Andrew Carnegie helped in the expansion of the steel industry. He built Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Steel Company, and then sold it to J.P. Morgan for $480 million. As a result of selling the company, the U.S. Steel Corporation was created. Being that he was very affluent, he donated a great deal of his money to charities. Carnegie also dedicated his time to study philanthropy.
Andrew Carnegie wrote the Gospel of Wealth to advise wealthy people on how to spend their money wisely. Expressing his opinions on ways the rich should spend their money and how they can use it for the betterment of the community in which they live in. In paragraph four, he says, “What were the luxuries have become the necessaries of life.”, this statement meaning
…show more content…
The importance of his vast vocabulary puts an emphasis on his knowledge. Since he was a very wealthy man also, he is very familiar with the subject in which he’s talking about. In the first paragraph, he is referring to the relationship between the rich and poor as a “harmonious relationship.” By describing the relationship as harmonious even though it is not shows what Carnegie imagines it to be. The Gospel of Wealth had a big impact on many different things in history. Charities being established were influenced by The Gospel of Wealth. The idea of wealthy people giving their money to help people came from the article and flourished after it published. Using money for the betterment of society was a main goal in writing The Gospel of Wealth. Andrew Carnegie tells the readers how the relationship between rich and poor has changed over time. In the first paragraph, he says “In former days there was little difference between the dwelling dress, food, and environment of the chief and those of his retainers.” Blaming the separation between rich and poor on civilization. In todays society, the rich live in big houses and the poor live in smaller houses. The rich work in fancier workplaces and the poor work in more common workplaces. Also by saying, in paragraph eight, “ This is not wealth, but only competence which it should be the aim of all to acquire.”, Carnegie is suggesting that people come together
“Everything looks good on the outside, but in the inside it’s not”. “Gilded age critics argued that the concentration of wallet in the bank accounts of the rich robbed workers of just compensation and gave the few to much power. Andrew Carnegie one of the nations leading industrialists and among the richest Americans of the era defended the concentration of wealth” (Document 18-4 Gospel of Wealth). There was an inequality of wealth which the article Carnegie wrote The Gospel of Wealth explained that there is a gap between him and his workers and how Carnegie believes in Social Darwinism, survival of the fittest. Social Darwinism provided justification for the increasing society unequal of wealth being distributed to very few people and the poor weren’t as “fit” as the rich people.
Andrew Carnegie and Samuel Gomper have different takes when it comes to the role that wealthy people should have in society. The two authors have opposed feelings toward the poor people being in the state of condition that they are in. Although their views are different what they are proposing in both documents can help the poor people. Carnegie’s The Gospel of Wealth focus more on what the wealthy people should do with their wealth to benefit the society.
Andrew Carnegie was the one who wrote the Gospel of Wealth and it was a positive idea for the people who are not wealthy. Carnegie says that the upper class has a responsibility to address the issues of the wealth inequality. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie stated that the wealthy class can be a better state than the government or state. Carnegie also states that the wealthy should dispense wealth and it should be a way that does not promote drunkenness. Carnegie argues that there are two types of wealthy people.
Carnegie thinks it is better to build public institutions than give charity to the poor because the poor need to have the “desire to improve” and find help in these public institutions. (Carnegie 30). He believes that rather wealthy “Men who continue hoarding great sums all their lives” can find the proper use for their money, which is to help the community. (Carnegie 29). By just giving money to the poor the wealthy are doing all their work and instead the poor should find the assistance they need to improve their lives.
In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie states, “The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced” (Gospel of Wealth). Carnegie argues that people who hoard their wealth and do not use their wealth to improve society through philanthropy and donations are not contributing to the survival and success of society. This quote directly connects with Spencer’s concept of wealth and survival of the fittest, “If any one foolishly chooses, for the sake of saving a little money, to employ an uneducated empiric [medicine maker] he must take the consequences, be they what they may. He has acted under the guidance of his own free will, and, if he suffers, he has no one to blame but himself …” (The Survival of the Fittest).
The “A Gospel of Wealth” it states the options of a way of disposing wealth. Andrew Carnegie believed that rich people had the chance to help out the poor not by just handing out money but by giving free education, building free libraries and items that are beneficial to improve society in knowledge.(Carnegie 26) Also, poets were able to make certain people into heroes after they have died, no matter what deeds they have done. At the end of Brown’s article, it says, “Gods and heroes are made by poets and balladeers, folk tellers in rhyme or prose.” Brown believed that some heroes were not actual heroes.(Brown
The late nineteenth century was a pivotal moment in American history. During this time, the Industrial Revolution transformed the nation, railroads had dissipated all throughout the country, and economic classes began to form, separating the wealthy from the poor. One of the wealthiest men of this generation was Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant who fled to America to make millions off the railroad, oil and even steel businesses. Carnegie is considered one of the richest men in history, and even with all that wealth he decided to give back to the community. As a matter of fact, Carnegie donated most of his funds to charities, universities and libraries in his last few years.
Andrew Carnegie makes it clear that people in society with wealth should help those who deserve the financial help. If those in need of help put in their effort, then why shouldn’t they be helped by those who don’t need it? In the Life of the Average Coal Miner, the harsh conditions that children faced is revealed. Children would work for hours in a crucial and dangerous environment and be rewarded with very little money that did not equal to the amount of work they put in. It is unfair to those who worked in the conditions in the Life of the Average Coal Miner.
Foremost, "Wealth" written in 1889, by Andrew Carnegie, and “The Life of a Coal Miner” by John McDowell in 1992, both writers have poles apart perspective on social status and on how the economy works; share almost hardly to no comparisons in their philosophy. Carnegie 's views lay on the one base thought that no matter someone’s background they can make success for themselves, while the coal miner essay challenges that by stating “It is an endless routine of dull plodding world from nine years until death—a sort of voluntary life imprisonment. Few escape. Once they begin, they continue to live out their commonplace, low leveled existence, ignoring their daily danger, knowing nothing better.” In the past quote, he explains how the poor are always
Both the “Social Gospel” and “The Gospel of Wealth” believed that there is a problem in society. The main difference between the two books is their completely opposing ideology. The Social Gospel believed it was the rich men who oppressed the poor in society. On the other hand the Gospel of Wealth believed that it was the rich who were the solution to fight poverty because they would ideally give back to the community and help the people in poverty.
The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.
At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).
Heidi De La Paz Professor Kaluzhski English 120 September 7, 2016 In the essay “ Show Me The Money”; Walter Mosley informs his readers about the uneven distribution of wealth in America and the discrimination that the working class has to face everyday. He states that it is wrong to look down on people and place judgment on them because of the amount of education and wealth they might have. Mosley goes on to tell us that we all deserve to live comfortable lives regardless of our social or economic class. In conclusion Mosley states that wealth should not define who we are and that we should all be treated equal that way we can all have equal opportunities to try to make it in this world.
Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.
One of the many Gospel of Wealth advocates was Andrew Carnegie, 1835-1919, who was an industrialist who emigrated from Scotland to American in 1848 (Wall, ANBO). Carnegie’s “Wealth” written in 1889