In Jin Ha’s short story “Saboteur”, a man named Mr. Chiu is wrongfully accused of a crime he did not commit and is unreasonably punished. He is imprisoned unjustly and is forced to admit his wrongdoing, but he maintains his innocence and refuses to take part in the police department’s deceit. Eventually the police department’s lies and cruelty drives Mr. Chiu to seek revenge. Ha develops characterization through the use of methods of characterization, character traits, and the significance of the character 's traits to illustrate how the abuse of political power ultimately leads to the deterioration of humanity in a person. Ha utilizes the method of characterization to demonstrate how the abuse of political power leads to insurgence. Mr. Chiu …show more content…
Mr. Chiu is a dynamic character. He changes drastically throughout the course of the story. “ Comrade policeman it is your duty to keep order but you purposely tortured us common citizens. Why violate the law you are suppose to enforce?” (Ha 469) In the commencement of the story Mr.Chiu is a devoted law abiding citizen. He recognizes that the duty of law enforcement is to not only enforce the law for others but it is also to abide by the laws they are there to enforce. Furthermore, He also believes that the police force are harming the citizens by not obeying the law. “He[Mr. Chiu] has trusted that those with authority will operate morally and will honor, even revere, the truth, values he upholds as well.” (general 239) Those in authority are corrupt and Mr.Chiu attempts to use logic and reason with them. He is still a law abiding citizen but his frustration causes him to grow impatient with those in charge. “ Now you can admit you are guilty,” the chief said[...] “We won’t punish you severely provided you write a self-criticism[...] Mr. Chiu cried. “ I won’t write a word because I am innocent.”(Ha 472) Mr. Chiu still believes that his plead of innocence will help him win his freedom. He does not realize that he is not in a place of influence or power to sway their decision. His complaints have no impact on those in charge of him. “If he were able to, he would have razed the entire police station and eliminated all their families.”(Ha 476-477) Mr. Chiu has become a truly changed man. His eyes are now open to how corruption is a driving force in the government. He realizes that he must surrender to the corrupted government. In doing this Mr. Chiu changes from a law abiding citizen who does everything for the common good to a nuisance to society. “In showing Mr. Chiu that his trust in his nation 's law enforcement is misplaced, the chief
Confession might seem imprudent to a suspect who is sure of his own innocence. In many cases, the confessor would mourn in tears for the court and town’s
“Mr. Chiu got to his feet and said out loud, Comrade policeman why did you do this” (Jin 469)? He is extremely angry and upset. The stout policeman acts as if he has no idea of what he did to Mr. and Mrs. Chiu. Mr. Chiu explains to the officer that he threw hot tea on his feet and on his wife. The officer tells Mr. Chiu he is lying and says “You wet your shoes yourself” (Jin 469).
In order to modernize the police force, Warmoth changed three major things. He removed them from being under local control to state control, had the force’s name changed to the Metropolitan Police, and required training policeman to pass literacy and background checks, as well as medical tests before becoming part of the team. The officers received new uniforms, badges, capes and rifles, as well as had the privilege of being educated by northern policemen on how to be successful. New recruits were dismissed if seen slacking on the job, and in order to attract professional men into joining the Metropolitan Police force, a higher income was offered. Surprisingly, these changes helped because the officers took on service roles such as
The chaplain is literally kidnapped by the government to be asked questions. More evidence of the abuse of governmental power can be seen when the chaplain is told to write his own name in his own handwriting. After writing his name down in front of the two men, they accuse him of not writing his name in his own handwriting because a letter, which could have been written by anyone, that has his name signed on it has different handwriting. Even though the two men have proof that the chaplain didn’t write the letter, due to the chaplain having different handwriting than the handwriting in the letter, they choose not to believe it because they have already made up their minds. This handwriting scene highlights the bias that Heller believes is inherent in military court proceedings.
Throughout the course of the year, as a class, we have discussed countless works from a variety of authors, artists, directors and speakers. One overarching theme from these works is the ability that a character can have to redefine social standards and have the courage to break societal norms. In society, it is incredibly hard to take a different stance than your peers and choose an alternative to the ordinary. The contrasting forces between good and evil in the world is the cause for exceptional people who are able to break social norms, however, not always in a positive manner. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, the film Schindler’s List directed by Steven Spielberg, and the short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut,
Sophie Quattlebaum Ms. Gourd Pre-AP 10th ELA March 29, 2018 Innocent Until Proven Guilty Racial profiling is defined as, “the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense.” , that is the very issue that Steve Harmon faces in Walter Myer’s, Monster. In this book, Steve Harmon is accused of a crime he did not commit on the basis of racial profiling. Being an African American youth affects how people treat him and the outcome of this novel.
Inherit the Wind v.s. Scopes Trial “I do hateful things, for which people love me, and lovable things for which they hate me. I am a friend of enemies, the enemy of friends; I am admired for my detestability” page 33. This quote from the book shows the strong personality of Hornbeck in the book. Throughout the book it was made obvious that there are several differences among the defendants, the visiting prosecuting attorney, and the defense attorneys, these characters had very prominent personalities.
The story takes place in New York City, a place where crime is ever present and there is never a lack of action for a police officer. For example, the author states that, “Years ago the Ninth Precinct on the Lower East Side of Manhattan wasn’t the chi-chi hipster place it is now… Shootings, stabbings, and robberies happened constantly and bloodshed was a nightly occurrence” (Osborne 125). This shows that the main character, Steve will face crime and felons constantly without any brakes, making the story immensely more exciting and dramatic. Moreover, this vicious area will throw more challenges and dangerous scenarios at Steve than he would normally have anywhere else, so he will engage in more battles and struggles with criminals. The author’s diction, or use of certain words and phrases, also has a positive impact on the novel.
People fear pain, especially through incarceration, and may do whatever necessary to avoid said pain. The latter concept supports the argument by some that these pleas of guilt are coerced through threats of higher sentencing and pressuring lawyers. However, it still does not deny the fact that each individual must choose to plead guilty. Lying in court for a plea bargain is a risk that an individual takes for a reduced sentence. The system worked for Regina’s truthfulness and not for Erma’s
Mr. Chiu constantly feels that he is the better man. Regardless of him being imprisoned, he continues to act snobbish and arrogant. Proving that unlike most people who would try to at least act in a different manor to gain the respect of the police officers, Mr. Chiu would rather show his true identity. At one point in the story, as he is talking to the police chief he even says “Don’t mistake me for a common citizen who would tremble when you sneeze”. At the end of the story, when Mr. Chiu is released from imprisonment, he is given the opportunity to just forget about it and walk away.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King Jr.). The societal ill of wrongful convictions is a widespread issue in the U.S. and around the world that some say is detrimental to society while others argue that they benefit society. Is it right for numerous innocent people to sit in jail, some on death’s row, for crimes they did not commit because of a jailhouse informant, inadequate defense, misused forensic evidence, false confessions, or eyewitness misidentification (Innocence Project)? These people deserve justice: wrongful convictions are damaging to those who receive them and to all of society. Wrongful convictions cause people to lose their lives, whether they do that by staying in jail
During his employment he has seen not only firsthand but also in news and social media all over how important it is how he handles certain situations. Although police are meant to help, people don’t always see it in that way. I asked for more specific examples and he responded the following. In the Latin community, people are scared of being deported especially now with our new president in office. In many situations their has been times when a crime has been commited, it wont be reported.
The subject of this response is from “Under Suspicion” by Clark Howard. In this story, Howard informs us as to what really goes on when it comes to detectives of the police procedural. In “Under Suspicion”, Howard suggests that detectives are manipulative and selfish in the real world; unlike how other stories might portray them. In this short detective narrative, Clark Howard’s characters are detectives who more often than not seem to take rules and laws into their own control.
This is an important concept because it explains that officers should not follow society and pressure from the public and media but follow the laws that our country. This a good thing to have when dealing with persuasive criminals and individuals. Both officers and civilians benefit from this principle because it protects both parties. Officers also need to know the laws, so they can stay away form trouble and not be deceived by public persuasion. This is a good thing to have in America today, because many criminals will say anything to get out of punishment.
In a not too distant future Britain is filled with torture cells, unfair punishments and prejudice against minorities, although through all this chaos one masked man known only as “V” dares to stand against the government thus being labeled as a terrorist. Little is known about the masked vigilante only that he is an anarchist revolutionary trying to bring down the government and convince the people to rule themselves. In the following essay I will be doing a full analysis on the movie titled “V for Vendetta” Focusing mainly on analyzing the character “V” and also analyzing themes such as Identity, Rebellion, and Anarchism. The motive of the essay is to explain “V’s” ideals and purposes to end the essay with an explanation to why V for Vendetta has been used by libertarians and anarchists to promote their ideals. The movie “V for Vendetta”