Many people ask are people evil or are people behaviors evil? I believe that it could go both ways that people are evil, and their behaviors are evil. In the beginning of the book Meursault 's mother died, Meursault took off of work to go his mother 's funeral. While Meursault was sitting there by his mother 's coffin a guest offered some coffee to Meursault, Meursault agreed and said “ I Like milk in my coffee, so I said yes...”, “he came back and I drank the coffee. Than I felt like having a smoke... I thought about it; it didn 't matter. I offered the caretaker a cigarette, and we smoked.” (pg.8). This right shows that Meursault showed an act of evil, because he was drinking coffee, and smoking a cigarette right beside his dead mother, that is disrespectful, and he showed no sign of remorse. …show more content…
Later on in the book after Meursault 's mother has been dead, Meursault was not having a good day the sun was draining him from energy, he wasn 't feeling good when Meursault saw the Arab. The Arab pulled out a knife on Meursault, the sun blinnded Meursault from the reflection off of the Arabs knifes. Meursault pullrd out his gun and shot the Arab, “Then I fired four more times at the motionless body...” (pg.59) Meursault shows an act of evilness here because when Meursault shot the Arab he killed him on the first shot, but Meursault shot the Arab four more times and that was evil because there was no need to shoot the Arab that many more times because he the Arab was dead after the
He lives much like how wild animals live , doing only what is necessary to survive and nothing more. He has no purpose in life and no meaning, he simply lives in the present. He only interacts with people when it benefits him or because he feels like it, as seen with how he treats Raymond, Salamano and Marie. Meursault is a socially awkward anti-hero. Meursault kills an Arab man in the
Through the use of diction, Meursault perceives life is meaningless, which leads him to have the absence of strong bonding with acquaintance around him. He indicates that he lacks empathy from personal and social level. Meursault is a simple man who lives his life in a stickler type and changes annoy him. As the novel introduces Meursault mother being dead, he shows lack of concern and a burden to visit his mother for the last time. “Maman died today...
In the novel, a majority of Meursault 's actions are based upon his attitude that his presence ultimately does not “matter”. “‘But,’ I reminded myself, ‘it’s common knowledge that life isn’t worth living, anyhow.’ And, on a wide view, I could see that it makes little difference whether one dies at the age of thirty or threescore and ten—since, in either case, other men and women will continue living, the world will go on as before,” (Camus 70-71). The aforestated quote captures the quintessence of Meursault’s character and illustrates the reason for his disinterest with the injustices around him. With purely factual considerations, it is true that each human life is proportionally negligible.
The Motivation Behind Evil Throughout history, the concept of evil has been questioned and challenged by many. Philosophers, authors, and psychologists have tried to determine what evil is through literature and experiences. In British literature, stories such as Beowulf, The Canterbury Tales, and Macbeth attempt to show the human concept of evil. These stories provide characters and circumstances to describe the motivations behind performing evil acts.
When assigned this exercise I thought to myself, "oh no, time to read something I will not be able to understand. " This was nothing like that to my surprise. The point brought up by Aquinas really made me think deeper about the meaning of evil and question how it could possibly be. Throughout this journal I am going to point out the topics and arguments made in the reading, give my opinion, and hopefully educate on where evil might come from. A question that is hard to answer is that what is evil exactly, and then how does it even still exist with our wholly good God?
(59) After long passages describing the painful violence of the sun, Camus’s transition into the murder is shockingly abrupt, provoking a sense of bewilderment at the unexpected randomness of the murder, conveying effectively the irrationality of Meursault’s murder of the man. However, during the trial, when Meursault reveals that he murdered the Arab only because of the sun, refusing to allow others impose their logical but false interpretations upon his life, “people laughed” (103) and even his own “lawyer threw up his hand” (103) as they are unable comprehend and accept such an irrational motivation. To protect themselves from this harsh reality of the universe, they can only fabricate and impose their own logical explanation for Meursault’s behavior. The prosecutor, for instance, is convinced Meursault murdered the man in cold blood, certain in the narrative he has constructed out of events completely unrelated to the murder, from Meursault’s “ignorance when asked Maman’s age” (99) to his association with a man of “doubtful morality” (99). In both cases, Meursault’s indifference for societal standards of morality has painted him as a man immoral and cold-hearted enough to premeditate the murder.
Good and evil is a subject that has been debated countless times by people who are philosophers to movie critics. It’s easy to think about when talking about the extremes: a murderer is evil, a saint is good, but what is a normal person? In reality, good and evil is extremely hard to determine. People commit small acts of good and evil daily but there are no numerical values to help us determine how evil or good that makes them. Authors like William Golding and Kahlil Gibran allow us to grasp a better understanding of human nature through their works.
So even though Meursault is alienated from the understanding of the desires of “Other”, his life is still bound to the desires of society for which he will be judged by in his trial (Chaitin). In fact, Meursault’s biggest conviction in his trial is for not crying at his own mother’s funeral.
Question: Why does Meursault never ask “why”? How might his language and perspective suggest how the reader should interpret the text? Answer: Meursault never asks why because he accepts is genuinely indifferent to all events around him, and views life as meaningless. For example, “But everyone knows life isn’t worth living.
Evil is a simple word that we learn at a young age and that we understand is bad. However, our youth and innocence prevents us from knowing the weight the word holds. As our understanding of evil develops, we begin to see evil all around us. Although we hold common societal definitions of evil, each person is bound to view evil slightly different from others. Someone might consider alcoholism evil, while others consider it normal: someone might believe racism is evil, while others believe it is natural.
Hinduism is a complex variety of mixed religions. The explanation of evil in the Hindu faith have three major perspectives: the Vedas, Upanishads, and the Epics and Puranas. In the hymns of Varuna, evil is explained as humans not fulfilling their laws or not performing a ritual properly. Those who commit these evil deeds must repent before Varuna. The Upanishads explain karma as the explanation for evil in the world.
I ate at the restaurant”(3). Most people would explain exciting things about their day and exaggerate, but not Meursault. Meursault tells the truth and only the exact truth. Meursault also has a hard time fitting into society because he thinks everything is useless and “everybody is the same”(41). Unlike most people who put meaning on useless stuff.
Meursault is a stranger in his own society on how he feels about the world. He lacks emotions that normal humans have like depression, or joy. When his mother had died, he lacked sympathy for her passing as her son. This shows how little he acknowledge emotions that usually occur in a passing of family or friends.
The justification is minimal, as the person he killed was loosely relevant to him, and at the moment before the bullet leaves the gun, Meursault remarks that “The scorching blade slashed at my eyelashes and stabbed at my stinging eyes... the trigger gave…”(59). Meursault then fires four more bullets into the body of the man, for no discernable reason. After he is arrested, he is meeting with his attorney, who asks him if he would say that a potential reason for this killing is because he originally repressed the feelings he felt when Maman died. Meursault’s terse response of “No, because it’s not true” (65), is not enough for the lawyer, rendering him disgusted and angry.
What is evil? Evil is defined as being profoundly moral or wicked. I strongly believe that someone is not born evil person becomes evil due to the social background and upbringing. It is an important issue because defective moral hardwiring could potentially be used as a defence in court and this could usually affect the outcomes of critical court cases. For those of you that don’t know, defective moral hardwiring is an argument or defence that people shouldn’t be charged with crimes of the parents for criminals, because they have inherited genes.