During the mid-nineteenth century, the controversy over the morality of slavery and the rights of African Americans overshadowed America’s efforts of building a united nation. In fact, this controversy tore America apart. Abraham Lincoln was not only one of the leading anti-slavery advocates, but he also eventually became president during this tumultuous era. Many events occurred prior to the start of the Civil War that shaped Lincoln’s thinking and his approach to abolishing slavery. These events include the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott decision of 1857, and Lincoln’s senate race against Stephen A. Douglas. These events shaped Lincoln’s thoughts by leading him to alter his pre-existing views on slavery and black freedom; …show more content…
One of the first major events during Lincoln’s political career was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which was passed through Congress by Stephen A. Douglas. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a bill that gave Kansas and Nebraska the right to decide on their own, by popular vote, whether or not slavery would be instituted in the state. Interestingly, Lincoln’s response to Douglas’ decision was not immediate. He remained silent for a while before delivering many speeches, the longest being the Peoria Speech. In all of his speeches, Lincoln argued that Douglas’ decision did not correlate with the intention of the founding fathers, who wanted the expansion of slavery to be prohibited and hoped that slavery will …show more content…
In addition, this decision revealed that African-Americans were considered to be property rather than citizens. In sum, Dred Scott, a slave of Dr. John Emerson of Illinois, a state in which slavery is prohibited, sued his master’s widow for not granting him his freedom in a free state. The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott was not entitled to his freedom and must remain a slave. Lincoln described the Dred Scott Decision as a “burlesque upon judicial decisions”. Significantly, this decision displays the false interpretation of the Declaration of Independence(DOI) and the clear opposition Congress has to the idea that equality also applied to blacks. Instead of Lincoln simply stating his opinion on the Dred Scott Decision, Foner states that “for the first time, he elaborated on what he meant” by his statement on equality. This is seen in his speech after the Dred Scott Decision when Lincoln states that he is aware that in the time they are in, blacks will never have all the same rights as whites. Of the Declaration of Independence’s authors, Lincoln stated, “they defined with tolerable distinctness, in what respects they did consider all men created equal - equal in ‘certain inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’”. Here, Lincoln makes it clear that he is aware that in the time
In the Dred Scott majority opinion they believed it to be “conclusive” that the Declaration of Independence was not meant to include the “enslaved African race”. They were meant to be “excluded from civilised government and doomed to slavery”. They were under the impression that slaves were property and that they had the right to
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Throughout the ideas of sectionalism within the Northern and Southern states, The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 has caused a division within borders, paved the way for the issue of slavery to increase, and the result of Bleeding Kansas. The issue between the borders had to be resolved, as to the decision of Kansas becoming a free or slave state. President Abraham Lincoln spoke out against the idea, “Lincoln laid out his objections to the Act and resurrected his political career in a brilliant speech at Peoria on October 16, 1854”. (Monroe, R.D.) Lincoln also wondered how it was morally right to treat people based off of popular vote, “Lincoln criticized popular sovereignty, questioning how it was that this doctrine
The decision that was made in the 1857 by the Supreme Court about Dred Scott becoming a freeman was not reasonable or logical. In the 1850s the nation was faced with a conflict over slavery that would threaten to tear the West apart; the free states from the slave states. The main question that Dread Scott argued was whether a slave’s status overrode his previous condition when he entered a free state or territory. Throughout time, slaves had slave owners.
The Lincoln and Douglas Debates in 1858 were a series of important joint discussions that would determine the future of slavery in America. The Lincoln/Douglas Debates were also known as the Great Debates of 1858. Before the debates, Douglas had unusually defied President James Buchanan and the southern democratic leaders about admitting Kansas as a slave state under the Lecompton constitution. Those from the North that were against slavery, later known as Republicans, found interest in having Douglas reelected as a U.S. Senate. Lincoln and his allies had known Douglas for a long time and did not trust him.
Abraham Lincoln was a strong believer in people 's individual freedom no matter the race, and with the start of the civil war he decided to take action. In 1863 Lincoln delivered one of his famous speeches; the Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation Proclamation added to the effects with the civil war because with the speech “the aim of the war changed to include the freeing of slaves in addition to preserving the Union. Although the Proclamation initially freed only the slaves in the rebellious states, by the end of the war the Proclamation had influenced and prepared citizens to advocate and accept abolition for all slaves in both the North and South.” The
Before he fought for the Senate seat in Illinois and before he was elected President of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln was merely a man from Illinois who cultivated a set of beliefs and morals that would guide him and his country through one of the most difficult times in its history. One of the most revered presidents in American history, Lincoln emancipated southern slaves and lead his country through a civil war. It was his responses to the Dred Scott case and Senator Douglas and his debates throughout the 1850’s that helped shape the type of president, he would become. Lincoln recognized the burgeoning divide in American society just prior to the Lincoln-Douglas debates and addressed this disunion in order to garner the attention
On the contrary, Lincoln truly believed that the Continental Congress “intended to include all men, but they did not intend to declare all men equal in all respects.” Although this statement seems contradictory, he goes on to explain that “they meant simply to declare the right, so that the enforcement of it might follow as fast as circumstances should permit.” He intends to demonstrate the idea of the Preamble as a theory that will only become law when the time is right according to society. In essence, Douglas held many accusations against Lincoln over three main concerns: the controversy over slavery, Lincoln’s remarks against the Supreme Court, and both men’s interpretation of the Preamble of the Constitution. Although Douglas tried to incriminate Lincoln by exploiting extracts from his Springfield speech, Lincoln rebutted by explaining the intent of his
Additionally, vital political actions carried out by the federal government during the 1850s, led to more division between abolitionists and proslavery Southerners, as the decisions were more one-sided. Major events leading to this war included the Compromise of 1850, introduced by Henry Clay, who intended to unite the North and South, preventing secession, which John Calhoun strongly encouraged. However, the set of laws passed within Clay’s compromise led to more territorial conflict in the west. Next, the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 was written by Stephen A. Douglas, who wanted to organize the territory of Nebraska. However, the act resulted in the outbreak of extreme fight and bloodshed in the border of Kansas, because of popular sovereignty and the Missouri Compromise being repealed.
Though, there were many contributions to the downfall of the Union during the 1800’s, the major issues were due to lack of communication. The constitution was misinterpreted and left out many key topics. One of the many stressed topics was slavery. The resolution was far worse than they would have imagined, but it was much needed.
Throughout the middle of the 1800s, the unity of the United States was threatened by the possibility of traveling closer to dividing into two separate countries. Disputes between the North and South grew as they disagreed on the allowance of slavery in the United States. The North strongly believed that slavery was immoral and should be abolished, whereas, the economy of the South greatly depended on the work of slaves in the cotton industry. After many years of compromises dealing with popular sovereignty among the states, a few key events led to the inevitable disunion of the United States. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the decision in the Dred Scott case led to disunion because they resulted in disagreements between the North
Abraham Lincoln had a strong hearted desire to end slavery, although, prior to the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 Lincoln was laid back and spoke to the public very balanced. The Kansas-Nebraska Act contradicted the Missouri Compromise’s ban on slavery. It stated that slavery would be voted on individually by each territory. The passing of this act fired
Thus, the decision prevented free blacks from advancing in society. The constitution did not apply to them, which consequently developed a lot of confusion and created problems the future free blacks and slaves in the United States. Last of all, even though free blacks were considered as free men, the court failed to recognize them as citizens. This meant that free blacks still did not receive the rights they deserved. The Dred Scott decision was to define the free black’s status and define what rights they did and did not have, since the constitution did not apply to them.
“Those who deny freedom to others deserve it for themselves.” Before Lincoln was even a president, on 1854 he was a simple lawyer that was giving a speech about the slavery he called it ‘immoral’. The act that gave the way to slavery is the Kansas-Nebraska act, it outlines that the choice of slaves has been left up to each individual state. Lincoln campaigned against the Kansas-Nebraska act, he called out the Democratic party for letting the act pass.
This proclamation is considered a political and historical presidential or executive order issued by Abraham Lincoln in the City of Washington on January 1, 1863. It is not considered a law passed by the Congress but a proclamation written by the president alone based on the war powers given to the President by the Constitution. The moment in which it took place was critical as it was in the middle of one of the greatest wars America has gone through in history, the Civil War.
Abraham Lincoln was viewed by the American people as man who freed negro slaves. In his heart he felt slavery was unethical and morally wrong but there were certain things written in the Constitution that protected slavery. After the Civil War Lincoln was labeled the “Great Emancipator”. Although some may have looked at Lincoln as the “Great Emancipator” his primary focus was to keep all the states in the union while using the Civil War as a tool to end what he felt was morally wrong and end slavery.