In the case of Thomas Jefferson, he and Hamilton had opposing views and both spent a lot of time trying to discredit the other, in the case of John Adams, Hamilton was afraid that he did not share his political views and did not want someone like that as president so he tried to sway the voting so that Adams would be vice president instead (Britannica 15). As previously stated, some conflicts would lead to a duel which is exactly what happened with Hamilton and Aaron
Our history of out country developing was very, very rocky. It took a lot of courageous people with a strong belief in independence and freedom to break away from one of the most powerful countries in America at that time. Strong leaders are elected her fairly and under the direction of a Republic, where people vote for representatives to decide what is best for our country. Throughout our entire history, presidents have done their best to improve our country the best ways they think they can. Despite all of this, and despite the fact I think all of our past presidents we're great, the one I believe was the best was our president, Barack Obama.
In 1797, Jefferson was elected as vice-president of the United States. Throughout his four years as vice-president, he wrote “A Manual of Parliamentary Practice”, one of the most useful documents to legislative prosecutions. In the elections of 1800, the Republican candidate Thomas Jefferson becomes the third president of the United States. During Jefferson’s first term as president, he accomplished many remarkable things and clearly used his power wisely. The Louisiana Purchase, however, was his most significant accomplishment along with the expeditions of Louis and Clark.
When describing a man that served as a continental officer in the Revolutionary War, succeeded in his career as a lawyer, ran for president, commited murder, and formulated a plan to Annex land from the United States Government, the word motivated has to come to mind (Verell). This is the case with revolutionary politician Aaron Burr, who accomplished all these feats and more in the span of his lifetime. Although areas of his career are surrounded in controversy, it is hard to deny that Burr was driven get things accomplished, whether they be legal, moral, or anything in between. It takes a lot of drive motivation to get as much done as Burr did, and he drew this from many sources. The people Aaron Burr interacted with fueled him with motivation, and his hunger to be an important figure in government and history added to his desire to achieve his ideals, which resulted in an impressive list of accomplishments.
Being a highly decorated war hero and former Assistant Secretary to the Navy made Roosevelt a prime choice for a president with military experience. At the start of the Spanish American War, Roosevelt stepped down from his position as a Naval Secretary and became a colonel in the Rough Riders. (“Theodore Roosevelt”). As a citizen, it was reassuring to know that the current president in office was willing to die for his country and be apart of something much bigger for the safety of American citizens. Theodore became well-known for his position and accomplishments as a war hero and was quoted saying, "I would rather have led that charge and earned my colonelcy than served three terms in the United States Senate.
America tends to focus more on solving world crises, like the Middle East dilemma or the age old battle against world hunger. Machiavelli also mentions the two separate ruling systems common throughout many accounts of princes. The notion that princes either rule with a conglomerate of nobles or ministers. He suggests that both nobles and ministers assist the prince in his judgement while the prince resides as a “great pretender” who not only claims to have complete control but also suppresses any suggestive objection towards any decision of government, described in detail in Chapter XVIII. Machiavelli’s notion has a direct correlation to American presidency in the past 100 years, as power has been assumed to be held within the president himself, where in reality the president has little decision making power on his own.
The numerous conventions of today 's political discourse have been specifically crafted in order to appeal to the general public. Some politicians deviate from these conventions in order to stand out. However many political leaders conform to them since it is the most reliable way to create a wide range of support. These carefully developed political norms are present and detectable among numerous speeches done by the most powerful and influential political leaders in the world. Since the public is easily manipulated by these conventions, presidents are usually found to utilize them.
Jacksonian Democracy was a 19th-century political philosophy that gained prevalence through the American populace, becoming the nation’s dominant political view for a generation. Spanning from the beginning of Andrew Jackson’s presidency to approximately the 1940s, it placed a much greater emphasis on the “greater democracy for the common man”. The impacts of this philosophy have extended well beyond the 1940s. Andrew Jackson himself had infused the country with greater democratic ideologies and character, something seen evidently in present-day America. Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the “guardians” of the United States Constitution thought that reasoning is flawed.
Reagan: The Most Influential Some people may think any of the 45 United States Presidents are corrupt politicians, that they are only trying to accomplish reelection or simply making them stand out in history. Although, there is one president who stood out amongst them all, who “was committed to absolute integrity. His trustworthiness was recognized by those he dealt with in Congress, in politics, and foreign leaders throughout the world” (Meese). That man is Ronald Reagan, aka. “The Great Communicator,” who, when listing the top presidents in American history, would be towards the top every time.
This is especially shown when Hamilton assisted George Washington in nearly everything he did, and was his “right hand man”, for lack of a better term. Ronald (Ron) Chernow has many accomplishments other than writing the well known biography of Hamilton. He won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for Biography, won the 2011 American History Book Prize for his 2010 book, Washington: A Life, received the National Book Award for Nonfiction due to the writing of his 1990 book, The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance. Although there are other credentials Chernow has, those are just the most significant ones, as well as Chernow providing inspiration for Miranda’s Hamilton play.