Argumentative Essay of The Bann Genetically Modified Products Tremendous increases in the world’s population have led to the shortage of the food supplies. In such situation Genetically Modified products might help to fulfill the needs. According to Bertheau and Davison, “The United States grows 55% of GM crops, followed by Argentina (19%), Brazil (10%), Canada (7%) and China (4%)” (2012, p.4). That shows how GMOs production is spreading throughout the continents. Many people don’t know the difference between organic products and genetically modified products. Organic products are products that undergo the traditional techniques of farming while the Genetically Modified products are products from organisms that have had specific changes in …show more content…
The damage done by GMOs to the environment might result in the death of these living creatures; due to such effects genetically modified crops should be banned. Some people may argue that the technology used in the production of genetically modified crops helped the farmers when the use chemicals such as pesticides and insecticides when they work. In addition, such chemicals also affect the animals present in farms not just the farmers, so the new technology of GMOs helped living creatures to survive in farms. According to Phipps and park, “In the 1970’s the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated that there were globally 500,000-pesticide poisonings/year, resulting in 5,000 deaths” (2002, p.2). This shows clearly the danger of the usage of poisonous pesticides or insecticides that the farming of genetically modified crops helps in avoiding the usage of such chemicals, therefore GMOs are considered to be ecofriendly. On the other hand, I disagree with such thought, because I believe that if pesticides and insecticides are used the way it should be done the poisoning of farmers and animals won’t be an issue. Moreover, I think that the usage of such poisonous chemicals should be used under the supervision of the responsible authority. Most of the poisoning incidents are results of the insufficient knowledge of the danger and the effects of such chemicals or even due to the of safety utensils (Philipps &Park, 2002, p.2). Another study showed that the technology of GMOs didn’t help in the reduction of the amount of pesticides used. As stated by Ho and Sirinathsinghji, “USDA data showed that GM crops increase pesticide use by 50 million pounds from 1996 to 2003 in the United States” (2008, p.4). Another negative effect of GMOs on our environment is that it makes sever damage to the wild life. As mentioned by Ando and
Although things such as the amount of GMO’s (genetically modified organism) in the food is worse today than it was in the turn of the twentieth century, the
In “The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods”, Robin Mather effectively brings awareness to the harmful side effects of genetically modified foods. She shares genetically modified foods are foods with an altered genetic make-up and therefore, is banned in several countries. Also, the pesticides used in genetically modified foods yield harmful side effects to animals and humans. On top of health hazards, the process of labeling these foods are not as costly as the Federal Drug Administration declares. Furthermore, she discredits the FDA’s credibility by revealing the bovine growth hormone (produced in cow’s pituitary glands and is a genetic modification) raises the risk of cancer; although, the FDA approves it.
It’s a popular topic on the media that GMOs are bad for the human body. Well, little did the they know that ninety percent of corn grown in the US is genetically modified (Margie Kelly), and the body can 't even distinguish between GMOs and non-GMOs! There are people debating that GMOs are unhealthy, bad for the economy and even the environment. These people must be uneducated on this topic. Genetically modified crops improve our society because they allow farmers to yield a larger crop, improve the quality their crop, and lessen the negative environmental impacts of their crops.
GMOs increase the use of dangerous chemicals, GMOs are not labeled, and we do not need GMOs to feed everyone. It is time that we stop consuming and producing these harmful crops. Imagine being an organic food, then all of a sudden an evil food scientist injects a needle into you, filled with genes of other organisms. How would you feel? Think about it, why would we trust something that has been around for only 30 years and has not been proven safe when we can trust something that has been around for 1000s of years and has been proven
For years, the health and safety of genetically modified foods have been debated and researched by scientists, but the question still stands: should genetically modified foods be allowed for consumption? The process of genetic modification involves inserting a gene from bacteria or a virus into an organism where it would normally not be found. The purpose is to alter the genetic code in plants and animals to make them more productive or resistant to pests or farming techniques. Genetically modified organisms, more commonly known as GMOs, have been a controversial topic of debate for a number of reasons. The ethics behind genetically modified foods come into question due to an abundance of short and long-term effects from the process, many of which are still unknown today.
What do a tomato, soybean and a french fry have in common? They are all some of the most commonly genetically modified foods sold on the market today. By using the genetic information from one organism, and inserting or modifying it into another organism, scientists can make food crops stay fresher, grow bigger, and have the crops create their own pesticides. Nevertheless, the technology to modify genes has surpassed its practicality. Genetically modified foods need to be removed from everyday agriculture because of the threat they pose to human health, the environment, and the impact on global economy.
We are not only killing ourselves but our planet too. With the creation of these modified foods and pesticides there is an emergence of new super bugs and super weeds which is threatening our crops and foods. Our farmers are having to increase they’re uses of pesticides and could potentially have to create an even stronger pesticide adding to the problem. In a study conducted in Japan it was proven that there is no way to keep the GM plant from cross contaminating our organic farms and plants. If we can’t keep up our crops healthy and clean we are eventually going to kill ourselves off and kill off our whole planet.
The pesticide and herbicides cause contaminate bugs and thing and they will spread all over the city. For example, bees carry pollen and things but if the stuff in the field is contaminated then that will do a bad thing to the city. I could go on and on about Gmos being so bad but on the other hand there is people who believe that Gmos are beneficial to humans! They say it makes food taste better and they say it forms fewer animals health problems. I disagree with all of this because it has been scientifically proven that these are false statements.
Why are genetically modified products harmful? Though genetically modifying crops may increase crop output, there are several health risks that outweigh this positive point. There is currently no requirement by the FDA for GMOs to be labeled. This is a negative, because if you do not want to purchase GMOs, you cannot know for sure what you are purchasing. You must look for foods with a seal stating the food is “Non-GMO Project Verified,” otherwise you may consume genetically modified foods.
Chemical Endangerment Herbicides and pesticides contain toxic chemicals that kill other food producing crops. In the video by Vice: Savior Seeds, a sustainable farmer in Paraguay, South America whose name is unknown, told reporter Isobel Yueng that “the fumigation of herbicides disrupts the growth of many non-GMO crops, and in many cases destroys the entire crop” (12:32). Due to the organic crops being non-resistant to the herbicides, these organic crops eventually wither and parish. This catastrophe causes small scale farmers to lose profit from their unsellable crops.
Jeffrey Smith wrote this blog post using his own negative outlook on GMOs in the wake of the Bt toxin discovery in pregnant women and their unborn fetuses in eastern Quebec. Although his blog post does not directly mention this event, it only further supports Smith’s argument that GMOs should be avoided since this GM insecticide toxin had already showed up in fetal blood and could potentially have an untold impact on future generations. Smith is out to educate consumers about the ongoing health risks associated with consuming GMOs and “quickly reclaim a non-GMO food
This only promotes the use of more herbicide which increases the harm to the environment. There are also problems because GM crops have toxins in them. While they are meant to deter pests, they can end up hurting good insects and birds as well. Besides this, there will ultimately be pests that emerge which will be able to resist the toxins. Rendering that benefit of the GM crop useless.
Since those major corporations run the industry, farmers can sometimes be forced to grow genetically modified soybeans, “little mention there of the 250,000 poor farmers who took their own lives in the Indian cotton belt because they became indebted due to this “frontier technology” not delivering the results that the GMO industry has said it would. It is easy to thus conclude that if there is a ‘disgusting enemy’ it is the profiteering corporate-controlled terminator seed technology of the GMO industry that has resulted in mass suicides and the destruction of traditional farmer-controlled agricultural practices developed over thousands of years” (Todhunter). Thus, the production of GM foods have left farmers in debt, or worst case, cost them their lives. The GM corporations push farmers to utilize the technology, but neglect to tell them how much it actually costs to use it. Farmers have to pay for the seeds, which can not be used again after their harvest, so they have to purchase more GM seeds and any other pesticides that have to be used in order to yield the crops.
Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are widely used in order to produce more food in a shorter period of time. Along side these GMOs are pesticides. Pesticides are used to kill any insect that may try to eat the crop that is being grown for human consumption. Because pesticides are poison, many people try to stay away from consuming them. With the rise of GMOs and pesticides, many people are looking towards a more green option for fruits and vegetables: organic.
As Monsanto is a multinational company whose products are consumed by the food industry, it has to strictly emphasize on its moral obligations concerning the society where their products are being sold. Such moral obligation includes providing best quality of seeds to the consumers and betterment of farmer’s life (Stern, 2011). For this purpose Monsanto ensures high yielding properties of their seeds and it would prevent against insects eating their precious crops. This would ease the farmers in keeping their crops safe and reduce their hassle to sprinkle pesticides for crop safety. On the contrary these genetically modified seeds reported in causing health related issues on consuming the food grown from them.