Argument Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

1187 Words5 Pages

Argument Analysis Essay In Birmingham, Alabama April of 1963, there was an outbreak of protests against segregation by African Americans. This protest were quickly answered by others who were against the concept of desegregation, thus causing a riot in the city. At this moment in time, the south was still segregated and Jim Crow laws were being enforced. A letter by eight white clergymen of various religious denominations, was written to address the situation at hand. Their intended audience being the community at large, but mainly Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who was currently in a Birmingham jail for preaching nonviolence and equal rights. King, a Baptist minister from Atlanta, then formed a rebuttal letter stating his thoughts on the subject …show more content…

They make a claim of value, stating that they support equal rights and a peaceful resolution. The clergymen just want to avoid any act of violence that will disrupt that peace. Laws are already in place that will address their concern, and they believe that equal rights should be decided by the courts and not the people. Thus making a claim of policy. This letter was intended to make a claim of fact to the readers that King was an outside agitator disturbing their progression, and was only going to make matters worse. Kings rebuttal to the white clergy men was stated in, "A Letter From Birmingham Jail."In his response, King wants his audience to believe that justice cannot wait. In his phrase, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere", King declares that he feels connected to and responsible for everyone who is experiencing this unfairness. He believes that speaking out against these wrong doings is the right thing to do. Which is why King makes his claim of fact that he is not an outsider, but is here merely by invitation. An invitation to stand up against his "oppressors" and fight for

Open Document