because Lopez wasn't able to defend himself and wasn't able to having a hearing and his family wasn't notified either. If the court did not try to stop this it would have affected him and everyone else as well. If you think about it everyone had the right to be heard and the court bringing up that it affected the 14th amendment was a good way to protect the right to a hearing, because using liberty and property (property being education) challenged the court and made a different viewpoint on how the case was projected. Now we’re able to have court ruling for suspensions. which is a good thing and also sinces i'm a student i think it's fair that court hearing is given because without it how would a student be able to defend themselves without anyone to make the decisions if they are right or wrong.
In the article on NewsEla, “Famous Speech…,” it states "So many signs that the Florida shooter was mentally disturbed" and that he was even expelled for bad behavior.” Also in a NewsEla article called “Issue Overview…,” it says “The week after the shooting, senators proposed half a dozen laws that would keep suspected terrorists from buying guns.” The difference between these two sentences in the different articles is that some people think that the person that decides to cause a school shooting is mentally disturbed. Other people may think that they are terrorist and they believe in the Muslims teachings of ISIS. These are two completely different things because the person that could be mentally disturbed could be just an average, teenage American that goes to school and does everything normal except the fact that he planning to do something that is beyond scary for others.
It was made illegal in the 1930’s for the same reasons as alcohol, because it was believed that it was going to do harm to society. As years have gone by, it is obvious that a mistake was made. The fact that marijuana was made illegal has created numerous problems for the United States that on the long run could have been easily avoided. Countries in different parts of the world and some states within the United States have already legalized marijuana and they have all shown positive outcomes out of their decisions. Although marijuana is illegal in majority of the states, legalizing marijuana for recreational use would bring about social and economical reforms that would help deter crime in the country, increase the amount of money the government makes, and also help people that are medically in need of the drug.
Several say that it is the solution to the big problem the United States has with school shootings. It may not stop the shooter but it could prevent a massacre. Others believe that teachers having guns is too much. They think that the children need more loving and caring adults in their lives, not more guns. People also believe that any kind of automatic or semi-automatic gun should be banned in the United States.
In the 20s, the American government tried to enforce a ban on alcohol, but in the process, caused “the greatest crime wave in the country 's history, causing thousands of deaths from bad alcohol, and creating a general (and persisting) contempt among the citizenry for the laws of the United States.” Gore also uses logos when he writes that in 1969 the government slightly “curtailed” the supply of marijuana, and this led to kids getting hooked on more dangerous drugs like heroin, and overall increasing the number of deaths. He suggests that the government, and the crime organizations, benefits from making drugs illegal. That way, both sides are able to flip a profit. This also appeals to the audience’s opinion— many Americans distrust the government and have negative opinions about it.
”(cia.gov) Also, censorship helps protect people. During WWII, the government censored many different newspapers and news bulletins because they had appeals to the American people from Nazi leaders and Japanese leaders trying to manipulate the American people. The Government would restrict these news sources because they would decrease the American morale and make them want to end the war effort (Blankley). Censorship, in limited forms, is right and necessary
Cardigan believes that WBLAH going by the FC.C. rule that tries to hide the commercials with smoking and other commercials that were
According to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame website ( N/A) in 1975 a car crash on a greek island almot cost Plant his leg and sidelined him for two years. Then in 1977 Plants six year old son died of a viral infection. Due to these recent occurances the group seemed to lose some momentum and only put out two more albums before the ultimate catastrophe occured 2. On September 25th 1980 rock and roll would never be the same, John Bonham had died through inhaling vomit in his sleep.
They do not support immigration, especially illegal aliens. They prompt to deport them back and even wanted to deport U.S citizens that had illegal parents. They also do not support bilingual education. They believe that if students only learn English they will progress faster then speaking another language. They are against abortion and they do not support homosexuals in the military.
This was to prevent thought-crime, which would be punishable by death. “The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-veiw and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. ”(George Orwell). The only way to properly describe the narcissism of the party is to explain everything they had control over. Newspeak is just one out of the many ways the party brainwashed its members into loyalty.
To begin with, the Synar Amendment has been passed in a congress of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is under the supervision from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) in 1992. The law, which was named after its sponsor (Mike Synar), was a contingent prohibition on the sale of tobacco to minors. According to that, minors who are under a certain age determined by each state’s laws cannot purchase cigarettes and other related products legally, otherwise the violators will be harshly
A few years ago in 1807, congress had passed the Embargo Act, an act that forbids foreign trade. Today, a few years from that day in 1807 we look back on the preoccupations that have occurred because of the act. In just one year we saw our U.S exports decline by $84,000,000. We started with $109,000,000 and ended with $25,000,000.Thousands of Americans have turned to smuggling. The Embargo has trigger a serious Economic Depression and not much can save us right now.
After seeing the results of the successful vaccinations, England passed two acts that required the smallpox vaccine. Many people believed that it violated their personal liberty because the government was forcing everyone to be injected with a drug against their permission. In response, two groups formed called the Anti-Vaccination League and the Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League. They planned demonstrations that lead to the development of a commission to study vaccinations. This commission ruled that the vaccine did protect against smallpox, but parents should not be penalized for choosing not to vaccinate their children.
Some readers may feel that this editorial actually is not persuasive because meth is a terrible drug that should be kept illegal and more people would try meth if it becomes legal. But in reality, legalizing meth reveals that the editorial is effective because if we kept the drug illegal that still would not stop a person from desiring and acquiring meth and more people would not try meth because if a person wanted to try meth they would have done it before it became
The first amendment, which protects amongst other things our freedom of speech, is tantamount in “preventing the majority from imposing its views on [the minority]” (481). However, in this famous case the will of the majority, the Boy Scout of America leaders, leading to the exclusion of the minority, James Dale, from based on his openness about his sexual orientation which conflicted with the beliefs of the scouts at the time. Despite the fact that he was free to speak about his orientation with newspapers and whomever he wishes in general, the ideas were seen by the Scouts as an affront on their “morally straight” requirements which is also protected under the first amendment. This raises two integral questions about the nature of our fundamental