Ironies in The False Gems D01夏春雨 As an active form of literature device,irony involves a discrepancy between what is anticipated to be true and what is actually true.Irony is used throughout Guy de Maupassant’s The False Gems.Next,I’ll analysis some of them. Mr.Lantin found fault with only two of his wife’s tastes:Her love for the theatre,and her taste for imitation jewelry.May be Mr.Lantin doesn’t like theatre himself,or maybe he think going to theatre is the waste of money,so he doesn’t want his wife to go to theatre.He doesn’t like his wife’s taste of imitation jewelry because he thinks that as she can’t afford to buy real jewelry,she should appear adorned with her beauty and modesty alone.Ironically,if Mr.Lantin knew the truth of Mrs.Lantin’s love of the theatre and the “imitation jewelry”,he would not just consider them as faults,and he would be very angry with her. Mrs.Lantin agreed to go theatre without obliging her husband to accompany her,and it made Mr.Lantin infinite delighted.Mr.Lantin’s absence gave a chance to Mrs.Lantin to start her affair.If Mr.Lantin knew this,he would not be delighted. “Mrs.Lantin lavished the most delicate attentions on her husband,coaxed and fondled him.”It seems Mrs.Lantin loved her husband very much,but her behaviors which contain her “love” are just used to make Mr.Lantin love her so that he couldn’t perceive her affair. “What can I do?I am so fond of jewelry.It is my only weakness.We cannot change our
With Martin, she only ever stuck to the duties a woman normally sticks to, but Arnaud is a merchant. When a woman’s husband is a merchant, she is allowed to engage in merchant activities as well, thus with Arnaud Bertrande’s sphere of freedom expands. She gets more opportunities to experience the world around her aside from the normal confinement a woman has to her house. Bertrande seizes this chance for independence to the fullest, and “What Bertrande had with the new Martin was her dream come true,” (44). For not only does she get more freedom with him by being a merchant, but she also fulfils her previous more mature independent desire for a partner she genuinely likes.
Irony is present in everyday life. It has become the crux of thousands of jokes, remarks and even the media. Thousands of stories include irony in them in the form of ironic twists, characters, and plotlines. The irony in stories is often sidelined or overlooked; however, it can be so much more. In “The Veldt”, it is, in fact, a large part of the story.
Acting childishly, Lizabeth throws rocks at and taunts Miss Lottie, but afterwards, she begins to realize the impact of her actions. Lizabeth reflects, “Suddenly I was ashamed, and I did not like being ashamed. The child in me sulked and said it was all in fun, but the woman in me flinched at the thought of the malicious attack that I had led” (Collier 448). The narrator acts immaturely towards Miss Lottie, and it is evident that she has not yet grown into maturity due to the childish nature of her acts. The first-person point of view showcases Lizabeth’s internal conflict between “the child in [her],” and “the woman in [her],” and the reader can observe the narrator begin to feel regret and comprehend the effects of her actions.
Likewise, de Maupassant’s “The Jewels” introduces us to Madame Lantin, who was married off to Monsieur Lantin to improve her life. Her seemingly virtuous and innocent appearance became the main
She effectively conveys her message through the detailed descriptions of Lanval and the conflicts he encounters. Her use of enchantment as a narrative tool highlighted the contrast between social constraints and individual desires. In addition, Lanval’s love for the mysterious fairy tale lady represents the power of true love. The way she combines these elements helps her communicate her message and keeps the readers engaged in thinking about today’s social expectations and one’s personal satisfaction. Reading Lanval provided valuable insights into the author, Marie de France, and the period of medieval writing.
Sometimes for some people all most falling to their death, or just pushing their limits maybe the way to show themselves what is most important in life. This is what happens to the main character in "Contents of the Dead Man's Pocket" by Jack Finney. In the story, Tom goes through ten minutes of pain, guilt, life changes and dangerous obstacles that he over faced about life. In this story Tom Benecke has two choices go with his wife Clare to the movies or stay home and pretend to do some work for his job.
In his story Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose uses verbal irony to portray how not everyone is made out how they should be. In doing so, he asks the readers to question why people are deeper than their first impression. The verbal irony used in Rose’s story illustrates the deeper meaning of things that every day go unnoticed. Upon first examination the reader wouldn’t think anything of the fact that Juror 11 corrects Juror 10 because “he don’t even speak good English;” however, as the reader continues to analyze, they figure out that ironically Juror 11 is an immigrant that can speak better English than Juror 10, who was born in this country (Rose 37).
Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” is an example of how archetypal irony can shape an entire work. Gregor Samsa our main character is not concerned at all with his own personal wellbeing when he awakes to discover this twist. He is concerned with the inconvenience that it may have on those around him. Even through his death we see the truth behind those who he is most concerned with, which in itself is ironic. Irony is first seen when a man wakes up to find that a cruel twist of fate has turned him into a giant beetle.
The main conflict in “The Necklace” is when Madame Loisel and her husband must find a way to pay for a diamond necklace that Madame Loisel borrows from her friend but discovers that she lost in on the way back form a lavish ball. On page 190, du Maupassant says, “It was necessary to pay this frightful debt. They sent away the maid…now they knew the horrible life of necessity.” This quote shows how Madame Loisel had to adjust to her lifestyle in order to pay for the necklace that they buy to replace the lost necklace. The author uses this conflict effectively to create irony as it is revealed that the lost necklace was a fake and not
Readers can know the hero Monsieur Lantin can’t live life with his salary after his wife was dead,so why he earned the same salary, when his wife was alive, he can feed his wife and himself. But his wife was dead, he can 't afford the expense of family,even he has to sell off his possession for keeping a normal life. Therefore readers finally could know this is the evidence which prove his wife has been having an affair and satirizes his wife is disloyal and pretended. her husband’s meagre income leads to she can’t buy some beautiful gems and have a great life. So she chooses to betray her
He asserts his own will against the rules of the community and brings tragedy upon all of the families to which he belongs or to which he is dramatically connected. He is driven by deep passion, as his furious travels by horse to and from the Bride’s house demonstrate. Leonardo’s fateful decision to deny the bonds of matrimony in favor of his abiding desire for the Bride occurs only when the Bride is certain to be married to another. This suggests the manner in which Leonardo’s actions are motivated by possessiveness, where as long as the Bride belongs to no other, Leonardo can tolerate their separation. While Leonardo’s motivations are in certain respects selfish or possessive, and while he brings pain and suffering upon a number of persons, the play nevertheless generates a great deal of sympathy for his and the Bride’s
She was considered to be nice and perfect, like a genuine precious jewel, yet with rottenness and betrayal lying inside her soul. The title is such a profound phrase that it successfully pops a question into everyone 's head: what is real, what is false. If something possessed by Mrs. Lantin, a woman that was born poor and virtuous, was real treasure, what can be false? If someone like Mrs. Lantin, a woman that was hailed as the perfect woman, was a false gem, who can be
Originating in France, ‘The Necklace’ is a short story written by French writer Guy de Maupassant in the late nineteenth century, the period where literary movements realism and naturalism dominated French fiction. Maupassant played an important role in both the realist movement and the naturalist movement through his depiction of the setting as well as the character’s decision. The short story reflects upon the rigid patriarchal society during the late nineteenth century, demonstrating how the wealth of a person can lead to their generosity and greed; thus affecting their lifestyles. Through ‘The Necklace’, Maupassant aims to depict the conflicts between the upper-class and the lower class, how their inner desires vary. This essay will analyze ‘The Necklace’ and how Maupassant uses the social context, characters and literary devices in the short story to illustrate his misogynistic viewpoints towards women.
Love is a strong feeling that human beings have for each other; however, in life, love can either bring happiness or misery into one’s life. In the play Hedda Gabler, Ibsen portrays Hedda a woman who lives a miserable life with no hope—she does not love her husband, George Tesman. Instead, Hedda looking for a successful marriage filled with joy, with the man that she loves with all heart—Eilert Lovborg. As readers continue to read the play thoroughly, readers get the opportunity to recognize that Eilert is competent of offering Hedda a passionate and exciting marriage—George Tesman is unable to. Nonetheless, Hedda’s marriage is the epitome of a boring, miserable, and frustrating marriage.
“The Diamond Necklace” by Maupassant teaches how this clash defines society’s interactions with each other. Understanding the desire of the proletariat class to overcome the oppression caused by those who have control over them, will give more understanding to the relationship between the Loisels. Through the characteristic flaws shown by Matilda, Marxist theory is upheld. With Marx’s idea of how Capitalism works, class conflict, manipulation, and repression are exemplified through the characteristic conflicts that build and destroy the husband and wife’s relationship within the story, while helping them become one with each