knowledge needs individuals to satisfy some level of infallibilism condition. However, the aspectsinfallibilism and fallibilism are often used in the literature of epistemology. Both terms are rarely defined and because of this, they receive diversified meanings that an individual may find the statements to be contradicting. All epistemologists virtually endorse the aspect of fallibilism. Despite the dramatic variations in the substantive accounts of the epistemologists, they accept that the Gettier
questions. What is a good test? What is a good theory? Can no guess be the final answer? After these questions are answered I will some reactions on it. What is a good test? Popper is an anti-inductivist, but he embraces hypotheticodeductivism and fallibilism. To give you a better understanding of Karl Popper his idea of a good scientific test, I will first describe induction, which Popper thinks