John Stuart Mill Essays

Sort By:
  • Good Essays

    either bring great joy, or cause the least destruction. Two philosophers, Jeremy Bentham, the first philosopher to having thought of this concept, and John Stuart Mill, the philosopher who emphasized certain extent of a pleasure are considered great influences to the concept of Utilitarianism. The purpose of this essay is to consider the extent of John Stuart Mill’s influence on Jeremy Bentham’s theory. Jeremy Bentham’s theory is the generalization

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill starts off his essay by claiming that many believe that the “greatest-happiness Principle holds that actions are right as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (book, pg 1, p 258). This principle is often called the utility/utilitarian concept and it’s the foundation of morals. Stuart argues that more needs to be discussed concerning this theory, in particular what counts as pain and pleasure, and to what extent its left an open question

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    this essay is to show a simple evaluation of john Stuart mill principle “an action is right that it does not cause harm to another person” I will be exercising both evaluations and explaining why the positive side outweighs the negative side of the principle, in a society that it’s people are emancipated to control their own opinions. Mill Stuart in his autobiography of 1873 he narrates liberty as a philosophic chronicle of indivisible accuracy. (Mill (1989.edn).p.189) rather than speaking of rights

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    men such as Jeremy Benthamn and John Stuart Mill, is coined utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a theory about morality stating that an action is right if it promotes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people, as happiness or utility is the only thing in the world that is purely good (Mill 229). It does not matter whose happiness, as utilitarianism is an egalitarian and impartial view meaning that everyone’s happiness is weighed the same (Mill 239). An objection to utilitarianism

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill is a utilitarian. He believes that all sentient creators are psychologically hedonistic; that we naturally seek out pleasures and avoid pains (Pg. 88). As a utilitarian, he focuses on ethical hedonism, the idea that we ought to maximize our happiness. To Mill, the right actions to take are those that promote happiness, the wrong actions to take are those that promote pain (Pg. 90). Mill defines happiness as feeling many kinds of pleasures and only few temporary pains in our lifetime

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill is dubbed, “the most influential English language philosopher of the nineteenth century. He was a naturalist, a utilitarian, and a liberal, whose work explores the consequences of a thoroughgoing empiricist outlook” (Macleod). In this essay, I will be answering these questions: What role should individual liberties as clarified in Mill’s On Liberty play in the good life? In addition, do I agree with Mill that coercive intervention is only permissible in restraining human liberties

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill called Jeremy Bentham’s idea of egoism the “philosophy of swine,” degrading it to something that only a lower species would ever consider partaking in. This original principle that Mill disagreed with was that of the pleasure principle, the evasion of pain and harm in favor of wanting pleasure. This coincides with the harm principle of the same regard; which advocates that anything that harms you or your personal goals is bad, whereas anything that does not harm you is good. Mill

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “greater good”? Utilitarianism, based on utility, states that we should, in fact, act for the greater good of the greater majority, rather than what we consider to be best for ourselves. The ethical theory of Utilitarianism was proposed by John Stuart Mills from a qualitative hedonistic view which states that there is only “one foundational good” (Burnor and Raley). Because Utilitarianism states that there is only one right moral standard, it falls under the view of Objectivism, in which there

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Topic I. Mill offers one very simple principle to determine the legitimacy of state interference: the Harm Principle. This principle is meant to exclude paternalistic interferences, i.e., interferences to prevent harm to self or to others who voluntarily associate with you. What are Mill’s arguments for the Harm Principle and against paternalistic interferences? What is the strongest objection that someone who favors paternalistic interferences might offer against Mill and in favor of such interferences

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism have lots of agreements and applications in society. Jeremy Bentham (1789) was the great man who come out with utilitarianism. He claimed that pain and pressure are two sovereign masters to “point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.”(Bentham, 1907, p.4) Then, a question occurs. What if a person neither do nothing, or produce no pressure and no pain? Is it goodness and happiness for himself or herself? In 1861, John Stuart Mill

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His thoughts of utility would be picked up by Bentham and his account of role sentiment in moral judgment and commitment to moral norms influenced Mill. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are regarded as the Classical Utilitarians who had the desire to judge legal and social laws and see them changed. The society’s problems on the government urged them to further develop and officially call the theory, utilitarianism

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. No, that’s not necessarily true. Utilitarianism requires one to do what produces the largest utility regardless of his motive. (Mill, 1990, p. 175) In this case according to Mill one should focus on the happiness of the few people that he’s dealing with (Mill, p. 175) as he cannot measure the effects of his action on the entire population. However, if one assumes that everyone will experience the exact same amount of pleasure and pain individually; the act of ordering from Thai Kitchen is right

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protect us from ourselves” (Reagan 1). This quote is fitting Edmund Burke. He was all about giving the government all the power, which is why he established an anarchy. John Stuart Mill had a very different opinion. He was very open to people having different views and opinions, as long as everyone was respectful. Burke and Stuart Mill had very different opinions on life which is why I will argue why each passage in my beliefs is the right one, what flaws they have, and which one is the better of the

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways that bring about the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. Happiness is the vital good that all creatures are seeking. This theory is powerfully based on the English philosophical tradition of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill: every action ought to be weighed by the consequences it has. Deontology Deontological theories put the prominence on the character itself, and not on its effects. The right or wrong of an action is the intrinsic spirit of an action. When the

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    action”. In this paper, I argue that Kant’s method for distinguishing “right action” is better than Mill’s view because Mill’s view is based on the consequences of the action, whereas Kant defines “right action” by its motives. English Philosopher, John Stuart Mill, emphasized utilitarianism. The concept is that “the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things in the world and decreasing the amount of bad things” (Nathanson). By following this concept, we understand

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    begin by describing what Mill might do in the Trolley situation. Next, I will contrast what Kant might do in this situation and lastly, I will be also going to give my opinion on this Trolley situation. The John Stuart Mill would probably want me to pull the lever and changes the train route to the right, so I can save five peoples life just by killing one person. Mill thinks happiness is link with morality and the result that can minimize the damage, it’s something that Mill would advise others to

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill is most popularly known for his development of utilitarianism. In short, utilitarianism is the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. In his book about utilitarianism he writes about many things, one of those being liberty and how much should be giving to a society. He discusses if the people should be allowed to voice their own opinion. He describes how they could voice it in many ways. One way was through the government and the other was through their own voice. When

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Stuart Mill was a transitional thinker with a classical utilitarian philosophy. He was a programmatic thinker with a lifelong project to reconstruct the classical utilitarianism. In this collection of On Liberty and Other Essays, Mill is representing his central moral and political concerns for his time. On Liberty is the first essay in the book, followed by other essays such as Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women, and then lastly Considerations on Representative Government. John Stuart

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will agree with Mill and argue that higher pleasures are better than lower pleasures. In Mill’s essay, he defines Utilitarianism: ‘’actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure’’ (Mill, 7). Therefore, Utilitarianism according to Mill considers actions to be right or wrong based on whether or not they make

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    followed back to the times of John Stuart Mill. Paternalism is characterized as the activity of control over an individual and an obstruction with a person 's through and through liberty. Mill respected any outer intercession in singular issues, regardless of the possibility that conferred for the actor 's welfare, as an infringement of individual liberty (a policeman keeping a person from intersection an unsafe scaffold is a well - known illustration utilized by Mill). Mill 's "Harm Principle," denies

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays