As the phenomenon of the Internet becomes more accessible to most groups of people, it has been seen as both appreciation and criticism. In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr argues that the way we think and the style of reading has changed because the Internet is easy to use. In the article “Small Change,” Malcolm Gladwell discusses the pros and cons of social media on activism in modern times as compared through activism in the 1960’s. In Douglas Rushkoff’s documentary “Generation Like,” we gain a deeper understanding of how companies are increasingly working to target and exploit a teen’s quest for identity by empowering them thorough social media. In this paper I will explain how the Internet and social media have influenced …show more content…
I can … become a struggle."(p. 92). Using the example of his friends who have similar experience but this evidence is not strong enough though it acts as a useful example to help his audience relate to his ethos argument. Carr later does supports his claim with logos by referring to a study in the UK, which found that people using their sites "exhibited 'a form of skimming activity,' hopping from one source to another and rarely returning to any source they'd already visited."(p. 93). We see the argument that the Internet is a useful tool but it is negatively impacting our …show more content…
With social networking and social media widely available to almost everyone in the world today, they are still not strong enough for spreading social movements to start revolution. Malcolm Gladwell argues that strong social movements, for example the civil rights movement, require strong ties in both the participants and hierarchical organizations whereas social networking websites has weak ties and lacks organization. Gladwell supports this by saying, “activism succeeds not by motivating people to make a real sacrifice but by motivating them to do the things that people do when they are not motivated enough to make a real sacrifice.”(p.
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr writes about how he has a challenging time reading books that after a few pages he loses concentration and that his mind wanders to other things. The reading that use to come natural to him no longer does and he believes the internet is to blame, what once took a few hours searching through multiple books in the library for information now can be found in a few minutes searched on the internet. He also mentions other bloggers that confess how they either no longer read books or do not read articles that are longer than a few paragraphs or that they just skim articles on the internet. Carr lists many posts from other people also from different years some going back to the 1980s.
In his article, Is Google Making Us Stupid?, the author Nicholas Carr describes the many ways the use of search engines have on our comprehension. He writes, “The more they use the Web , the more they have to fight to focused on long pieces of writing”(Carr). Most people who often searched the Web, limit themselves from actually learning. For example, googling questions to find answers quicker than actually reading the text limits one's knowledge. Maryanne Wolf, a Tufts University cognitive neuroscientist also stated that search engines is affecting the way we read and write.
In Nicholas Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, he claims that the Internet is affecting the way humans process information. Carr expresses that the Internet is significantly decreasing our ability to concentrate and process thoughts for an extensive period of time. He believes this is because of our large dependence on the Internet. Carr is able to connect with this idea as he feels that, like other Internet users, his cognitive behavior has changed. He determined that his way of processing information has transformed as he has made a habit of merely skimming the text and not stopping to analyze and take in the information that he is reading.
In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that, due to mankind’s constant use of the internet, people are losing their ability to read long pieces of literature. He says the internet may offer a faster answer to a question one might have, but the experience of actually having to research a topic for days at a time lessens the actual knowledge that is gained. Carr speaks of his own way of thinking being changed as his use of the internet became greater. He also states that he is not the only one being effected; offering up instances where his friends’ thought processing has also begun to dwindle for their constant use of the internet. Carr even references how Friedrich Nietzsche’s writing changed after he began to use
Claiming if you don’t like Google, you can just use another search engine doesn’t refute Carr’s argument at all. He is expressing concern with the concept of instant and shortened information, Google is just the most
Individuals are losing fixation simpler than previously and rather than truely perusing material, they are skimming and rationally taking note of what has all the earmarks of being vital. On the web, which quite a bit of our opportunity is spent, we frequently skim to get the data we require then move onto the following thing. He clarifies the impacts the web has on its clients. Carr clarifies that the web has prepared out brains to skim and gather more data. There is so much accessible that no doubt if the mind was a PC that the cerebrum would in certainty require a bigger hard drive to store the greater part of the data.
Carr believe the internet changes the way we think. In my opinion, Carr story was to influence, not persuade. In Nicholas Carr’s essay, “Is google making us
Writing Project 2 – Writing with a Text Imagine travelling back in time to an age where books used to be a dream, and only the privileged had the access to knowledge. Now, fortunately, such a dream no longer exists. About two decades ago, us humans were introduced to the Worldwide Web. This was a major technological advancement because it was no longer just the wealthy that had access to the information, but rather, knowledge was at the fingertips of every single human being.
The Impactful Internet In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” he writes about how the internet is impacting our need for efficiency, our concentration, and our thought process. He travels back in time and explores modern problems to paint a picture of our future. Carr connects different main ideas throughout his writing.
From his analysis, it appears that, Carr, in order to convince public opinion or its readers, uses ethos to make credible its sources on the fact that everything that says about the Web is true. Using his personal experience, he will soon realize that he was not the only one to feel these negative effects of Google when he said: “I’m not the only one” (Carr). He cites an example of bloggers like him defending the same causes like Scott Karp who said: “I was a lit major in college, and used to be [a] voracious book reader.” Karp wrote:” What happened?” (Karp), and speculates on the answer: “What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed, i.e. I’m just seeking convenience, but because the way I THINK has changed?”(Karp), and Bruce Friedman who said, “I now have almost totally lost the ability to read and absorb a longish article on the web or in print.
The internet has been our best friend now a day. Nicholas Carr, a Pulitzer nominee writer, wants to inform people who care about intellectual issues, about what the internet is doing to our brains. He felt changes in his own brain, his friends have noticed it mention in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Writer, Joe Keohane, informs to American voter around midterm elections in his article “How Facts Backfire” that we don’t really take in the actual information and it mislead us to the wrong facts. Both describe the benefits of using the internet but also how it affects our brains.
All information in the world could be accessed at the same place through the same search engine. Nicholas Carr is an American writer who usually writes about the problems of technology combined with world's culture. His books includes Does IT Matter? (2004), The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google (2008), The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (2010), and The Glass Cage: Automation and Us (2014).
In the article” Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr is trying focus on the audience to capture the audience attention. Also the internet is making people mentally handicapped. People are becoming lazy. Instead of analyzing the book to answer the question, people are typing the questions in on the internet to get the answers the lazy way. People’s brains are negatively affected.
Could looking up information on the internet possibly make you dumber instead of smarter? People all over the world has smartphones, smartwatches, and laptops but do not focus on how or if these items have an effect on them. In his article, Is Google Making Us Stupid?, Nicholas Carr talks about the internet,how it has many detrimental effects on the people who use it. When Carr began to analyze the internet, he referenced the movie 2001:
Macie Hicks Social media has undeniably impacted the 21st century immensely, but the debate that decides whether this impact is beneficial or undermining, still continues today. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook, claims “We’ve gone from a world of isolated communities to one global community, and we are all better off for it.”, while Jenna Wortham, the author of Is Social Media Disconnecting Us From the Big Picture, provided the other side of the debate when she stated “Social media is my portal into the rest of the world - my periscope into the communities next to my community, into how the rest of the world thinks and feels. And it completely failed me.” In accordance with Wortham, I have come to conclude that social media had promising intentions of unifying different communities, but failed to successfully fulfill its purpose due to human’s inability to welcome and consider new ideas.