Observational Study: Clothes and Genderic Stereotypes
Introduction
“Pink is for girls; blue is for boys.” This sentence is not just a proverb. It is a cultural phenomenon that has been creating genderic stereotypes since the 1940’s (Maglaty, 2011). Clothing options that are available for children not only affect their style, but also the way they express their identity. My research question stems from my interest in the effect of culture and, by extension, clothing options, in the expression of identities especially among children. In this research study, I explore the cues that children’s clothing convey about the perceived identity and expected personality of boys and girls. To answer my research question, I decided to observe children’s
…show more content…
The colors of the clothing were divided into two parts: (1) cold colors and (2) dark colors. The cold colors consisted of blue, grey, green, and white, while the darker colors consisted of mainly black, brown, and dark blue. These colors convey the message that unlike girls (in red and pink) who should be passionate and loving, boys (in blue and black) are not supposed to be in touch with their emotions; instead, they are supposed to be impersonal and neutral. The shapes accompanying the clothes were either sport-related a football, a baseball, or the logos of local sport teams (the Red Sox, the Celtics, and the Patriots). Other shapes included motor vehicles like cars, bikes, and trucks. All these options could be seen as a cue for how boys are expected to be: athletic, strong, and …show more content…
Moreover, a new theme emerged while observing the newborn boys’ section as multiple flirtatious phrases were seen in all three stores; phrases like “the man of your dreams,” “ladies’ man,” and “heartbreaker.” All these phrases
Conclusion
The clothing options I observed at Carter’s, Gymboree, and T. J. MAXX were all clearly reinforcing the same old gender norms in which girls are expected to be happy, cheerful, polite, and calm, while boys are expected to be assertive, loud, and wild. It is important to acknowledge the role that these clothing options play in instilling these gender norms into children in our society. Knowing this, people might pressure clothing companies to create more gender-neutral clothing or options that are more appropriate for this new, knowledgeable generation.
One of the limitation of this study is the fact that all three stores were observed in the same location/city. However, by observing different types of stores (children-specific and department stores), the study still presents insightful data into the general themes of children
Boys are told to not be a girl, that they cannot wear pink, and cannot play with Barbie’s. If a boy acts outside of this stereotype he is considered a homosexual. Stereotypes and traditional roles need to be squashed. Restricting a child to one set of behaviors can psychologically damage them. Maria do Mar Pereira, a sociological researcher, found in a study that “constant effort to manage one’s everyday life in line with gender norms produces significant anxiety, insecurity, stress and low self-esteem for both boys and girls, and both for ‘popular’ young people and those who have lower status in school” (Forcing
I wear skinny jeans and t-shirts on the regular, I enjoy wearing makeup and I love anything with sparkles. But through my adolescent years, I have asked myself, why do I wear what all the other girls wear? I slowly began to understand why: my cultural identity is influenced by my group of friends at school, what I see in the magazines I read and the celebrities
Thus, Society tells young girls that being pretty, wearing pink, and glitter are what girls like may have led to the explosion of the girlie-girl culture. Furthermore, to young children being confused for the opposite sex may seem like the end of the world so these young girls continually participate in the girlie-girl culture, not knowing that their participation can shape their subconscious associations between some of the features of the culture and their femininity. Conclusively, Cinderella Ate My Daughter contributes insights on gender roles and the negative effects that the subconscious associations between certain behaviors and their gender can have on a child. However, I believe that this book offers the idea that external influences like the girlie-girl culture are powerful and currently overwhelming, but a child’s gender role is socially determined and a child’s gender does not, and should not, automatically
They know they 're breaking school rules, but they hope their gender-defying outfits will spark change.” (Sorto, 1). The boys felt that putting on dresses and showing that nothing was wrong with it was the right remark in their situation, they took the risk of getting in trouble for not following the school law. Each person had a different way of expressing their feelings towards the rules and determining right from
Boys, well, boys will be boys. They have the expectation of being touch, loud, get into mischief, be dirty, play with trucks, and remember… BOYS DON’T CRY! These expectations are a few of many, but they paint a picture of what is mean to be masculine.
Growing up male children would receive more blocks, trucks, and action figures. In contrast younger females are bought dolls and playhouses. This in result molds their future social identity in the aspect of gender for the future. These implemented gender roles also assist the influence of fashion choices.
Nguyen and Brown explain the importance of clothing for identity, “Clothing and other forms of style are also reported to signify ethnic and cultural identity and used to differentiate among types of
Gender roles and stereotypes have been implemented in society since the beginning of time due to the male’s belief of being the superior gender. These stereotypes are placed into the children of society's by watching parents or even the parents enforcing these stereotypes through things like television and items children play with every day like toys. Many of these stereotypes are enforced on children through the parents beginning at birth with the basic clothing colors of either pink or blue. Dr. Susan Witt had found one study that stated, “Parents have differential expectations of sons and daughters as early as 24 hours after birth” (Witt).
According to role theory, clothing may influence the self-concept and make the role easier to play, possibly determining whether or not a particular role is to be played at all” (Draa 25). Uniforms are a way for students to internalize and accept their role as a student. Admittedly, another problem is that uniforms force gender nonconforming students into the gender
From the very beginning of our lives, a majority of us are told or taught upon by cues on how to act according to our gender. Saying that if one wants to perform gender right, than girls should act a certain way, while boys act another. In,“Night to His Day,” Judith Lorber discuses how the formation of gender begins, “For the individual, gender construction starts with the assignment to a sex category on the basis of what the genitalia look like at birth” (Lober 1994:55). Solely based off the genitalia, it will be determined if the child is a boy or a girl; from their parents will dress their child in a certain way to make that gender prevalent to an outsider.
We intend with this research to show insight on how to some extent a large majority of students in college populations, within the realm of fashion, tend to conform to a prototypical style over time. Indeed, we tend
In our society exists another social norm, a code called, “Behavior Code”. Even at this moment, many idiosyncratic babies with different characteristics are born around the world. In their adolescence, however, many boys and girls question themselves whether their behaviors are in accordance with the behavior code. For instance, some girls grow into tomboys — “girls start wearing stylish clothes and watching from the sidelines as the boys acted and spoke” (Pipher, p1). But, unfortunately, at some points of their adolescence, those idiosyncratic girls lose thier authenticity and become a part of the society, behaving correspondingly to the behavior code.
Growing up around social media and movies that contrast stereotypes frequently, it has become almost natural to presume a way about a group or individual without knowing one’s identity. Before interacting with those who attended a private school, my mind was entrenched to the assurance that those students were wealthy, preppy, and superior who wore the same uniform everyday, resembling everyone else. From kindergarten till seventh grade, I attend a small charter school called Sherman Thomas where uniforms were enforced. Being mistaken as a private school majority of the time, outsiders viewed me differently. Mrs. Napier, the principle felt as if all students wore the same attire, no judgement towards the less fortunate would take place.
“Fashion (is) a key resource through which individuals … construct their identities and position themselves in relation to others”. Bennett, A. (2005). Culture and Everyday Life. London: Sage. p. 115.
For example sensitivity, dependence and expression of emotions are considered feminine in nature. The men on the other hand are expected to exhibit traits such are bravery, independence, assertiveness and none of those traits that are associated with the women. However these cultures that build perceptions continue to fade with each passing day. The violation of these gender role stereotypes are accompanied by consequences largely due to the perceptions held by the