Chances are that there will be a negative outcome, whether it’s death or simply the loss of property. Incidents like these and many more suggest that some form of gun laws need to stay in place in order to protect those who feel threatened. The first reason why the Second Amendment should not be abolished is because we, as citizens have the right to defend ourselves. Word for word, the Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Constitute). That means that citizens have the right to own a firearm to defend from the government and/or criminals.
Deadly force is only justified as a last resort. This is especially, if there is significant threat of death or bodily harm to yourself or the people around you. However this is a question of judgment which is left to the interpretation of the person who feels his or her life is danger. Even with that, the use of force given the circumstances the degree of judgment and subsequent use of force should be reasonable. Note that the use of force is not permitted and thus against the law, but it is justified in some instances.
They are put into place to avoid problems that are not necessarily against the law but are not behaviors people should be participating in. Ethical standards for law enforcement officials can include not taking any bribes or money from criminals who want to get out of a situation. This can include not taking money for traffic violations or drug convictions. While this behavior is illegal, it definitely also constitutes as unethical. The biggest reason lies behind the fact that if more police officers exhibit this type of behavior, then it will be more common for criminals to commit these crimes since nobody is being punished for
“While body camera evidence has already played a role in the disciplining of a few officers nationally, advocates are warning that the technology will not be a magic bullet for behavior or resolution of legal disputes.” Meanwhile the body-warn cameras are known for having evidentiary value. They are useful for resolution of citizen complaints and also yield evidence for criminal prosecution. Additionally body cameras are admirable for those who are training to be a police officer, so they could watch how police- citizens encounters. Although on the other hand this body worn camera can also have limitations for legal complications. “Officer Privacy is also an issue with cameras.
It’s illegal for a cop to violate someone's rights; police officers are suppose to be trusted and expected to respect society as a whole. Even though officers can be cruel and unfair, we the people have to obey authority, if a cop says STOP, we stop. Do not make the situation harder for yourself or others, we all have a role to play. The important thing to do is to understand the circumstances and rights we have during arrest. Furthermore, in addition I
Humans needed police because people are inherently dangerous. For whatever reason police were needed to keep order in society. Originally known as peace officers police usually just helped out in the neighborhood and had the job of keeping the peace within society. In the beginning peace officers would walk around and make sure that people were not involving themselves in domestic disputes. Police officers would also do their best to make sure that people weren’t out in the streets being drunken idiots.
It’s safe in all types of reasons. If you really think you really need to keep yourself defended at all times, then you should take the test or some form of test to get privileges to use the gun when needed to. Which will lets us know that you are responsible and have the right to have guns without handing it. Because mostly people who have a weapon usually hides from the police so they don’t get caught. Which in other words, are job is to make police jobs much easier instead of causing them a lot more drama and a lot more work for them trying catch someone that don’t need weapons.
But respectfully, law enforcement’s duty is to protect themselves as well as the citizens. Sometimes, when using a less deadly force, fighting while trying to subdue a suspect may occur and could potentially lead to what some innocent bystanders call police brutality. Depending on the situation, police officers should know when to use force, and if it comes down to excessive force, then they will have to answer for their actions. Police brutality has no set rules or bindings in state policies. In fact, police brutality is wrong and its considered to be misconduct on behalf of the law enforcement
Police brutality must be stopped so that police do not forget who they are serving not themselves, but the public. This means that even the criminals, who are a part of the public, have certain rights, particularly, civil rights. Police brutality causes a major concern in America. These racial prejudices are
It will ensure that such persons are not employed in the profession of law enforcement across the United States. Additionally, the law should specify the reasons beyond conviction, such as an officer not found guilty of a serious crime. For example, if an officer is under criminal conviction or has committed offensives, subsequently, an administrative hearing is the reason for his or her certification to be revoked. The tone of professionalism must be set in law enforcement. Solving this problem is too easy.