In the chapter “Epiphenominalism and Eliminativism", from Objects and Persons, Trenton Merricks present an argument against the existence of baseballs. His argument revolves around a scenario of a baseball hitting the window and causing it to shatter. According to him, the baseball did not cause the window to shatter, its atoms did, because they have the causal powers and the baseball does not (Merricks, p. 61). Merricks uses the Alexander's dictum “to be real is to have causal powers” (p. 65), to make his argument that since the baseball itself has no causal powers, there is no good reason to believe it exists (p. 73). In his paper, Merricks first explains the causal principle; then, he defends each premiss of his argument by responding to …show more content…
According to him, since each of the window striking atoms cause something, these atoms together causes the cumulative effect of shattering the window (p. 62). An objection states that just like the atoms in the baseball are not the same as the baseball itself, the atoms of the scattered window are not the same as window itself. So, what if the atoms of the baseball caused the scattering of the atoms of the window and the baseball itself caused the shattering of the window. This would result in distinct effects and causes, and neither will overdetermine the other (p. 63). Merricks replies to this by saying that in his argument, the "shattering of the window” is the same as “scatterings”, but this objection is considering it as two distinct events (p. 63). However, if we suppose that both of them are distinct, then atoms in the baseball would have multiple effects like multiple scatterings and window's shattering (p. 64). Merricks frames his argument into the following form: “If some objects cause events v1,..., vn and v1,..., vn compose the event V, then those objects cause V.” (p. 65). In other words, if the atoms cause the scatterings and if there is a composite event of window's shattering, then the atoms caused the window shattering swell (p. …show more content…
Pseudo-determination is when an object causing an event is analyzed by its parts causing that event (p. 69). The objection states that the baseball shattering the window is the same as its parts shattering the window (p. 69). To this, Merricks disagrees and states that it is true that when the baseball shatters the window, it participates in the window shattering event. However, the baseball shattering the window (event), is not the same as the atoms shattering the window. (p. 69) An object and an event do not do the same kind of causal work; thus, does not result in overdetermination. (p. 68) On the other hand, the baseball and atoms both are classified under "objects" and do the same kind of causal work; thus, both causing the same thing is a circular argument (p. 69). An object's causing something is completely different from its parts causing something; therefore, overdetermination denied by the third premise is real overdetermination. (p.
Neuromancer Summary Henry Dorsett Case was a highly skilled console cowboy (computer hacker), who was feeling greedy when he was doing a job for his employer and figured he might be able to steal from them. When they caught him, they gave him an old Russian neurotoxin that would make it so he would never be able to hack a computer for anyone ever again (Gibson 5-6). Now, he makes his living as a hustler in Chiba City, Japan. To make life worse for him, his girlfriend stole some RAM he was going to sell to pay his debts to a drug dealer, called Wage.
Hi, Anna I’m really happy that you had a once of a life time chance to go on tour with Rihanna as her makeup artist. But, since you had to drop out of English 1302 I remembered you made me promise to keep you up to date with what we are learning. With never wanting to break a promise, I’m deciding to write to you today to teach you about a new subject we are learning. This subject is about how to analyze an argument and, I going to be using Charles Schwertner editorial called “Tuition Deregulation is Falling Texas Students”. Schwertner published this article in December 7, 2014 on TribTalk.org in order to reach out to students, business man, and the general people of Texas.
In the article Epiphenomenal Qualia, by Frank Jackson, he sets up a thought experiment in which scientist named Mary, who is highly educated in all that there is to know about the brain, is brought up in world that is solely black and white. So let’s imagine that there is a girl named Mary. Mary is an expert on color vision and a world renowned neurologist. However, she grew up in a room that was entirely in black and white, and she never has seen any colors. She learned from many black and white shows and books all there is to know about color vision and all that there is to know about how your eye perceives different colors.
In his article, Searle discusses two statements. The first is that intentionality in humans is caused by features of the brain, so certain processes in the brain are satisfactory for intentionality. The other statement he discusses is that a computer program can never have intentionality. Searle states that ‘strong AI’ demands that any programmed computer displays intentionality similar to human’s.
Fallacies are something to be aware of in our daily lives as hidden agendas may be lying around. Fallacies have to do with the reasoning of the argument that makes it misleading or invalid. If you have strong feelings for an argument, it may be hard to avoid fallacies in your writing. In the essay, “College Is a Waste of Time and Money”, Caroline Bird states reasons of why college is a waste of time and money. Although Bird’s essay may seem like a sound argument, fallacies in her essay distort the argument.
In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer condemns the inactivity of affluent countries in aiding East Bengali refugees. Building on the discussion of famine relief, he moves to argue for his major contention, which is the altering of moral conceptual scheme so that affluent countries become morally obliged to assist needy regions, thereby eliminating inequality (Akintayo, 2013). This essay will first identify major arguments in support of the contention. It then applies the framework of critical thinking to evaluate each argument and culminate in reflecting on the previous analysis.
Twice a day, for a total of 19 months during the 1920s, the American vaudeville performer Edward H Gibson would get up on stage and perform a death-defying routine. The man billed as ‘The Human Pincushion’ would ask a member of the audience to pierce him with 50 or 60 pins that would be inserted up to their heads anywhere on his body, except his abdomen and
Bertrand Russell offers views on motion and change which directly contradict the experience of humans. This discrepancy alone is not enough to discredit his ideas, but makes the argument somewhat of an uphill battle. I aim to somewhat illuminate his stance, however the very obvious issues with it must be addressed. In agreement with Zeno, Russell believes our universe is unchanging, accepting the Paradox of the Arrow as a refutation of a dynamic world.
Simulation Theory Introduction Simulation Theory can explain some of the fundamental questions of life that have plagued humankind ever since we were able to use critical thinking. Simulation Theory has logic to back it up, yet like all “beginning-of-the-universe” theories, it has no concrete evidence to support it. Nick Bostrom, a philosophy professor from Oxford University, is one of the main proponents behind the simulation argument.
The Letter to Menoeceus by Epicurus was designed to serve as a guideline for the particular types of pleasures that people should strive for in order to achieve a happy and prosperous life. In the letter, Epicurus first puts forth the notion that there are particular aspects of life that should be disregarded as holding such a high level of important as they do such things as death and living in accordance with what is right in the eyes of the Gods. Ultimately, the focal point of the letter was Epicurus 's idea regarding pleasure and being able to maximize one 's pleasure was only the true and proper way to live. Especially, now as the phrase "a good life" is thrown around in such as cavalier fashion it seems that perhaps people are being led astray in their quest for happy and meaningful life. Presently, it appears that many people associate the
David Hume, in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, section VII, of the idea of necessary connexion sets out to explain how no impression can give us an understanding of why certain things happen. Necessary connection is bringing together two ideas by a power or force. With cause and effect, the causation cannot be determined. Three arguments are brought forth, the first being of the union of the soul within our body. If we understand how this occurs, we would then understand the cause with the effect.
That explains the broken window, the dirt surrounding the scene, and why the body’s skull was smashed in. I told you she was not pushed!” He rambled on,
Nerve Damage/Paresthesia after Wisdom Tooth Extraction Paresthesia is an abnormal sensation of burning, numbness, tingling, itching or prickling. Paresthesia can likewise be portrayed as a pins-and-needles or skin-creeping sensation. It usually happens in the peripheries, for example, hands, feet, fingers, and toes, however it can happen in other parts of the body. Dental paresthesia is one conceivable postoperative complication of wisdom tooth removal and in some cases receiving a dental injection may also cause paresthesia. It includes a situation where tissues or structures in or around the mouth, lips, tongue, facial skin, mouth lining, and etc.
The Skeptical Argument: Hands and Brains-in-Vats (BIVs) Premise 1 (P1): If I know that I've hands, I know that I'm not a handless brain-in-a-vat. Premise 2 (P2): I don't know that I'm not a handless brain-in-a-vat. Conclusion (C):
The frame, it broke; they pillaged it, stole hope and dust and memories. A baseball pitch, a major hit; the stone smashed every glass. Of bats and mice and spiderwebs, in rooms that hear no more The laughter, song, and Christmas cheer . . .