ipl-logo

All The Presidents Men By Carl Bernstein And Bob Woodward

1075 Words5 Pages

All the Presidents Men Essay

The novel All the Presidents Men, by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward details the journalistic practices that took place during the investigation of the Watergate scandal. The two reporters followed The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics; a set of guidelines for journalists to reference when making judgement calls. This code of ethics includes seeking the truth and reporting it, minimizing harm, acting independently, and being accountable. By analyzing the text, examples of each guideline being followed can be found. By seeking the truth and reporting it, a reporter can act as a check on the government. The two Washington Post reporters do exactly that. When Bob Woodward is first assigned the …show more content…

The men had broken into the Democratic National Headquarters. As the investigation continues, suspicion of the White House being involved in the robbery grows. For example, as Bernstein is doing research on the men involved in the robbery, he discovers that one of the burglars, James W. McCord was a security coordinator for the committee to reelect the president. The reporters also notice that during a press conference, Nixon says that the White House was not involved, “on this particular occasion”. By following up on suspicions of White House involvement, Woodward and Bernstein are seeking the truth, and making sure that Nixon's administration is kept in line.
In order for the duo to seek the truth and report on it, many interviews were required. In order to be ethical in their pursuit of the truth, the reporters followed the second guideline in the code of ethics. Minimizing Harm. This means treating a source or …show more content…

Throughout the reporting process, sources are being continuously cross checked by Woodard and Bernstein. Every time an article is published, both of the reporters names are published with it. This means that if any information is inaccurate, the writers will be accountable for their actions. H.R. Haldeman, Nixon's chief of Staff, was thought to be the fifth GOP-member to have control over the Committee to reelect the presidents fund. The two reporters had four sources who they believed had implicated Haldeman as a controller of the fund. After the story broke, the attorney of source Hugh Sloan publicly denied that Sloan had ever implicated Haldeman. With each of the sources, there had been some sort of miscommunication that resulted in the error. This mistake was not only embarrassing for the post, but resulted in a credibility issue for the reporters. In order to remain accountable for their work, the Post reporters published a correction to the

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Six Crises By Richard Nixon

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    Richard Nixon the thirty-seventh president of the United States in 1962 published his memoir “Six Crises” narrating his role in six major political stages in his life. Nine years after in May 26, 1971 he sent the “Top secret – eyes only” document to republican lawyer William P. Rogers, who was secretary of state under President Richard M. Nixon and attorney general in the Eisenhower administration. In that “secret document” Richard M. Nixon shares his thoughts about the Mideast conflict between Israel and Egypt. According to his memoirs “Six Crises” it is easy to assume that Richard M. Nixon deeply trusted William P. Rogers, because he accompany and helped Nixon through his main political situations in his career. Mr. Rogers and Mr. Nixon had

    Read More

  • Us Vs Nixon Case Study

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    June 17, 1972 in the case United States vs. Nixon, burglars were arrested in the Watergate building of Washington, DC. The burglars were connected to Richard Nixon’s campaign for president. They were caught wiretapping phones and hacking to steal important documents. Historians didn’t know if Nixon knew about the burglary until he started trying to cover it up. Nixon raised “Hush Money” giving to the burglars to be quiet.

    Read More

  • Comparing Watergate Scandals Of President Richard Nixon And President Donald Trump

    1006 Words  | 5 Pages

    President Richard Nixon and President Donald Trump and their respective administrations have been rocked by scandals and hounded by controversies. While the Watergate Scandal and the Mueller investigation are distinctive from one another, they are parallel in certain aspects. In both administrations, both presidents have been accused of manipulation of their respective 1972 and 2016 elections in order to secure their presidential victories. Moreover, both scandals have reflected poorly on Nixon and Trump and have left blemishes on their legacy as presidents of the United States by generating suspicion and distrust of political processes. One key difference between both scandals is that Nixon has claimed executive privilege, while Trump hasn’t

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast United States Vs Nixon

    826 Words  | 4 Pages

    United States Vs. Nixon Richard Nixon was the United States president from 1969 to 1973. After his first term, Nixon ran for reelection and won by a landslide. How he won this election, though, is what took him to the Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Was Ford Justified In Pardoning Nixon

    628 Words  | 3 Pages

    On June 17, 1972, Democratic Party’s National Committee offices were broken into by Watergate burglars, assumed former President Richard Nixon. The coverup of the scandal made by Nixon resulted to further investigations and assumptions that led to the impeachment of Nixon. Amid to the scandal, Nixon resigned for “the interest of the Nation must always come before any personal considerations “ (PBS). As President, it is their duty and responsibility to make decisions for their citizens and country, those in which are hard to conclude. Although Nixon should be equally treated like any other citizen accused of violating the law, President Ford entirely justified in pardoning Nixon.

    Read More

  • Ender's Discretion: A Short Story

    1647 Words  | 7 Pages

    Fox, CNN, The New York Times, The White House press secretary, The Wall Street Journal, Mouth to Ear, Books, Google, all ways to get you information fast and reliably. But the information they give isn’t always the whole truth. What tidbit of information the media leaves out to what page they are on is all at their own discretion, and all the more intentional. You can only hear what the major sources of information want you to hear, because the media biases their information. A practice often executed today.

    Read More

  • Charles Colson Should Plead Guilty For Ellsberg Trial

    857 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a United States military analyst, released the top-secret Pentagon papers to the public. He is on trial under of the charge of the Espionage Act, theft, and conspiracy. The president, Richard Nixon, in the midst of the media’s attacks, orders Charles Colson, a member of his special administration, to dig up some dirt on Ellsberg to discredit him while he is on trial. Colson hires E. Howard Hunt, a CIA officer, to join the president’s Special Investigations Unit. Hunt’s mission escalates to breaking into Ellsberg’s psychiatrist's office and helping organize a break-in at the DNC at the Watergate in June of 1972.

    Read More

  • Queen Of Versailles Documentary Analysis

    903 Words  | 4 Pages

    When discussing documentary filmmaking, a common argument that arises is one of ethics. Many argue that it can be the ethical responsibility of the filmmaker to make an effort to portray their subject in the most accurate and “true” way possible. These types of ethics become controversial in such documentaries as Lauren Greenfield’s Queen of Versailles, wherein the editing of the film depicts the Siegel family in an accurate yet subsequently negative light. In Queen of Versailles, editing is used to portray the frivolity and unsustainability of the lifestyles of the incredibly rich and powerful.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Richard Nixon's Resignation

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    The men arrested would not speak of who sent them there but they were later traced back to Richard Nixon’s Committee to Re-Elect the President members. Nixon seemed to be in enough trouble, being moderately involved with this scandal, it was then known that the crooks had also been wiretapping the office and stole copies of top secret files. Although even to this day it is unknown if Nixon knew of the break-ins in the Watergate while it happened, it is fact that the President had sent hundreds of thousands of dollars in “hush-money” to the burglars to keep it out of the public eye. Nixon and his affiliates then began attempting to create the CIA to stop any further investigations of the FBI’s on the Watergate scandal (Staff). The former president continuously denied he was involved in the scandal, until the court ordered he handed over recordings that proved he attempted to redirect the fact-finding (“Richard”).

    Read More

  • Nimr's Argument Analysis

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    If I had read only one article I may not be sure if the story was true. Unless it was a trusted source. But if I read articles about the same topic from multiple sources I might have a better idea if this topic is true. In this case I read different articles from the Huffington Post, National Public Radio and RedState , after reading this I could assume that this topic was true due to the reliability of the source and the variety of sources.

    Read More

  • The Movie Newsies Movie Analysis

    1298 Words  | 6 Pages

    In regards to the truth, publishers did not care as long as they were making money, and their papers were selling. For the Newsies, it did not matter either, as when the headlines were more intriguing, they sold more papers as well. This is demonstrated

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Nursing Ethics

    1014 Words  | 5 Pages

    This lends the reader to believe there is a lack of current evidence to support Fowler’s claims, therefore, she loses credibility she might have had (Fowler, 2016, p. S9). Furthermore, when Fowler (2016) utilizes evidence such as “the 1926 “suggested code” it leaves her readers confused as to how Fowler has any relevance (p.S9). None of her readers can view her as credible because she never cites any of the current ethics policy. The lack of up to date information ultimately is a detriment to Fowler’s article, thus leaving her audience

    Read More

  • Why Is Florence Nightingale Important To Nursing

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Nightingale Pledge in a way highlights and reflects on the importance of Florence Nightingale’s contribution and pioneer work in nursing. It is a pledge or promise that outlines a nurse’s commitment to delivering compassionate care. An adaptation of the Hippocratic Oath, it includes statements such as; I will do all in my power to maintain and elevate the standard of my profession, I solemnly pledge to practice my profession faithfully and devote myself to the welfare of those in my care (Triolo, 2009). Many aspects of this pledge remains and are applicable in today’s nursing. Purtilo and Doherty (2011) stressed that it is important to know your professional codes of ethics as it describes our professional morality.

    Read More

  • Edward Snowden Biography Essay

    1978 Words  | 8 Pages

    INTRODUCTION: Edward Snowden, a person who stole very vital information that has unfortunately fallen into a lot of the wrong hands. Regardless if the documentation showed that the American government was acting illegally per the “Fourth Amendment.” “He was born on 21 June 1983, his father Lonnie and mother Elizabeth.” By the early age of “twenty’s, his focus was on computers, he was not only a nerd, he stayed fit, practice kung fu and according to one entry he dated Asian girls.”

    Read More

  • Why Is Confidentiality Important

    811 Words  | 4 Pages

    Confidentiality I will be committed to maintaining the highest degree of confidentiality with all clients. I will make sure to protect all personal information I receive during the course of my services despite my personal opinions. I promise to conduct myself in a professional manner, and not engage in any corruption that involves the release of private client information because gaining the clients trust is important. I understand that if I do breach confidentiality, it could be detrimental to reaching the end goal. I will make sure to communicate any confidentiality policies to my supervisors and managers in order to avoid future issues.

    Read More

More about All The Presidents Men By Carl Bernstein And Bob Woodward

Open Document