“Don’t judge my choices without understanding my reasons”(iliketoquote). Brittany Maynard was a twenty-nine year old teacher who was diagnosed with stage four cancer and only had months to live. Knowing this, she decides to end her life surrounding herself by close friends and family; which she was denied. This made her look for a way to be able to do so, and not be considered suicide. Brittany Maynard was a rebel, because she fought public opinion for the right to choose her death.
Brittany became a rebel the moment her vision was to expand the access to death with dignity to California and other states in the country. Her goal was to give control to all terminally ill patients at the end of their lives, a choice she was denied in her home state. Therefore, she moved to Oregon to take advantage of the Death with Dignity Act. This law gives patients the option to take life-ending medication if their dying process became unbearably painful, so they can pass away gently and peacefully at home in the arms of their love ones. “ My cancer is going to kill me, and it’s a terrible, terrible way to die. So to be able to die with my family with me, to have control of my own mind, which I would stand to lose-to dignity is less terrifying. When I look into both options. I
…show more content…
She made a difference in other people’s lives that are going to the same feelings she was. Her actions opened doors for many people, despite their beliefs. “Supporters of assisted suicide often cite pain as a primary reason why people should have the legal right to die”(Wilson). People with incurable and painful diseases should be able to end their suffering in states where it’s legal to do so. No one else has stake in the decision to die with dignity. With Brittany Maynard 's death, Washington, California, and various states to come will allow people to choose their death date. This will be a reminder of her death to keep helping
For the terminally ill the decision of ending their lives with compassion should be a fundamental right, a personal
After Maynard went through with this act, the recognition for Death with Dignity began to soar but even then only five states allow this act to be done legally which needs to change. The Death with Dignity Act is an extremely beneficial policy that many people don’t know much about but when correctly educated on the matter many people will realize how truly helpful the act really is. The Death with Dignity policy has been around for over 20 years and has dated back and argued about since the early 1990s. It was officially made a law in Oregon in 1994 with 51% in favor and officially went into effect in 1997 (Oregon 's Public Health System).
Public opinion polls showed increased support for physician assisted suicide. This was due in part to technological advances in medicine as well as a greater recognition of patient’s rights.” Twenty-nine-year-old Brittany Maynard, utilized Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, took her own life in November 2014 following a diagnosis of terminal brain cancer. “A Pew poll conducted after Ms. Maynard’s death, revealed that people viewed this as a heroic act. Also, revealed, the majority of Americans, most likely including physicians, now favor legalizing physician-assisted suicide for painful and incurable conditions: 68 percent in favor, 28 percent opposed.
With months of research she came to the conclusion that no treatment could save her life, and the treatments recommended would destroy the time that she had left. She considered hospice in San Francisco, but with palliative care, her body would develop morphine resistant pain and she would suffer personality changes including verbal, cognitive and motor function loss. Considering that she was physically healthy, her body would hold on for a long time and she would suffer for weeks or months in hospice and her family would have to watch that. Brittany didn’t want that for her family. So in her research she found the Death With Dignity Act, and decided that it would be the best option for her.
The argument of autonomy and dying in dignity is given prominence by cases such as Diane Pretty and Debbie Purdy, who both argued that “Suffering, indignity, and the loss of independence are undesirable” (Benatar, 2010, p2) and as a result a mentally cognitive individual suffering from chronic illness or terminal illness should be legally allowed to request assisted dying. This ensures that individuals are able to “arrange to die at a chosen time, in privacy and with dignity” (Benatar, 2010, p3). Diane Pretty suffered from Motor Neuron Disease and was experiencing the disintegration of her body, as a result she appealed to the court to allow her husband to help her end her life, but the request was denied (Doyal, 2001, p1079). Diane’s argument was essentially grounded on the value of autonomy and dignity, the reality of her disease meant she would likely suffer from extreme pain and die an undignified death. The rapid degeneration of her body meant that she would become dependent on those around her for the simplest of tasks.
A strong advocate for the “right to die” movement, Brittany went on the publicly say that she will not tell others how to die but instead said who has the right to tell her to. She is just one of many who had to leave their home state to die with dignity. The details of her journey and her face itself became the public face or the “right-to-die”
“It’s ridiculous that somebody who’s been told that they’re going to die in six months has to drive 600 miles north to die peacefully.” These were the remarks of Dan Diaz, the husband of Brittany Maynard a woman who was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer and had to drive to Oregon to be legally euthanized. Brittany’s tragic story was received with acclaim and disgust due to assisted suicide being such a controversial issue. With the debate of making assisted suicide nationally legal right on a cusp of fruition, writer-reporter for Time Josh Sanburn writes to inform readers on the two different aspects of the debate in his article “The Last Choice”. Mr. Sanburn writes an ample overview on the prospect of legalized assisted suicide in the
This is significant because this supports the fact that this is not an instance of killing to the patient, but by withdrawing the artificial support for the patients, it “allows for the patient’s disease to complete its natural course” (Jansen, 106). In addition, one’s dignity of being worthy of honor or respect can be an important feeling of one’s self. Susan Behuniak portrayed the point involving dignity to the pros of hastening death by mentioning a statement from a patient in the Montana constitutional that depict the terminally ill point of view. This patient had mention that if there comes a point where his suffering is unbearable then there should be an option for him to die peacefully by taking a pill for that purpose (Behuniak). He also mention that it is his life and decision so having “the right and responsibility to make that critical choice” should be available for him (Behuniak).
They may only see it from the patient’s perspective and believe that she should do what is right for her if her quality of life has diminished and she now lives a life with little independence (Alters, 2008). She could decide on passive euthanasia, which is forgoing medical treatment that allows her body to naturally die, or she could utilize a physician to administer, or provide her with a lethal amount of drugs that will enable her to commit suicide (Alters, 2008). Either of these decisions for Joni would require assistance, the willingness of another person to help her end her life since she is unable to use her arms or hands due to her paralysis. Therefore, both of these people place their beliefs in the right-to-die, and then they view the body as destroyed by a disease that they perceive as no longer worth living (Humphrey, 2000).
In order to “die with dignity” Maynard moved from California to Oregon to be able to exercise the right to die. At the time, Maynard’s home state of California, had yet to legalize the right to die. Oregon was one of the first states to legalize death with dignity in 1997. Her controversial devision sparked a conversation regarding: death with dignity, ethics of physicians, and patient rights. In an article published by the Washington Post, Brittany Maynard defied the stereotypical, “wealthy, white, and elderly”.
The Death with Dignity Act, also known as the Right-to-Die Bill, allows terminally-ill adults grant their wishes to hasten their death in some states where it is legalized. These patients that are mentally capable of making their own decisions have the right to voluntarily request and receive a prescription medication to end their suffering sooner. Oregon, Washington, Vermont, and California are the only states that practice the Death with Dignity Act. Oregon voters approved Death with Dignity Act in 1994 and went into effect in 1997. Washington implemented the same act in 2008 followed by Vermont in 2013 which is the first state to pass through legislative process.
Jolene is suffering from cancer after being cancer free for five years. She does not want to be a burden on her family. She addresses to her nurse that she does not want to wait until the cancer kills her. In her state Physician assisted suicide is permitted and if it’s what she wants to do and meets the requisites then she can go ahead with this process. (Harris, 2014)
The Death with Dignity Act has two arguments: those who believe we have the right to choose how and when we die, and those who believe we do not possess that right; that we should not interfere with the natural order of life. Every year, people across America are diagnosed with a terminal illness. For some people there is time: time to hope for a cure, time to fight the disease, time to pray for a miracle. For others however, there is very little or no time. For these patients, their death is rapidly approaching and for the vast majority of them, it will be a slow and agonizing experience.
It’s my time to die when I decide! Thousand of people are suffering without the help of assisted suicide. Less people in the world suffer is assisted suicide was legalized in all states. Assisted suicide is a right that the people of America should be allowed to exercise. Only five out of the fifty states have legalized assisted suicide and even fewer states have tried to legalize it, even other countries have legalized assisted suicide.
With only months to live, and determined to avoid the agonising death the cancer would inflict, she relocated to Oregon to access its death-with-dignity law because aid in dying was not available in her home state of California. She decided to die-with-dignity because she didn’t want her family and friends to see her suffer through the treatments. Because she thought this issue was missed understood by a lot of people, in her final weeks, Brittany raised her voice on behalf of aid in dying, so that others could have access to this end-of-life option everywhere.