In an age of political correctness, people love to root for the character who doesn’t seem to follow any social confines, a morally flawed character, and a character who is unapologetic in their actions. But what is it within our human nature that is drawn to these morally wrong characters. My intrigue with this led me to put on the production of Richard III. A character who is so clearly immoral, yet we find ourselves almost liking. As a director it was a challenge to create someone who is admirable and trustworthy to the audience, when they are so deceitful and evil in all other aspects.
The idea of the antihero has always fascinated me. These characters are flawed, the likes of Annalise Keatings, Dexter Morgan, Lady MacBeth, Severus Snape,
…show more content…
He grew up within the wealth of his family’s mansion and lived a lavish, easy life. Yet his wealth had a catch, Richard came from a line of drug lords. A position that Richard never stood to inherit, rather one that his younger nephews would. Richard was misunderstood, never truly fitting in with his family, underestimated and overlooked. His physical appearance was such a crucial consideration in his characterisation, because as a director it was my first opportunity to create sympathy for him. Before you have heard him say a word you feel bad for him because of his deformed appearance, you see his physical exclusion from his high society, as he watches the extravagant party from his hallway. It was vital that, upon first glance he is not physically powerful. A trait that he so expertly exploits to manipulate those around him to gain …show more content…
Within the safety of his home he carefully orchestrated crimes until he found himself in power, protected by his hitman. A carefully constructed idea of security, controlled by his manipulation. He becomes lonely, isolated, and increasingly paranoid. This decent leads to his eventual downfall, a downfall that takes place outside of the safety of his mansion in the rough streets of Mexico. This isolation and loneliness leads you to almost feel genuinely sorry for him when he lays there haunted by his drug induced hallucinations by the ghosts of those he killed.
The costuming was also very important to identifying the context and differentiating between Richards’s alias and enemy’s. The costuming of his nephews are light coloured and almost innocent, but they wear the family’s necklace to show how their fates are predetermined by their power. Most characters are adorned in dark rich tones and lavish materials to further signify their status. As Richard gets more powerful his costuming too gets more corrupt and extreme, wearing leather and more bling. Those who are against Richard or who question his moral wear lighter traditionally ‘good’ colours,
In the beginning of the play he is displayed as a man with great integrity, but as the play develops he loses the most important characteristics to him, but ultimately regains some back and
The tv show Dexter is an example that illustrate how an antihero can be depicted. In the tv show, Dexter, the main character solves murders as part of his job in Miami. He is a Miami-based blood spatter expert, but at the same time he commits murders. He is a serial killer who kills people who are guilty of a crime. Killing guilty individuals is a part of Dexter’s explanation of why they had to die.
Sympathy is a common form of manipulation which is seen in politics often, thus it’s important to highlight how sympathy is portrayed in Richard III. Because of the emotional connection that voters feel towards politicians as a result of sympathy, voters often forget the corrupted side of a politician, giving them their vote as they believe that the politician deserves it. Arguably, this was seen in the past national elections, as many people believed Hillary Clinton had gained sympathy votes by sharing her struggles regarding sexism present in the world, and the gullible voters had felt an emotional connection, thus giving her their votes. This historical-modern connection proves
He chose to move about more carefully, go out of his way to walk by people, just to make it seem like he wasn’t following them. he even chooses to whistle classical music at night when walking to calm people’s paranoia. In richard’s experiences he has to conform
The costumes represent the rank in society for these characters. An example is Desmond, who wears extravagant clothing showing she has money. Mostly, throughout the film, she wears black clothing, which represented her sadness, and anger of accepting her time in Hollywood that ended many years back. Another example, Gillis, who in the beginning wears lower class clothes because he cannot afford anything else. Eventually, he becomes a gigolo and ends up wearing expensive suits that many people cannot afford.
Antiheroes are not what most people think of them, but are Antagonist who try to stand up to the big a powerful usually defending the little guy but if the little guy gets in their way they will crush the little guy. The Antihero story starts like this at first, they conform to society but not fitting in
Richard has always felt the unjust of race, and has felt how segregation made it hard for him to have a future. But when he gets a chance to get revenge on the whites, he refuses when he thinks ”Who wanted to look them straight in the face, who wanted to walk and act like a man.(200)” Stealing went against his morals of the right way to succeed and would not help the community appearance to the whites. The community as a whole is very religous but Richard does not share these beliefs, even with the persistence of his friends and family he says ”Mama, I don't feel a thing.(155)” This caused his friends to beg him, but in face of rejection they leave him alone.
Initially, Miller establishes the antihero as the character of Abigail Williams who defies the routine odds of society in a devilish manner. To begin, Miller sparks the start of the Hero’s Journey by depicting the cross over into the unknown world when Reverend Parris witnesses Tituba and the children dancing in
Richard was ugly and he uses his deformity as the reason why life has been unfair to him. Richard admitted during his first speech being “Deformed, unfinished, sent before my time” (Shakespeare 1.1) He claims to be evil as a result of being rejected and unloved. And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover, To entertain there fair well-spoken days, I am determined to prove a villain” (Shakespeare 1.1)
First of all, he has a contradictory nature that complicates him in defining himself. Therefore, the narrator does not have his character settled up properly. Yet, the intelligence of this man is overdeveloped, that makes him even more stupid. He does not know how to respect others, since he has never experienced real feelings and sympathy from others.
King Richard II is a tragic figure. Richard II’s noble descent made him in line for becoming the king. In Shakespeare’s historical saga, King Richard II becomes a powerful king, then denounces his kingship, and finally killed by Sir Pierce of Exton, a supporter of King Bolingbroke (Pilkington, 1993). These actions make King Richard II a tragic figure by definition of a person moving from prosperity to disaster (Pritchett, 2009). King Richard II was providing good leadership until his uncle, John of Gaunt, died.
I think Winston is a good example of an antihero. He is aware of the failings of his society, but lacks the will and skills necessary to really do anything about it. I think one of his major flaws is his bad judge of character. He originally doesn 't trust Julia, someone who cared deeply about him, and he thinks O 'Brien is his ally, when really he was against Winston all along. Trusting O 'Brien played a huge role in Winston 's downfall.
Furthermore, the supernatural plays a major role in exposing Richard 's evil deeds and draws a light on absolute truth and retribution. Unlike Shakespeare 's Henry VI plays, Richard III is especially focused on divine justice and the
I believe that Richard II is a tragic. King Richard is first described as a powerful character. He commands the respect of a true king and orchestrates the realm with full command. I think that he was a smart man for his own good. The King is unfortunately resolute in his position, and it is at the moment he commits his tragic flaw.
Richard II's concept of kingship is expressed as a wild mixture of selfishness, anger, adversity and turmoil (Shakespeare & Watts, 2013). He is a king that takes away from individuals to benefit his own well being. Richard II uses his charisma to gain him popularity throughout the play, but he is careless and leads his country to a thoughtless war among Ireland. His actions are not thought of as being the appropriate action to take while king. The mixture of his kingship is made up of selfishness mainly.