1984 Dialectical Journal Analysis

It starts with a belief that Sierva is not possessed and that took over his life because he knew he had to do something to prove it. In a way a demon inside of him began to control his life. He is not possessed but by demon I mean that a new personality arouse, appeared in him, a new attitude that those who know him become confuse and cannot understand his actions; “The bishop was disturbed that he had not come to read at supper. Delaura realized he was floating on a personal cloud where nothing in this world or the next mattered except the horrific image of Sierva Maria debased by the devil” (118). He has become a new person and that was part of the first step in escaping from his recent life, he is only focused on Sierva Maria.

Their ability to think for themselves is suppressed. They even have tele-screens in every home and store to watch peoples every move. First of all it removes all the privacy of many people and removes their freedom to speak freely. They even have laws that may kill you if you speak, look, or even think of the party poorly. It is a warning that the government may manipulate the whole society in the future.

The reason of this censorship is extremely sinister. In getting rid of these choices, they have secured their position of authority and government, leaving the society lacking the incentive to fight the government. They not only censor their citizens’ knowledge, but alter it as well, and nobody can say otherwise because they have no evidence to back it

It'd kill your mammy” (Walker 1). Here he threatens Celie the victim by telling her he’ll kill her mother. The language Alphonso used had an everlasting effect on Celie it resulted in her becoming passive and not fighting to be treated fairly. Her forced silence is an example of how women are treated in an unjust manner. When Albert/Mr.

Originally, she only accounts for the binary and traditional sex which is between a man and a woman. But she realizes this isn't good enough. She not only wants her definition to include all couples, but she also wants to show how sex changes people and the relationship they are in. It isn't something to be taken lightly, and always alters the relationship no matter what, either bringing people closer together, or pushing them apart. Lastly the final part she wants to

This attraction could be compared to the longing he is experiencing over the loss of his mother that his dreams have awakened. The two begin to meet regularly as a means to defy the society. This will lead to both their doom, the government or “the Party” or “Big Brother” does not allow sex in this society as it produces a powerful emotion in people. The Party wants to Harness that power for its benefit, “the sex impulse was dangerous to the Party, and the Party had turned this impulse to their benefit” (Orwell 133). By forbidding sex, the Party controls any act that was outside their control and they harnessed that desire to support their views (Orwell 132-133).

The common effect for the internal control tools mentioned above is self-censorship. The party members never know when or who might be watching them at any given moment. Neither their neighbours nor even their children can be trusted. So in order to avoid torture, they try by all means to abide to INGSOC

No! Freedom at it’s heart is having absolutely no conditions or expectations over one's thoughts, action, or beliefs/feelings. Oceania may not have written laws but what it does have is a whole lot of conditions and expectations. The Party strives for mind control, to control one’s thoughts, the one thing they can’t do. Winston, feeling hopeless due to the suppression of free thoughts, says, “If you want to keep a secret, you must also hide it from yourself.”(PDF 162, Orwell) The thought police would be on anyone’s tail that they expect had thoughts that they didn’t like.

Also in the early stage of a relationship, when the sex hormones are raging, lust is fueled by idealization and projection--you see what you hope someone will be or need them to be--rather than seeing the real person inside. Many other people face the same issue today. Some blame gender politics, job stress and cultural changes. Others, more cynical, point to the monotony of the love life of our parents and grandparents. But these plausible (and socially acceptable) explanations obscure a more disquieting truth.

Divorces can lead to unhappy people, emotionally scarred children which then puts them at the same risk. It is important to talk about men in this too, when sex isn’t taken seriously men will typically use it to their advantage and sleep around more. This actually affects women more so than men because it directly impacts their self-esteem and can make them feel worthless, which makes them more vulnerable because they’re hurt and looking for solitude. Also, men naturally try to reproduce as much as possible which is why we as a society need to recognize how important intimacy is, to help keep people in place. How does this tie into abortion?

Both are worlds are different in comparison. First of all Jonas’s world, in THE GIVER, In that world has no freedom to choose, no love, or color, the government has more control over their world. But In the book the Giver says that “ he has love for Jonas like he did for Rosemary”(Lowry 96). Imagen a world where you could not love the one you choose. That would be horable.

People in the novella, Anthem aren’t truly free like the Council leads them to believe. They can’t think for themselves, make their own decisions, or express themselves. All their days are planned out for them by the Council. You need to be able to be unique and have your own thoughts to be free. In this society, it is a sin to stand out.