John Stuart Mill was a person who seemed to get his life straight and that’s a good thing. His Argument in My Mental History, Chapter V, he says that all Mankind wants is happiness. He states that we seek happiness to only make ourselves and others around us happy, but he states that when we go looking for happiness we can’t seem to find it at all. The only time we find it, is when we aren’t looking for it. Since John Stuart has addressed this topic of you finding happiness when you’re not looking for it, I actually think this is true. Most of the time I don’t really care if i’m happy but most of the time when i'm doing something fun or something I absolutely love to do, i'm always happy or being nice to people and not so pessimistic about
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
True happiness can vary for each person though and can be found within each of us. Those who are truly content tend to have positive relationships with others, enjoy the little things, and find meaning in their lives. True happiness is a feeling that comes within us, it's not measured on how much someone or other people’s opinions, but it is a feeling of satisfaction that comes when we are alone the way we live our lives with our values and purpose in life. “Did you hear Beatty? Did you listen to him?
Mill actually believes that people could not survive by only thinking themselves. In other words, people could not become more selfish as much as Kant stated because life force people to give importance to others. Since, they may be succeeding what they desire to do when they help each other on their necessities. Mill defends that people can accomplish individually of aims and closures ought to be considered some portion of their happiness.
John Stuart Mills believes that America & the rest of the world should stop pushing for happiness. John Stuart tells America that more than half who's trying to pursue happiness are usually still on the same road they were on the previous year. In this argument I will show you why John Stuart Mills and I argue about this situation. I agree with John Stuart Mills argument that we should not search for happiness. One example A man named Carlyle was notoriously cranky, but his central insight- that happiness would raise expectations that could never possibly be fulfilled.
Lastly, I believe the last key to happiness if to look at everything in the most possible way. If you look at everything negative then you will never be truly happy and you won’t have very many people who wants to be around a Debby Downer. Being happy is a choice, as Abraham Lincoln said,” Most folks are happy as they make up their mind to be” you have every right to be happy, its just up to you to make it
However, it can be categorized as being content with your place in life with what you are given. First, in order to know happiness, people have to experience countering emotions. “Happiness is being able to ride the wave of every emotion that life throws at you, knowing that you can come out the other side just a little better than what you were before because you have the skills (focus, courage, curiosity), the resources (a positive mindset), and the support structure (a community) to make that happen” stated Penny Locaso, author of “Hacking Happiness. ”Happiness is not just feeling excited and joyful 24/7, it’s more about being confident that everything happens for a reason and knowing that you are strong enough to overcome the bad things that may happen to you. Brock Bastian, a social psychologist at the University of Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, stated, “The danger of feeling that we should avoid our negative experiences is that we respond to them badly when they do arise”...
I believe that pursuing happiness as a goal has detrimental effects. As a society, we tend to believe that we need to be full of joy at all times, but that isn't realistic - life happens. By attempting to be cheery all the time, you will never be genuinely content. You will always be searching for more and won't be satisfied with what you have, creating a permanent cycle of gloom rather than bliss.
Not many achieve happiness in their lifetime. Either they do not live long enough to witness it or they are not prepared for what their happiness is. Happiness is very subjective. Each person’s version of happiness is different. This version of happiness is universal.
Mill further asserts that everything else people desire is part of their happiness, or a means to that end (36). His argument can therefore then be divided into two main sections: the first is spent trying to prove that happiness is the only end desirable for its own sake and the second is concerned with the assertion that nothing else is truly desirable on its own. However, these conclusions are far from irrefutable. In this paper, I argue that Mill does not provide sufficient evidence that happiness is valuable for its own sake due his excessively broad definition of what constitutes happiness and lack of
People these days try looking for happiness but they do not know the more you try looking for it the harder it will be to find. Here it is when you have a special day coming up you can not wait for it. Well when the day comes up it did not go as planed. That is because we over think it if we were just to let the day come and just enjoy then it would be better. I agree with John Mills argument “we should not search for happiness but let happiness come to us.”
I chose to review the fifth chapter of “New Ideas From Dead Economists” titled The Stormy Mind of John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill was born in 1806 in London to two strict parents who began to educate their son at a very young age. Mill’s father was James Mill, a famous historian and economist, who began to teach his son Greek at the age of three. The book reports that “by eight, the boy had read Plato, Xenophon, and Diogenes” and by twelve “Mill exhausted well-stocked libraries, reading Aristotle and Aristophanes and mastering calculus and geometry” (Buchholz 93). The vast amount of knowledge that Mill gained at a young age no doubt assisted him in becoming such a well-recognized philosopher and economist.
Mill’s argument is happiness should not be seen as an individual’s pursuit, but it concerns everyone’s interest (Mill 17). So while a fool may be fulfilled pursuing his own interests and that makes him happy, someone of higher intellect sees he has to pursue happiness for the majority and the greater
Happiness can be viewed from many perspectives. Individuals display their happiness in countless ways, could be having someone to speak to on good and bad times, happy relationships, passing an exam, having your loved ones alive and healthy can be happiness to you the list goes on. It all comes down in the way you view things in life. In my opinion it is about the energy you display or attract. When you give off positive energy into the universe you attract positive energy in return.
Mill takes on the criticism that about happiness stating that human pleasures are better than animalistic pleasures and that when people are made aware of their higher faculties, they do want to accomplish them or don’t want to leave them uncultivated. A high-quality pleasure would be one that people would choose, even one that included discomfort, and would not trade it for a greater amount of another pleasure. A person who experiences higher faculties will often suffer more, but would not choose a lower existence, such as an animalistic one, as they would rather maintain their dignity. He writes, "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.
I agree with John Stuart Mill’s biography because it shows Mill’s ideas and thoughts throughout his life. These thoughts showed his main theory that happiness does not simply come out of nowhere, and you can't simply say that your happy. Rather happiness is achieved through making other people happy. His idea is supported by many other sociologists like Thomas Carlyle, and Darrin McMahon. Mill is driven by the thought that happiness can only be achieved through other human affection or pleasure.