ipl-logo

Framers Vs Constitution

1618 Words7 Pages

As time has progressed, the United States has continuously changed to meet the needs of its people. With each passing day, the country has slowly shifted away from what it had been initially as created by our forefathers. One reason for this transformation has been the nation’s judicial branch which has influenced the course of social and reform movements, as well as our ideologies and beliefs. The court rulings under Earl Warren are evidence that the judicial branch is a powerful force that can be a catalyst for change.
The framers of the United States Constitution did not have any specific predictions for what the future would hold. It is also impossible for framers to cover every possible situation that could happen in the Constitution. …show more content…

This gives court the power to void any laws that they think violates the Constitution. In 1803, the Supreme Court case Marbury vs. Madison created the power for the judicial branch to interpret the Constitution and apply it to the actions of the executive and legislative branch. This is arguably one of the first major Supreme Court cases that helped emphasize the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall gave the opinion of the court and wrote that, “the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument” (Marshall). Having judicial review has allowed the court to become a powerful force of change because it makes it possible for the judicial branch to have an influence on government actions that could potentially harm citizens. Through the establishment of judicial review, the judicial branch has been an active role within the federal …show more content…

Compared to other nations’ constitutions, the United States’ constitution is very brief. Therefore, it is the people’s job to interpret the meaning of the Constitution. There are mainly two kinds of constitutional interpretation. The first type is known as the originalist approach. This type of approach leads to a strict and literal interpretation of the Constitution. Having an originalist approach removes flexibility because the interpretation is derived from the framer’s intent. Originalism also “better respects the notion of the Constitution as a binding contract,” instead of being a ‘living document’ (Linder). Applying an originalist approach when making court decisions can potentially limit the power of the court and its ability to bring change to the

Show More
Related

Us Constitution Outdated

1367 Words | 6 Pages

The constitution of the United States is an insightful and revolutionary idea of how a government should be practiced in order to prevent a greedy, corrupt form of government from establishing and taking over its people. The US government is founded on the principle that it works for its people, meaning that whatever is legislated is meant only for the benefit of the American people. However, the Constitution is at this point flawed due to the fact that many of its proclamations are vague and outdated, and has to be left to interpretation as to what the framers truly intended of it. This is dangerous because it further divides the nation when Americans believe in different forms of what is constitutionally righteous, and this may start a civil

Read More

How Did Marshall Use Marbury V Madison As Epochal

756 Words | 4 Pages

The idea the the Supreme court alone had the last word on the question of constitutionality. In this landmark case, Marshall inserted the keystone into the arch that supported the tremendous power of the Supreme Court in American life.” This textual evidence shows that John Marshall from the previous paragraph that he pushed the authority of the court which lead to now the promotion of judicial review. The judicial review was the idea that the Supreme Court had the last response on the questioning of constitutionality. The judicial review was a long term ramification because it is still used still today to review the a law that is brought before it through a

Read More

Summary Of Marbury Vs Monroe Case

940 Words | 4 Pages

This case established judicial review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Judicial review allows federal judiciary to review laws that have been passed by Congress and the president. This also gives the federal judiciary the power to overturn laws that violate the Constitution. In the last days of his presidency, John Adams, had nominated forty-two

Read More

How Did John Marshall Impact On American History

646 Words | 3 Pages

He expanded the power of the Supreme Court by declaring that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that the Supreme Court Justices were the final deciders. In the Marbury vs. Madison case, Marshall wrote "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” John Marshall was clearly in favor of judicial power, and believed that the Supreme Court should have the final say in cases involving an interpretation of the Constitution. While establishing this, he kept the separation of powers in mind, as he wanted equal representation among the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches. In the Marbury vs. Madison, John Marshall declared that the Judicial Branch could not force Madison to deliver the commission.

Read More

The Constitution's Two Stage Amendment Process

61 Words | 1 Pages

The importance of the Supreme Court increases as the Constitution considers proposing

Read More

Compare And Contrast Edwin Meese And William Brennan

774 Words | 4 Pages

Both of them spoke about the intent of the framers of the Constitution and the way in which we should use their original theories. During his Speech to the Federalist Lawyer Society, Meese, a former Attorney General of the United States, argued for “originalism” which means that judges should seek and apply the founder’s constitutional understanding as they decide cases.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Assess The Power Of Judicial Review Pros And Cons

786 Words | 4 Pages

Madison, judicial review is the power of the judicial branch to declare statutes, actions, and bureaucratic agencies of the government at any level unconstitutional, and its main purpose is to check and balance the other two branches. This function is not purely a review of lower level courts by the Supreme Court. However, this power has been questioned due to its lack of direct coverage in the Constitution. Judicial review is also believed to be a conflict of interest, provided that Supreme Court Justice John Marshall ruled in favor of the courts. Judicial review is and has been controversial in the past because of how politically powerful it can be.

Read More

Difference Between Constitutionalism And Originalism

320 Words | 2 Pages

Essay Two – Daniel Astleford Jeremy Christensen spoke extensively about the difference between Originalism and Living Constitutionalism. I want to discuss the similarities and differences of these two points of view and then take a stance on which I think is more valid. Originalism says that the Constitution should only be changed through the amendment process. The amendment process is extremely thorough. In fact, there have been thousands of proposed amendments, but only a few have made it through the process to become law.

Read More

Key Constitutional Concepts By Leonore Annemore Annenberg Institute For Civics

644 Words | 3 Pages

The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics video titled “Key Constitutional Concepts” explores the history of the creation of the United States Constitution in addition to key concepts crucial to the document. Two central themes explored in the video include the protection of personal rights and importance of checks and balances. The video strives to explain these concepts through Supreme Court cases Gideon v. Wainwright and Youngstown v. Sawyer. To begin, the video retraces the steps leading up to the Constitutional Convention in Virginia in 1787. It opens by explaining the conflict that led to the Revolutionary War and the fragility of the new nation.

Read More

Realism Vs Originalism Essay

637 Words | 3 Pages

As both Nadine Strossen and Floyd Abrams pointed out, modern First Amendment jurisprudence doesn’t flow naturally from originalism. Or as their fellow

Read More

What Is The Difference Between Check And Balances

348 Words | 2 Pages

It is the power of the judicial branch of government to examine any government action and

Read More

Justice Thurgood Marshall Analysis

1324 Words | 6 Pages

Justice Thurgood Marshall Response Justice Thurgood Marshall said in his “Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution”, “I do not believe the meaning of the Constitution was forever ‘fixed’ at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, that we hold as fundamental as today” (Marshall). In this passage of his essay, Judge Marshall is critical of the government that is

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

Read More

Advantages Of Textualism

733 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand, it allows the judge to solely interpret the text which may cause him or her to put their own view on what they are interpreting like any normal person would. Antonin Scalia is a Harvard Law School graduate who served as the Assistant Attorney General for presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, who was later appointed by Ronald Reagan as a judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He is responsible for developing the method of textualism. He states that “Strict constructionism is a degraded form of textualism that brings the whole philosophy [of textualism] into disrepute.” This means that judges should not interpret the constitution too closely and should be deciding what the phrases as a whole, not just the words, mean.

Read More

More about Framers Vs Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document