Who was Franz Boas, and what was his influences on racialism and what was he trying to accomplish through the usage of methodology; was he successful in his ventures. Franz Boas was a German-American anthropologists and pioneer of modern anthropology who has been called the “Father of American Anthropology”. This gentleman was born to be a philosopher from the time he was born, for he grew up learning to love books; for he was a natural at reading and loved to learn about natural science. Over the years, Boas took on many different challenges from working in museums, to teaching anthropology at different universities around the world in regards to “race” and anthropology; as well as introducing Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to which …show more content…
Because of his believes Boas wanted outsider to look at each race individually not as a whole, and come up with their own reactions as to what they found compared to what we classify as social standards during that time in history during the nineteenth century. However, things soon changed, and during the twentieth century things took on yet another turn for anthropologists, for they believed that their “race” unlike any other; was above the rest. “This is known as racialism, the belief that there are distinctive biological “races” and that one can rank and categorize superior and inferior biological “races” within the human species” (Scupin, 2012, pg. 4). It was then that everything about “race”, ethnicity, and culture made perfect sense, for those earlier miss-conceptions that were outdated by those critiques no longer was being considered, for anthropologists now had information that obtained actual and detailed facts. One of those known critiques was Franz Boas, a well-educated young man that loved anthropology and loved to study different cultures abroad; such as those living in the …show more content…
Meaning his contributions were right on key, for he took his research and categorized our originality as to race, and provided us the information needed as to his beliefs, that racialism should be divided into different groups when considering our biological traits. However, many people today’s society disagree with Boas finding saying that this classification only creates hatred, known as racism, and feel that they are in a class all to the own; which is superior to others. Because of this reality many races today are being miss-treated, shun upon, bullied; just because they possess a different understanding as to Boas theory. His theory was design for us to realize that each of us are unique, and different in many shapes and forms; whether it be through our color, size, features, behavioral traits; or speech. Unfortunately, people miss-understood what Boas was trying to unveil, and took it upon themselves to make judgements; instead of looking as to what he uncovered that no one else could. He showed us that although he once believed “that his race was superior, and that no one is above the rest” (Scupin, pg. 5), one thing is certain we all were put on this earth by one person and one person only our creator and
If there is no biological basis for race, then it is clear race is created by human for their own purpose. Racial ideas are manifested in social inequality and unfair distribution. One of the factors of race is racial classification. The article of Colorblind challenges
Strahan’s lineage was constructed through white and black descent, defying the odds of Charles Davenport’s dihybrid cross experiments and societal stereotypes, as Strahan completed his goal of playing in the NFL through years of hard work and discipline. These conclusions align with Franz Boas’ idea that race is a social construct as he observed the capability of all different races on his journey across the world (The Invention of Race). I believe Boas’ idea that the power of science should outweigh prejudices is evidently clear through Strahan’s story as he defied the odds of numerous societal stereotypes. In the end, Strahan felt like he belonged, and he recognized that he “comes from this line of people who have paved the way for [him]” (“Freedom Tales,” Season 5 Episode 5, 41:32-41:36). Strahan mentioned both biological and cultural traits dismantling prejudices that have laid the foundation for racist ideologies perpetuated by
In his quote, “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have the right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever, and tho'
Ignorance of actual science is not a proof of racism. He knew at the time that most of the black race was more uneducated than the whites and therefore would not qualify for the holding of office, jury duty, or holding of a political office. He indicated that no man, woman or child he had ever met wanted a perfect equality. However, with time he began to push for voting rights for educated blacks. Basically, to understand the meaning of his remarks they need to be viewed from the time in history and political climate in which they were said.
He continued to explain that white and black people, in America, come from different backgrounds, they both share the same origins. Therefore, America denying black people rights granted to all humans is immoral. His second claim is that white people separate black people from humanity in
Scientific reasons for race and how it doesn’t correlate to race is shown in Document 5 that different human species should be divided into four groups based on their alleged characteristics and mark themselves with certain things like paints or garments. The document is trying to explain race and categorization of races through the people’s supposed characteristics and only using four groups, proving the correlation between race and scientific reasoning doesn’t work. Also, in Document 10, it’s explained that the four race categories are all “degenerate” forms to “God’s original creation,” and were classified biologically into different groups who were non-Caucasian. This document also explains that race and scientific reasoning does not correlate because it talks about how other races are “downgraded” versions of white and just split them into groups just by looks using colors, creating these unrealistic races with colors, without taking into account any physical scientific reasoning, proving there’s no correlation between race and scientific reasoning, that it was just led on by social and economic reasons. Lastly, in Document 11’s section, it explains that race doesn’t explain human variation and that us humans have a
This idea of noble selfishness makes him go as far as denouncing the word we as “a monster”, and worshipping “This god, this one word: I”(97). His transition is complete with this refocusing of his mind from worship of the group, to his new god,
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution i.e. “survival of the fittest” and the “process of natural selection“, was written in 1859 and was a theory based on the behaviour of animals. This theory was adapted by Herbert Spencer and resulted in the ideology that is known today as Social Darwinism. The latter is based on Darwin’s theory but instead of being based on animal behaviour it is applied to humans. It implied that certain races were superior to others because of their technological advancements. This lead people to believe that certain races, such as white/European people, were the “fittest” of all the races.
Among anthropologists it has become increasingly clear that the concept of race having a biological basis is fundamentally flawed. There a number of flaws with this concept of race. One issue is that features attributed to race, such as skin color, very across the globe in a clinal fashion rather than in uniform groups. Another issue is that there is more in-group variation within races than there is variation between races. Finally, human variation is non-concordant.
In other words, race is understood differently around the world. According to the text book, in West Africa, people are categorized into racial groups based on the status of having noble ancestry and not physical features. Also, according to the article, “Defining Race”, race is categorized base on individuals’ social class status and wealth. Furthermore, the invention of race reflects social, economic, and political aspects in society. For example, White American who has white and black ancestry will be considered as black because black slaves are free source of labor, and white population want to increase the number of labor.
This concept is so important because the whole point of this experiment was to teach this third grade class that the race of an individual does not determine who they are or how they should be treated. For instance, by splitting her third grade classroom into two different groups based on eye color, Elliot was essentially creating two different races. What she was teaching is that while differences do exist between people, these differences do not define who these people are. Students learned that their eye color does not matter. A person is still a person, blue-eyed or brown-eyed, and should be treated equally.
Critical thinking questions: physical anthropology textbook 1. Given that you’ve only just been introduced to the field of physical anthropology, why do you think subjects such as skeletal anatomy, genetics, nonhuman primate behavior, and human evolution are integrated into a discussion of what it means to be human? The study of physical anthropology integrates the subjects of skeletal anatomy, genetics, nonhuman primate behavior, and human evolution because anthropologists look to the fossilized remains of hominins to see what their environments were like and what they ate. In addition to these sub fields, anthropologists look to skeletal anatomy to see any evolutionary change or if the hominin had died from any diseases and how old and tall
“Tale From the Jungle: Margaret Mead”, youtube videos, which was introduced by Professor Ana, humanities professor, are a six long clip video documentaries of the first anthropology’s discoveries ever brought to public, the Samoan civilization. This ‘Samoan civilization’ anthropology discovery was discovered by Mead Margaret, an American female anthropologist, and later by Derek Freeman, an Australian anthologist. According to Mead Margaret, an American female anthropologist, she believes that humans are influenced by nurture. On the other side, Derek Freeman, an Australian anthologist, opposes Mead Margaret’s idea. He believes that humans are influenced by nature.
Introduction The concept of identity has been a notion of significant interest not just to sociologists and psychologists, but also to individuals found in a social context of perpetually trying to define themselves. Often times, identities are given to individuals based on their social status within a certain community, after the assessment of predominant characteristics that said individual has. However, within the context of an ethnicity, the concept identity is most probably applied to all members of the ethnical group, and not just one individual. When there is one identity designated for the entire group, often times the factor of “individuality” loses its significance, especially when referring to the relationship between the ethnic
One can no longer form his or her opinion of something if he or she knows nothing about it. One can no longer judge someone based on the color of their skin without knowing that person’s personal values. There are countless terrifying problems that face the world today. It is trivial that something as petty as race can get in the way of that. There is only one race: the human