Imagine a world where World War 2 took two more years, four million more people died, and the U.S. didn’t drop the atomic bomb. All of this would have happened if we didn’t drop the atomic bomb when we did. The U.S. did the right thing by dropping the bomb because if we didn’t drop it more lives would have been lost, we would have ran out of supplies, and finally Japan attacked the U.S. first with zero warning. Many people think the atomic bomb shouldn’t have been dropped but our group thinks it was necessary to do to save our country. - Ben
First, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan because without the bomb, more lives could have been lost from both sides. Document B states, “a few more days would mean more lives lost.” If Japan …show more content…
should have dropped the bomb because Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor without any warning. We did know that Japan was going to attack somewhere in the Pacific, however, we did not know where they were going to attack. Japan had also pretended to be friends with America, so the attack on Pearl Harbor was unexpected. The attack on Pearl Harbor cost thousands of American lives, and hundreds of American ships and planes. President Roosevelt declared that day as “a date which will live in infamy.” This quote shows that the attack on Pearl Harbor was devastating to the United States and to the American naval forces. It was also said in The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt that “No matter how long it may take us . . . the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.” This meant that America would win the war eventually, no matter how long it would take or what it would take. For us to win the war, it meant that we had to drop the atomic bomb on Japan in order to get them to surrender. Therefore, we dropped the atomic bomb on Japan without warning because they attacked us at the beginning of the war with no warning. …show more content…
was right in dropping the bomb is because if we didn’t, then we had the possibility of losing supplies. If we were to fight on the front then we would have to supply our men with weapons, food, and clothing, making it hard to keep supplies in stock for the people back home. Paul Fussell states, “The people who preferred invasion to A-Bombing seemed to have no intention of proceeding to the Japanese front themselves”. This quote shows that people didn’t want to fight on the front so it would be a waste of our supplies that we could use for something else. And one of the most important reasons of why we would’ve run out of supplies is because trade was slow and not many countries wanted to trade so we wouldn’t have sufficient supplies. A quote from the article Stopping Russia says, “Byrnes was concerned about Russia's post war behavior.” This shows that trade would’ve stopped between countries. -
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
(source 2)AKA THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE AGAINST THE DECISION EVEN THOUGH THEY WANTED THE WAR TO END They wanted a quick end to the war and agreed that the use of the atomic bombs would be an effective method but they believed it was unjustified to do so on Japan.(source 2) Unless the details of the attack were made public and Japan was given an opportunity to surrender, the atomic bomb attack would not be justified. (source 2) The sheer possibility of the use of atomic bombs would be enough to keep Japan at bay.(source 2) “The added material strength which this lead gives to the United States brings with it the obligation of restraint and if we were to violate this obligation our moral position would be weakened in the eyes of the world and in our eyes. ”(source
With more and more US lives being lost or will be lost when invading Japan more and more, the US made the reasonable decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan because like what Chamber said to win the war you have to end the other side and, “make it terrible, and the war will
Most people know that the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan during World War Two. But what most people don’t know is why the United States decided to drop weapons of mass destruction on their enemies. America decided to develop and use atomic bombs during World War Two to save both American and Japanese lives, end the war, and to have a defense against Germany. One of the main reasons the United States decided to drop the atomic bombs was to save lives. While it may seem contradictory, by dropping the atomic bomb, the number of lives lost was minimized.
The United States’ order to drop the pair of nuclear bombs was debated until logical conclusions were presented. The decision to finally deploy the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era. America needed to show that they ruled the world stage, and they needed to make Russia more manageable. In addition, the atomic bomb was not required to win the war, displaying that the United States exploited the war as an excuse to show their force and power to other countries on the world stage.
On account of many American lives taken from the surprise attack by the Japanese, the U.S. decided to take its revenge by slowing attacking and making its way to Japan’s Mainland.
It was terrible to send these bombs; it was the deadliest weapon of war. However, it was certainly justified. Could we have said Japan wouldn’t have done the same to the US? We have seen them bomb us where it mattered the most on December 7th, 1941. It is proven in Document 12, a speech from President Truman, that Japan deserved what was coming for them.
In document 5, it states that according to William Shockley, who was a physicist and inventor, there would be up to 800,000 Allied deaths and up to 10,000,000 Japanese deaths. With this information, the United States then decided to drop the bomb. But yet, they had the solution right there in front of
"Yeah, like what? Me and all my buddies jumping in Tokyo, and the Allied forces going in, and all of us getting killed”(Doc 6). People will always question other's decisions when they have no clue what they were thinking at the moment. Nobody wants to have to jump out of an airplane say, and then get shot out of the sky or lit up on a beach, but they have to even though it’s not in THEIR best interest. The Japanese tried to capture Hawaii and which is part of America and got the Americans angry so dropping the bomb would have needed to be done as soon as possible.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
Was it right for the United States to drop the Atomic Bomb? Many people have a different opinion on this subject either they support or oppose it and I for one support it. Those people have their own reasons for how they choose to feel about this topic and they are entitled to have that opinion. If the bombing on Japan never happened who knows what the outcome may have been for all we know the war would have probably continued on.
President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.
Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
I think the United States should have not dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the atomic bombs was too expensive and it was not really worth it, they wiped out two entire cities, and Japan was planning on surrendering. The atomic bomb they used on Nagasaki cost 2 billion