Compare And Contrast Elizabeth I And Patrick Henry's Speech

440 Words2 Pages

“Queen Elizabeth I's Speech to the Troops at Tilbury, 1588”, and “Patrick Henry's Speech to the Virginia Convention, March 23, 1775”, are two powerful speeches delivered at different times in history, but both speeches share similarities and differences in their use of rhetorical appeals. One similarity between the two speeches would be that both of them use pathos, which is an appeal to the emotions of the audience. Queen Elizabeth I used pathos by showing the importance of the English soldiers in the face of Spanish invasion. She appealed to their sense of nationalism and loyalty, which inspired the troops to fight. Patrick Henry also used pathos by talking about some of the dangers that faced the colonies. He intrigued the audience's emotions …show more content…

Queen Elizabeth I, in her speech, appealed to her status as a queen and her love for her subjects. She talked about how she was willing to die for them, which increased her reliability and made her soldiers trust her. Similarly, Patrick Henry appealed to his position as a politician and lawyer. He used his status to convince his audience that war would help solve their problems. However, there are also differences between the two speeches. One of the main differences is the use of logos, which is an appeal to logic and reason. Queen Elizabeth I did not use as much logos in her speech; instead, she used the emotional appeals of pathos and ethos. Patrick Henry's speech relied heavily on logos. He gave logical arguments that supported his why he thought war was the best option. One major difference between the two speeches is the audience. Queen Elizabeth I's audience was made up of soldiers who were going to war, but Patrick’s audience was a group of politicians and community leaders. Therefore, the tone of the speeches are different. Queen Elizabeth I's speech was more formal, while Patrick Henry's speech was more

Open Document