Summary Of The Perils Of Indifference
American Jewish writer, and political activist Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech “The Perils of Indifference” to send a strong message to the audience. As a survivor of the Holocaust, he supports his claim through his speech explaining the dangers of indifference from first hand experience. Specifically in his speech he refers to himself, “A young Jewish boy [..] woke up in a place of eternal infamy called Buchenwald”(par 1).. In addition, Wiesel use of rhetorical questions is for the audience to question or to think about indifference. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people about indifference in order to “save” our future. He establishes a serious tone for readers by using stylistic and rhetorical devices such as imagery, repetition and …show more content…
For example, during World War I, the Turkish nationalist government oversaw the deportation and killing of an estimated 1.1 to 1.8 million “to put an end to the Armenian question. The means for this are quite simple and consist of the extermination of the Armenian nation” (“Past Genocide”). Armenians in Eastern Turkey. April 24, 1915 was the beginning of the Armenian Genocide. Armenians were deported from cities and towns in Asia Minor and Turkish Armenia. Hundreds of Armenian religious, political, and intellectual leaders were gathered up, exiled, and even murdered in areas of Anatolia. Within the next few months, Armenians serving in the Ottoman army were disarmed and placed in forced labor battalions where they were either starved or …show more content…
Their names were Hans and Sophie Scholl. They were part of a group called “The White Rose.” They wanted to help but not using violence as “the group had no wish to throw bombs, or to cause any injury to human life” than the Nazis. In fact, they choose to influence others to go against the Nazis ideas and militarism. “We will not be silenced” that was on the first leaflet that they had made as The White Rose. At the end, the Scholl siblings used their voice to go against Hitler and his reign. They were arrested but not tortured instead they were sentenced to death by guillotine the most inhuman way to kill. The siblings are an example of people not being bystander and not being indifference to the Holocaust. They are what Wiesel wants people to do; to not be bystanders and to stand
'The Perils Of Indifference' By Elie Wiesel
1129 Words | 5 PagesWiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.
Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech
556 Words | 3 PagesHe shares personal experiences from his past, “A young Jewish boy from…Carpathian Mountains woke up…eternal infamy called Buchenwald.” Who better to relay a message of caring and getting involved, than someone who maintained his character and used his experiences to educate others through his writings and speeches. One could have been transformed to preach hate and the ability to prevent such experiences for others. Wiesel tugs at the audience’s
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
797 Words | 4 PagesHolocaust survivor and author of the novel, Night, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference is not only a sin, but is an act of dehumanization. He begins to develop his claim by defining the word “indifference”, then enlightens the audience about his personal experiences living through the war. Finally he asks the audience how they will change as they enter a new millennium. Wiesel’s purpose throughout his speech is to convince his audience not to be indifferent to those who were, and are, being treated cruelly and unjust. He creates tones of tranquility, disappointment, abandonment, and happiness in order for his audience to see his perspective during the horrific times of the Holocaust.
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
455 Words | 2 PagesFirstly, in “The Perils of Indifference”, Elie Wiesel uses rhetorical questions to get us thinking on the thought of what life would be like for people after the Holocaust. “Does it mean that we have learned from the past?” “Has the human being become less indifferent and more human?” “Have we really learned from our experiences?”
Rhetorical Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel
590 Words | 3 PagesA quarrel is better than a cold war, and we better remind ourselves the situations that we choose to be indifference toward our friends and families. Elie Wiesel urges people to face their own indifference, addressing that indifference denies the humanity of victims. This whole speech is based on the ethos of Wiesel, conveying the message that he himself symbolizes humanity. Wiesel refers to his own experience during the Holocaust, the most infamous and evil event in history.
Perils Of Indifference
854 Words | 4 PagesIs it possible for human rights to be actualized for everyone? Can there be true equality? Is it feasible to believe everyone can have all 30 human rights? No, it’s impossible for Human Rights to be actualized for all people. There will always be people who crave power and will violate any human rights to obtain it and people who wouldn’t attempt to stop them.
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference
848 Words | 4 PagesHe also inform the audience about the indifference that happened during the holocaust .Elie wiesel uses another rhetorical questioning to start off his second main idea and to bring the audience attention to what he is about to point out. In his speech he said, “ what is indifference?” To make the listener ask themselves do they really know what the meaning of indifference is referring to the event. He also use the technique of comparing and contrasting by stating “more dangerous than anger and hatred”.
The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
621 Words | 3 PagesNobel Peace Prize-Winning Author, Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” warns people about the dangers of indifference. He supports his claim by describing a scenario with a young Jewish boy and him being saved by American soldiers from a concentration camp. Wiesel also supports his claim by telling a story about how indifference is worse than anger and hatred through descriptive words. He finally uses imagery to give us a descriptive image of what indifference could do for the future. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people of the danger of indifference in order to inform people of all the harm indifference can because.
Pathos In Elie Wiesel's Speech
466 Words | 2 PagesThis pertains to the reader’s feelings as it suggests how inhuman the Holocaust was. Moreover, inhumanity developed as a result of wars and hatred. Therefore, by using pathos, Wiesel is able to develop the central idea that wars and hatred are not
Examples Of What Will The Legacy Of This Vanishing Century By Elie Wiesel
140 Words | 1 PagesUtilization of the repetition of questions allows Wiesel to make the audience ultimately feel as if they are in control of deciding what they think is morally correct. Within almost every paragraph, Wiesel asks his listeners rhetorical questions which truly have one compassionate answer. By using the questions, Wiesel manages to assist the listener in choosing his side without simply telling them what the right answer is. For example, when Wiesel asks if “the human being [has] become less indifferent and more human,” he implies that indifference in unconditionally inhumane. The question of “what will the legacy of this vanishing century be?” fills the audience with the duty of making the end of the century and the upcoming century the most
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
1362 Words | 6 PagesWiesel subtly influences his audience to feel the agony that he felt during the events of the Holocaust, and the pain that he still feels today over losing so many important people in his life. This is due to his use of pathos throughout the speech, and he addresses that, “No one may speak for the dead, no one may interpret their mutilated dreams and visions.” Wiesel understands that his speech can only honor the individuals who lost their lives in the torturous concentration camps, but he can’t speak on their behalf. He goes on to say that he still feels the presence of the people he lost, “The presence of my parents, that of my little sister.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
552 Words | 3 PagesElie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.
Critical Evaluation Essay: The Perils Of Indifference
855 Words | 4 PagesIn the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of
Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis
609 Words | 3 PagesWhen Wiesel makes it clear that he has suffered personal loss, he is evoking an emotional response from his audience. By stating that he senses their presence “The presence of my parents, that of my little sister.” the audience empathizes with him and the horror of the Holocaust is made more clear for them. They cannot only understand his feelings; they can connect to them which strengthens their understanding of the need to act whenever they witness inhumanity.
Essay On The Perils Of Indifference
1742 Words | 7 PagesHolocaust. Death. Suffering. These are but a few of the words that may begin to describe this tragic period in the history of man. The Perils of Indifference and Night are both publications by the Elie Wiesel, one of the many victims to the Holocaust, but one of the very few victims who lived to tell his story.
More about Summary Of The Perils Of Indifference
'The Perils Of Indifference' By Elie Wiesel
1129 Words | 5 PagesElie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech
556 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
797 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
455 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel
590 Words | 3 PagesPerils Of Indifference
854 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference
848 Words | 4 PagesThe Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
621 Words | 3 PagesPathos In Elie Wiesel's Speech
466 Words | 2 PagesExamples Of What Will The Legacy Of This Vanishing Century By Elie Wiesel
140 Words | 1 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
1362 Words | 6 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
552 Words | 3 PagesCritical Evaluation Essay: The Perils Of Indifference
855 Words | 4 PagesElie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis
609 Words | 3 PagesEssay On The Perils Of Indifference
1742 Words | 7 Pages