ipl-logo

Why Believe St Anselm Analysis

772 Words4 Pages

In “Why Believe” by Saint Anselm, there lies a compelling argument which utilizes a Reductio Ad Absurdum argument to prove his conclusion. Anselm begins his argument with four premises, then states his Reductio Ad Absurdum argument, and finally concludes his whole argument with “God exists.” The argument for the existence of God by Anselm begins with his definition of God which is “a being than which nothing greater can be conceived.” By this definition, Anselm essentially means God is a great entity which no one can imagine. The next premise states the Food understands what the words of the definition of God means. It is the same idea if a person explained the concept of oatmeal to another person, and the other person understood what the definition of oatmeal meant. The third premise states a person can imagine God, or “a being …show more content…

If someone does not understand the words, “a being than which no greater can be conceived,” than does it follow God does not exist for them? This seems to be a hole in the argument for the existence of God since there are plenty of examples of people not understanding. Babies will obviously not understand the meaning of “a being than which no greater can be conceived.” According to Anselm’s argument for the existence of God, this means God does not exist for babies. Another example is if this definition does not translate directly into a certain language such as German, then it follows that a German speaking person would not understand the definition, “a being which no greater can be conceived.” According to Anselm’s argument for the existence of God, this means God does not exist for German speaking people. An argument for the existence of God should prove that “a being than which no greater can be conceived” exists in the understanding and the reality for all beings, and not just a selected group of

Show More
Related

  • What Phrase Does Anselm Use To Designate God

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    What phrase does Anselm use to designate God? Explain why he formulates his designation in this way. Do you think this is an appropriate way to speak of God? The Phrase he used was “God is that than which no greater can be conceived”. There are two reasons as to why Anselm words this the way he does, reason one is the idea that “ no greater can be conceived” he doesn’t want you to be able to think about something greater hence the idea that no greater can be thought of by a person.

    Read More

  • Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God

    453 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anselm aimed to establish God's existence through analysis and logical deduction rather than empirical evidence. Anselm's ontological argument was explained in the following: 1. God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, infinite, eternal, and transcendental. 2.

    Read More

  • Jim Jones Quotes

    1082 Words  | 5 Pages

    Philosophy 224 Monday/Wednesday 10-11:15 WORD COUNT In a small village, deep in the South American jungle of Guyana, two men overlook a massacre of over 900 people. Of these 900 people, about 300 were children. The men stand in silence, but only for a moment, they are philosophers… HUME: “This is truly astonishing… There is no way that Jim Jones could have been a prophet…”

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Anselm's Ontological Argument

    1625 Words  | 7 Pages

    Anselm’s “Ontological Argument” The general idea of the ontological argument is based on the notion that the concept of God as the greatest being implies that God exists—if not, there could be something greater, namely an existent greatest being—but this being would be God. The structure of the Ontological Argument can be outlined as follows (The argument is based on Anselm 's Proslogion 2): 1. We conceive of God as a being than which no greater can be conceived.

    Read More

  • Saint Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Saint Thomas Aquinas argument the second way, Aquinas argues for the existence of God, making use of efficient causes and premises to help us conclude that God exists. In the following words I would argue that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God exists. Aquinas second way is an argument that God is the first cause and he is essential to everything on earth because nothing would have the power to fuel its self without the intermediate cause which is God. An example is a painter using a paintbrush to paint as he moves his hand, paint is applied on the wall but if he stops, the paint would not fly from the brush to the wall, stopping

    Read More

  • Summary Of Divine Hiddenness And Human Reason By J. L Shellenberg

    603 Words  | 3 Pages

    J.L. Schellenberg’s Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason discusses the argument that God does not, in fact, exist. Schellenberg summarizes his beliefs in God’s nonexistence in five key ideas. The main ideas summarized are “If there is a God, he is perfectly loving, If a perfectly loving God exists, reasonable nonbelief does not occur but reasonable nonbelief does occur. Therefore, no perfectly loving God exists. Therefore, there is no God” (Lacy 121).

    Read More

  • Anselm's Argument For The Existence Of God

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    God’s existence is not dependent on anything else because God existed before anybody else did. Humans would not exist if God did not exist. I also agree that a being that exists in the understanding and in reality is greater than just existing in only the understanding or reality because if a being does not exist in both places then it does not seem real. For example, if we did not have the bible and churches it would be hard for a lot of people to believe that God is real because we would only know the stories that has been shared by others that over the years could get misconstrued so, his existence would only be in the understanding, and that is why a being who exists in reality and the understanding is greater. I agree with mostly all of Anselm beliefs except for his belief that you cannot think of “nothing” at any time because you are always thinking of something.

    Read More

  • Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

    1444 Words  | 6 Pages

    There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

    Read More

  • Plato's Views On The Allegory Of The Cave

    1377 Words  | 6 Pages

    Anselm’s argument is based on this known definition of the concept of God alone. Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is based on his foundation of knowledge, logic. Humans have the idea in their minds of infinite perfection. Humans also have the idea of themselves as inferior to this idea as imperfect. For humans to have the idea of infinite perfection, there must be truth in the reason for them having this idea.

    Read More

  • Descartes's Argument On The Existence Of God

    753 Words  | 4 Pages

    If god doesn’t cause my existence, then I am caused by myself, my parents or a lesser cause. There is no infinite regression, so I my existence isn’t caused by my parents or lesser cause, Therefore, God is the cause of my existence (AD 51). As well I am not God, If I created

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

    1797 Words  | 8 Pages

    In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

    Read More

  • Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    2001 p. 180). To fully understand Anselm’s argument, a series of steps needs to be understood. The first step towards understanding Anselm’s argument is that one must first accept the fact that God is the greatest possible being. The second fact or point to note is that God exists in the human mind or understanding. The third point, step, or fact to accept is that if God exists only in the human mind, then God is not the greatest possible being (McGrath & OverDrive, Inc. 2001

    Read More

  • Existence Of God Analysis

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.

    Read More

  • Criticisms Of Anselm's Ontological Argument

    1411 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Archbishop developed this argument to disapprove the fool mentioned in Psalms 14:1 who says that God does not exists. Anselm argues that the position taken by this fool is self-contradictory. In the verse

    Read More

  • Anselm Vs Descartes Ontological Argument

    945 Words  | 4 Pages

    St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

    Read More

More about Why Believe St Anselm Analysis

Open Document