ipl-logo

Henry Drummond Inherit The Wind

452 Words2 Pages

To every story there are at least two sides; for any considered conclusion a fact must have a contradiction. Moreover, arguments follow in tow. Henry Drummond in Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, displays the significance to Creationism and Darwinism in tandem. For either side to appropriately stay considered they must correlate with opposition. For an argument to be substantial and taken seriously, it must have debatable opposition and equal representation. Throughout Inherit the Wind, Henry Drummond demands equal representation in hopes of keeping the trial fair. Because Drummond supports the unfavorable stance in the court case, he and his position are at odds against the religious town. By demanding equal representation and status, Drummond establishes the importance of unbiased representation;“The use of this title prejudices the case of my client; it calls up a picture of the prosecution, astride a white horse, ablaze in the uniform of a militia colonel, with all the forces of right and righteousness marshalled behind him” (Lawrence and Lee 1 2 113-116). When Drummond calls out Matthew Brady and his appointed title, he delivers evidence of bias against his client and case. Consequently, by demanding a fair and equal change in titles, Mr. Drummond discerns to the town that the case must …show more content…

By placing the two cherished books into his personal briefcase, Henry Drummond exhibits the importance of both books’ existence. One must be able to question their environment to reach true conclusions for themselves, “The man who has everything figured out is probably a fool… it takes a very smart fella to say “I don’t know the answer”(1 2 414-417). Laying side by side the literature symbolizes the necessity of the contradicting volumes; because the subjects persist debatability and can equally support the argument and remain

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Inherit The Wind By Jerome Lawrence And Robert E. Lee

    889 Words  | 4 Pages

    It takes a powerful man to captivate and change the minds of an entire town. In Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s Inherit the Wind, Henry Drummond is this man. Bertram Cates is accused of illegally teaching evolution, and Henry Drummond is called in to defend him against the prosecution, Matthew Harrison Brady. Ultimately, Cates is convicted, but the town becomes more open-minded and supports free thinking. Henry Drummond’s virtue, eloquence, and kindness enable him to make a case for man’s right to think.

    Read More

  • The Scopes Monkey Trial In Inherit The Wind By Robert E. Lee

    1052 Words  | 5 Pages

    When the judge exclaims that the right to think is not on trial, Drummond expresses: “with all respect to the bench, I hold that the right to think is very much on trial! It is fearfully I’m dangerously in the proceedings of this court!”(Lawrence and Lee 72). Drummond’s confidence allows him to acknowledge to the courtroom that the right to think is on trial. Cates expressing his beliefs with Drummond supporting him,

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Jerome Lawrence And Robert E. Lee's Inherit The Wind

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    Henry Drummond: A Devil in the Courtroom In Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, the defending attorney Henry Drummond clearly impacts the society of Hillsboro more than any other character in the play because of his ability to manipulate the citizens of the society and his decision to question the prosecuting attorney as a witness. First, Henry Drummond impacted the society of Hillsboro the most because of his strong ability to persuade and manipulate the jury in the trial and the citizens of Hillsboro. For example, in Act 2, Scene 2, Drummond starts with asking Brady easy, light-hearted questions, but then quickly brings more difficult-to-answer and draws the crowd in, “DRUMMOND: Do you ever think about things that you

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Inherit The Wind And Scopes

    433 Words  | 2 Pages

    Finally, Drummond and John Neal were the defense attorneys for Scopes (John Neal) and Cates (Drummond). Drummond was a character most would say looked like the devil, or was an atheist because they thought he fully supported evolution and disregarded the Bible. —To only find out that he was more religious than his witness Colonel Brady himself. Drummond speaking to Hornbeck after the trial quotes Proverbs 11:29 “He that troubleth his own house shall inherit only wind, and the fool will be servant to the

    Read More

  • Fear During The Scopes Trial

    929 Words  | 4 Pages

    He uses diction, in this case, human virtues to lure the jury into siding with the defendant. He believes “It is not often that a case is submitted to twelve men where the decision may mean a milestone in the progress of the human race. But this case does. And, I hope and I trust that you have a feeling of responsibility... as citizens of a great nation…” (“People V. Henry Sweet” par 30).

    Read More

  • Characterization In Inherit The Wind

    2129 Words  | 9 Pages

    Characterization in Inherit the Wind ​Written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, the play Inherit the Wind is a fictitious spin off of the historical Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, which hotly debated the concept of evolutionism vs. creationism and, in general, a person’s right to think. In the play, a young man by the name of Bert Cates is prosecuted for teaching evolution in school and breaking the state’s “creation-only” law. His case is taken to court where he fights against the highly exalted paragon of religious devotion, Matthew Harrison Brady. Henry Drummond, an almighty but rather infamous attorney, stands by and defends Cates throughout the whole trial. In the midst of this all, Cates’ lover, Rachel Brown, is torn between her love

    Read More

  • The Power Of Mysteries By Alan Barger Analysis

    511 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lightman and Barger immediately draw their reader in by questioning the norm and present questions that no one can answer. Each one of these challenge the reader to think on a deeper and a more personal level. Alan Lightman’s “The Power of Mysteries” and Allan Barger’s “I Could Be Wrong” have given me the opportunity to realize that the unknown drives us to answer new questions and that accepting being wrong can bring humility and a greater understanding of a

    Read More

  • Summary Of Evolution As Fact And Theory By Stephen Jay Gould

    340 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article “Evolution as Fact and Theory” Stephen Jay Gould who is one of the leading theorists in evolution argues that the debate between evolutionists and creationists is pointless since creationists’ arguments lack support and evidence. Gould writes that creationists’ main argument is that evolution is only a theory. However, Gould states that it is not only a theory but also a fact. He suggests that humans evolved from apelike— whether or not is happened by Darwin’s mechanism. What Gould is saying is that there is more than enough evidence to support the theory of evolution and the question that scientists are trying to answer is how exactly all living organisms are linked.

    Read More

  • Was Darwin Wrong David Quammen Analysis

    1156 Words  | 5 Pages

    Over the eras, many scientists have expressed concerns with Darwin's evolution theory and in "Was Darwin Wrong?" by David Quammen one can learn about the proof behind the theory of evolution. Many people do not believe in evolution due to an overall unawareness about the theory and religious upbringing. However, Quammen clarifies the truth behind evolution in his article. The article states five positions of evidence biogeography, embryology, morphology, paleontology, and the bacterial resistance to antibiotics discovered in humans.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of 1860 And The Scopes Monkey Trial

    1302 Words  | 6 Pages

    To assume that the Wilberforce-Huxley debate of 1860, and the Scopes “Monkey” Trial of 1925 are even remotely similar in their actual arguments is to fall prey to decades of intentional propaganda. Both of these events are continuously set up as groundbreaking struggles between science and religion that ended in the latter being dealt a crushing blow. Yet in reality, during neither event was either topic the sole focus. Both the 19th century debate and the 20th century trial have been warped by contemporary and future writers alike into similar molds that stray far from the truth. Though from the outset they bear some similarities, any amount of in depth research reveals the simple fact that neither case fits into the commonly held views.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Abusing Science By Philip Kitcher

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    Philip Kitcher in “Abusing science: The case against creationism” argues about how creationists have motives in which they want to show that the theory of evolution are just lies. They will pick on every theory they find and claim them as untestable. The author states that creationist use tautology objection, which means that whatever the evolution theory is it cannot be tested and is classified as not real science. The author hen states that creationist do not thoroughly understand what their objections borrowed from evolutionist really mean. All they do is get whatever information makes sense to them and turn it around to a point in which will justify their point of view against evolutionist.

    Read More

  • Why Is Charles Darwin Controversial

    388 Words  | 2 Pages

    Best known for his contributions to the evolutionary theory, Charles Robert Darwin was an English scientist that made revolutionary discoveries. In Darwin’s publication 1859, On the Origin of Species, he established that all species are descended from a common ancestor, changed by mutations and natural selection, despite battling much controversy. By the 1870s, Darwin had most of the community accepting evolution as a fact. Despite that statement, his discoveries are still widely controversial. Many religious people do not believe in the Theory of Evolution because it contradicts the beliefs of creation.

    Read More

  • Should Creationism Be Taught In Schools Essay

    966 Words  | 4 Pages

    Scientists across various fields of studies with excellent academic achievements voice their unwavering belief in the theory of creation, and they depict multiple experiments and studies to solidify the validity of creationism. Evolution versus creationism is a battle that began long before today’s modern trials and protests, yet the same basic principles still exist. Creationism is as scientific as evolution, and evolution is as faith-based as

    Read More

  • Charles Darwin's Influence On Religion

    349 Words  | 2 Pages

    The theory of Darwin was seen to many Religious followers as denying the existence of God and creations. The religious followers believed that God created the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Creationism

    1666 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Evolutionism or Creationism Debate The evolutionism-reationism debate has been going on for centuries among christians and scientists. However, creationism is said to have more logical proof of their points being the strongest. According to Charles Darwin, Natural selection is the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin, and it is now regarded as be the main process that brings about evolution.

    Read More

More about Henry Drummond Inherit The Wind

Open Document