy
83 Words | 1 PagesAnti-federalists. The Anti-federalists were the founders of popular democracy in the United States. 4 The Anti-federalists denounced the proposed Constitution as a betrayal of the democratic spirit of 1776 and the American Revolution itself.
Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay
616 Words | 3 PagesIn the years 1787 and 1788 right after the Constitutional Convention, many people argued over the context of the constitution. The ratification started when the Congress turned the Constitution over to the state legislatures. Because most of the framers had already decided to discard the Articles of Confederation when drafting the Constitution, the lack of people following the articles made the legislatures feel that an unanimous vote was unnecessary. The delegates agreed that approval from only 9 of the 13 states would be adequate to ratify the United States Constitution. However, the process to ratifying the constitution was difficult including groups of people and regions who supported or opposed the ratification.
Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
1505 Words | 7 PagesThe Articles of Confederation, first adopted in 1781, represented the former colonist’s first attempt to establish a new government after the Revolutionary War. Some of the problems Americans faced after the Revolutionary War were problems with governmental debt that remained when the war was over. Soon Americans started to find disadvantages to the Articles of Confederation, which they considered changes that could possibly improve the economic strengths of the nation, allowing the composition of trade barriers among the states would discourage specialization and lower voluntary trade. The lack of dependable source of revenues for the central government would make it strenuous for the newer nation to defend themselves from attack, which is
Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesThe Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.
How Did James Madison Contribute To The Constitution
715 Words | 3 PagesJames Madison once said, "[the Constitution was not] the offspring of a single brain." This is true, however, Madison, who is known as the Father of the Constitution, certainly played a huge role in its writing and ratification. In fact if he had not written the Federalist Papers the Constitution might not have been passed. Also, it was he who suggested the use of a three branch government.
The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists
99 Words | 1 PagesThe Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of
Principles Related To The Constitution Of 1787
398 Words | 2 PagesThe constitution was signed by delegates in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787. The government was not strong at the time and states worked like independent countries. At the 1787 convention, delegates found a way for the US to have a government with three branches,executive, legislative and judicial along with checks and balances to make sure no one would have more power than the other. Some features of principles incorporated are the amending process,Limited government and checks and balances. The Amending technique is given by the Congress with ⅔ vote by the House of Reps and the Senate or a agreement that wants two-thirds of the State legislaturesThe right to revise the Constitution is obtained from Article V.None of the 27 amendments
The Articles Of Confederation Was Ratified In 1787
949 Words | 4 PagesAfter the 13 colonies had declared independence from Britain and King George, they were quick to draft their own constitution. Most of which was inspired by Enlightenment thinkers and their philosophies, like those of John Locke, Montesquieu, and copious amount of more. The Articles of Confederation first drafted in the year 1777, but was not ratified until 1781. Nonetheless, this was quickly changed when people realized that the Articles of Confederation was ineffective. Therefore, it was replaced and led to the Constitution to be drafted.
Three Branches Of The Federalist
360 Words | 2 PagesThe ratification of the constitution first needed to be approve of two thirds of the thirteen state governments before it became accepted as the law of the land. While there certainly were people who were happy with the constitution there are also many who were suspicious of it. Those people who were afraid was because of a strong powerful federal government. To kind of ease people’s fears and to state what it was all about they wrote a series of essays that are known as the Federalist papers.
Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
748 Words | 3 PagesNine states had to ratify for the Constitution to go in effect, not all agreed with the ratification. The United States Government overcame the weakness of the Articles of Convention
What Are The Benefits Of The Articles Of Confederation
1172 Words | 5 PagesCongress soon realized that the Article of Confederation wasn 't as strong of a constitution they hoped for. In fact, James Madison believed the Article was just a "rope of sand" that would hold the nation together. The nation they had passionately fought for was breaking apart due to a flimsy constitution and something had to happen before matters turn to worse. Things had to happen before anything more could become worse. In February of 1787, fifty-five delegates from twelve states of America, came together to create the new Constitution.
Apush Chapter 1 Key Terms Essay
720 Words | 3 Pages3. Each state had a convention and nine out of thirteen states had to approve the Constitution in order for it to go into effect. 2. Comprehension and Critical Thinking 4.a. Congress under the Articles of Confederation could not regulate trade or collect taxes.
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
724 Words | 3 PagesThe Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.
Us Constitution Still Relevant Today Essay
1012 Words | 5 PagesThese are the people that disagree with the constitution. These people believe the constitution will only make this country an even worse nation. These are the people that supported the crown of King George the III. Similar beliefs to the bill of rights. Many people agree with it and many people disagree with it.
More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
Why Is The Massachusetts Farmers Opposed To The Constitution Dbq
598 Words | 3 PagesAnti-Federalists: Founder Of Popular Democracy
83 Words | 1 PagesRatifying The Constitution Dbq Essay
616 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
1505 Words | 7 PagesExplain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesHow Did James Madison Contribute To The Constitution
715 Words | 3 PagesThe Argument Against The Anti-Federalists
99 Words | 1 PagesPrinciples Related To The Constitution Of 1787
398 Words | 2 PagesThe Articles Of Confederation Was Ratified In 1787
949 Words | 4 PagesThree Branches Of The Federalist
360 Words | 2 PagesWeaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
748 Words | 3 PagesWhat Are The Benefits Of The Articles Of Confederation
1172 Words | 5 PagesApush Chapter 1 Key Terms Essay
720 Words | 3 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
724 Words | 3 PagesUs Constitution Still Relevant Today Essay
1012 Words | 5 Pages