Is Gerrymandering a Controversial Topic? Gerrymandering is a process where the ruling political party uses the map of their state to draw lines that create voting districts in favor of their party. The result of this is that it doesn’t reflect the voters political views. For about 200 years the government has used gerrymandering during political elections and it continues to be used today (King, Elizabeth) . But recently gerrymandering has become more controversial because people feel that it has taken away their rights as a voter and it swings the votes to one side by a big percentage.
Okay, so instead of just leaving this picture up here, maybe I 'll just go ahead and explain why voting for a third party in a presidential election is a vote against your own interest. 1. Ultimately, the point of voting is to choose an electable candidate who most closely conforms to your personal views, the key word being "electable." If we take a candidate being effectively unelectable as being no different consequentially (See 2) than one who is fundamentally unelectable (read: someone who doesn 't qualify for the position by virtue of not being an American citizen, or not being of sufficient age, etc. ), then voting for a third party would appear to be contrary to the idea of voting in some sense.
The general election occurs in early November where the population votes, known as the popular vote, for who they would like to be president. However, the popular vote is not used to determine the next president of the United States. The votes from the Electoral College are used to determine the winner of the election. Political parties select who will serve as electors, then the electors will meet and Congress will count the votes for President and Vice President. In order to win presidency a nominee must gain 270 electoral votes, over half of the 538 electoral votes.
Angry, articulate, well-informed, opinionated people in a weak political position tend to do that. Elections matter, especially local ones where it is possible to have some access to the decision makers and their decisions. But on a larger scale, it’s all about the money, which buys name recognition, which determines popularity, which is what elections are about. Values, ideas, interests even (except as determined by money), come a distant second, third, etc. If the Democratic Party signs an iron-clad contract to change electoral law to provide for Instant Runoff / Preference Voting elections with proportional representation in local, state and national legislatures, the Greens and other Third Party, plus Independent voters might agree to vote for
This implies that a President can voluntarily resign or be pressured to resign by the Governor General, Prime Minister and Governors, triggering another election so that the people can choose a new President. ROLES & POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT The Head of State would, in this model, perform the ceremonial duties of a national representative. Because the Governor General’s position is retained in this model, those roles and powers would not transfer to the Head of State. Instead, the Head of State would only have 1 other power, which is codified, the ability to “appoint and dismiss State Governors at the behest of the Prime Minister”
Some argue that by focusing on group affiliation judicial selection, a more qualified candidate would be passed over. First, individual merit has never been the sole focus of judicial selection. Judges are often picked by presidents based on if they seemingly lean to the right or left in decisions. Furthermore, descriptive representation actually ensures that the people who are chosen for the job are the most qualified by focusing on their merits instead of ideology or political stances. To make sure no one could say the justice got a job they did not earn or deserve, only those who are highly capable and qualified for the job could actually be selected.
One of the main disadvantages for third parties candidates is the federal campaign finance laws which are rules that dictate who can enter presidential debates. Another disadvantage is that they are usually not allowed on ballots due to the lack of popular support of media attention and signatures to warrant a place under local
The decision made through a democratic process by majority is often regarded as an eclectic decision which aims at making compromise between two extreme political parties. In Confucianism, Doctrine of Mean in terms of decision making means putting effort to make eclectic decisions between two extremely opposite claims after discussion and consultation. The decision made though democratic process by majority is usually not extreme but relatively eclectic (Xu, 2006). Government, certainly cannot become dominant and ignore public sentiments under this principle. This principle could even complement the drawback of Western democratic elections which might select a ruler without enough motivation and competence to make a decision that can take both majorities and minorities into
The Electoral College establishes a group of electors who pledge to vote for the candidate of a specific political party. However, since this method of election is not completely reliant on the popular vote, it is possible for a candidate to become a minority president: a president who only received a majority of electoral votes (and not of the popular vote). Thus, the question arises whether the Electoral College is an appropriate method of selecting a president. After further analysis, it becomes clear that the Electoral College is not a proper mechanism for electing the president.
First of all, I want to start off by saying that we don’t actually vote for the candidates themselves, but for electors who cast their ballots on our behalf into the electoral college . To vote in the United States you have to be at least 18 years old, a U.S citizen and be registered to vote. Voting is typically a problem in the U.S because so few actually vote. Voting can be affected by many factors, including: Education, Ethnicity, Age and Wealth . People who are less educated and poor aren’t as likely to show up versus those who are educated and adequately wealthy.