10/27/15 Henry David Thoreau is known as one of the most influential writers of all time. His ideology is idolized by many writers including Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In civil disobedience, Thoreau expresses his strong dislike for the United States government and his opposition to slavery and the Mexican War. Thoreau believes everyone has the responsibility to fight against unjust laws. He spent a night in jail because he refused to pay taxes to support the Mexican war. About a century later, Dr. King, inspired by Thoreau exercised civil disobedience to fight for justice for African Americans. After reading Dr. King’s “letter from Birmingham Jail, one can conclude that he has been strongly inspired by Thoreau. Although both authors believe …show more content…
Thoreau uses an aggressive and assertive tone to call his readers to action. He starts his essay by attacking the government and criticizing many of its policies. He declares, “That government is best which governs not at all” (WOI, 305). He goes on to write, “yet this government never of itself furthered… has not sometimes got in its way” (WOI, 306). Thoreau perceives the government as being useless. He gets the reader’s attention by aggressively attacking the government. Dr. King, on the other hand, is much calmer and patient. Unlike Thoreau, Dr. King urges the reader to obey just laws. He writes, “one has not only a legal but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (WOI, 382). Dr. King is calling for civil disobedience for unjust laws only, unlike Thoreau who tells the readers to distance themselves from the government if they find some of its laws or policies to be unjust. Thoreau’s essay is more like a call to action speech. His aggressive tone works because by showing that the government is useless he is able to convince the readers to distance themselves from the government. He gives the readers reasons to disassociate themselves from the government. Even though Dr. King thinks that Justice for African Americans has been “too long delayed”, he is still very patient in “letter from …show more content…
They believed that every human being has the responsibility to disobey unjust laws and be willing to accept the punishment for their civil disobedience. Thoreau writes “the only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (WOI, 206). Later on Thoreau mentions a time when he spent a night in jail because he refused to pay his taxes. He states, “I saw that there was a stone… of all my townsmen had paid my taxes” (WOI, 316). He believes he has performed his civil duty because he did what he thinks is right. Thoreau refused to pay his taxes because he opposed the Mexican War; even though the Mexican war is not unjust to him personally, he refused to pay taxes to support it knowing that he could go to jail for it. Similarly, Dr. King fought for justice in Birmingham even though he does not live there. He thinks that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice anywhere” (WOI, 378). The injustice in Birmingham does not affect him directly, but he feels he has the responsibility to fight for justice in Birmingham because it is a threat to justice everywhere else. Dr. King ended up getting arrested doing so. He explains, “one who breaks an unjust law… is in reality expressing the highest respect for law” (WOI, 384). Dr. King believes he is exercising his civil duty by fighting for justice in Birmingham. Like Thoreau,
In the article “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Martin Luther King Jr. responds to clergymen who described his civil rights activities as “unwise and untimely”. Dr. King argues that while just laws should be obeyed, unjust laws aren’t binding because they go against decent morality and they degrade human lives. He explains the three-hundred-year struggles by African Americans to gain their basic rights and responds to criticism of being an extremist for trying to force change on this matter. Ultimately his reasoning is that those attempting to find a resolution to the injustice and unequal laws of the land should not be punished if they are doing so nonviolently, even if they break some just laws. I argue in favor of this idea that unjust laws
Thoreau and M.L.K Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”, published in 1849, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, published in 1963, have profound similarities while still having underlying differences. The one of the most distinct similarities in “Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” is the choice of action both authors decide to use, nonviolent measures, and who they are protesting against, which is government and its actions. On the same note, both essays express the dissatisfaction in the average white citizen’s acceptance for the status quo on slavery and then segregation. For example, both essays have a strikingly similar sentence; King states, “I had hoped that the white moderate
f one followed the similarities of King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience," they would notice that King may have been somewhat influenced by Thoreau's essay. The two essays also have many differences that are evident throughout analysis of the two essays that divide individual interpretation of each text. But it is obvious that the overall purpose of these two essays is to persuade the audiences that civil disobedience is necessary if there is social injustice in the government that governs over people.
Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King had experience with civil disobedience. They were both arrested for peacefully protesting laws they found unfair. Thoreau was put in prison for refusing to pay a poll tax, and was ultimately protesting slavery. King, on the other hand, was put in jail for protesting the unjust treatment of blacks and other colored people across America. Though the circumstances were slightly different, King and Thoreau use many of the same techniques to appeal to their audiences.
In Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s letter to fellow clergy after he was arrested for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. Martin Luther King not only talks about his views on the reaction of people who are considered lower class but ones who also have a higher rank. Dr. King explains that he believes that there were many unjust reasons that he was placed in jail, but also understood his consequences of his actions. We as Americans not only African Americans but all races from then to this day and age now still commend and respect all of the sacrifices Dr. King made. Although today he would be disappointed as we witness everything he fought for arise again at this time. Dr. King described the difference between just and unjust laws
On the other hand, King describes unjust law as the opposite, demoralizing to humanity, against moral law, and create a false sense of superiority and inferiority. King uses the denial of the black community to vote as an example, as it denied the control for blacks and was created as a way to have whites as the main voice in society. King says that unjust laws should be broken openly, lovingly, and accepting of the penalties that one would face. Breaking an unjust law was a demand for change and standing up for morality. King explains that this kind of civil disobedience was never new.
The government's flawed state can be corrected by the action of an individual. Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience heavily reinforces this idea by presenting novel concepts regarding the role, responsibilities, and options of individuals, as they pertain to government, throughout the course of the text. The text was written in 1894 during the time of the Mexican American war when the US government, and the people it represented, found itself in a turbulent, uncertain state. Thoreau’s mission was to inform other transcendentalists and civilians in the United States about the actions they could and should have taken against government when unacceptable forms of rule arose. Although many Americans believed achieving reform was impossible through the actions of individuals, Thoreau’s belief was that independent and just strides could be enough to make considerable change; this becomes clear when Thoreau says, “It is not as important that many should be as good as you, as that may be some absolute goodness, for that will leaven the lump”
King writes to the eight clergymen who were critical of his protests and to the indifferent people of the United States. In the essay, he claims that he has done nothing wrong by protesting peacefully. In paragraph 11, King says “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” He is saying that freedom is something they have to fight for because the authorities will not give it to them. He is directing this statement at the clergymen while reaching the apathetic people of the United States.
Is censorship, even of bigoted or incendiary material, an appropriate use of civil disobedience? First of all, before answering this question, you need a better understanding of what civil disobedience means. Well, civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government, or of an occupying international power. To put it in simpler terms, it’s nonviolent resistance.
The goal in going to prison is making the unfair laws public and calling more attention to them. Thoreau speaks out on how important it is to protest these unfair laws and how breaking them is a form of protest. In Letter From a Birmingham Prison, King writes about how he was arrested for peaceful protest. He was protesting the unfair laws and treatment against African Americans.
Social injustices have always been an issue in the United States, and still is an issue today. “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau talked about the social injustices they saw, and how they acted towards them. Although Martin Luther King Jr., and Henry David Thoreau saw different social injustices at different times in history, they both stood up for what they believed in, without thinking of the consequences. Both Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau spent time in jail for their battle of social injustice. King spent time in jail for protesting how unfairly African-Americans were being treated in Birmingham, Alabama.
Thoreau’s essay focuses on his belief that the individual has the right and the duty to protest unjust laws or an unjust government. He even spent the night in jail because he refused to pay the poll tax in order to protest the Mexican American War. Thoreau’s night in jail was the inspiration for his reasoning that “There will never be a really free and enlightened State, until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are deviated, and treats him accordingly.” (Thoreau 1872). He believed in the power of the individual as an essential part of the State and that “a single man can bend [the government] to his will.”
Thoreau 's views on the government by comparing the government to a machine. He states, ”When the machine was producing injustice, it was the duty of conscientious citizens to be ‘a counter friction’ (i.e., a resistance) "to stop the machine.” The two major issues being debated in the United States during his life was slavery and the Mexican-American War in which were major reasons he wrote his essays. In the mid to late 1840’s slavery has been indoctrinated into American society in which caused rifts between Americans.
Henry David Thoreau was an extremely influential writer of his time. He helped inspire the American transcendental movement as well as urge a nonconformist attitude to many Americans. This nonconformist idea is what left him in the woods at Walden Pond for two years while he tried to embody Emerson's idea of self-reliance. Throughout history, he continued to be an influence especially when it came to the fight for change and for revolution in fighting. His essay, Civil Disobedience, embodied a non violent resistance as the way to fight, In later years, several incredible people such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Junior used these ideas to encourage their successful nonviolent movements.
Many people watch the news every day, and some wonder why they aren’t in Washington making laws that would be more beneficial to their lives. Unfortunately, that’s not how the government runs now or ever did. Henry Thoreau believes that no citizen should give in to the government, if they don’t agree with an unjust law or statement. He uses methods such as the right of revolution or basic human rights, and protest, to resist a corrupt and over-reaching government. Thoreau strongly believes that every man has the right to express their feelings about the government in any form or fashion.