In 1973, the Supreme Court made a historical decision that not only affected abortion rights, but also society. This decision changed the way women terminated their pregnancies. In addition, it made justices feel conflicted when deciding right from wrong. In 1970, the Supreme Court granted a certiorari where they later ruled in favor of Jane Roe and determined their majority, concurring and dissenting opinions in regards to the case. Before appealing the case to the Supreme Court, Jane Roe’s case had been granted a declaratory relief from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This meant that the district court had agreed with Roe that the law in Texas regarding abortion rights was unconstitutionally imprecise and violated Roe’s right to privacy under the ninth and fourteenth amendments. On the other hand, the district court did not authorize Roe an injunction that would allow her to terminate her pregnancy; therefore, violating …show more content…
Justice Harry A. Blackmun was chosen by the court to write the majority opinion. However, Blackmun argued that a majority opinion could not be decided yet because abortion rights were obscure in the constitution. In addition, the Court had not deliberated whether abortion was a fundamental right; therefore, Blackmun suggested that the court wait to rehear the case with all nine justices present to determine a definite opinion. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jane Roe and agreed that the Texas law was unconstitutional because women have the right to put an end to their pregnancy as guaranteed in the Due Process Clause, which secured the right to privacy. Overall, the Supreme Court stated that it was not in the interest of the state to make regulations regarding abortion rights in a woman’s first trimester of pregnancy and only licensed physicians were able to perform abortions under proper medical
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
CASE BRIEF Student's name : Elise Piallo and Sarah Rahmani • Case name : Roe v. Wade (Full name : Jane Roe, et al. v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County) • Citation : 410.US.113 (1973) • Fact of the case : Appellant Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) was a pregnant woman who wanted to obtain an abortion.
56. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989): The Court upheld Missouri restrictions on abortions that “public employees and public facilities were not to be used in performing or assisting abortions unnecessary to save the mother 's life; encouragement and counseling to have abortions was prohibited; and physicians were to perform viability tests upon women in their twentieth (or more) week of pregnancy.” It was a fractured decision that seemed to contradict Roe v. Wade but the court decided to not revisit any parts of Roe v. Wade after this case. The Missouri restrictions did not violate the right to privacy or the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
McCorvey ("Jane Roe"), claiming a Texas law criminalizing most abortions violated Roe 's constitutional rights. (PBS) The Court argued that the Constitution 's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments (Roe v. Wade The Abortion Rights Controversy in America History) protect an individual 's "zone of privacy" against state laws and cited past cases ruling that marriage, contraception, and child rearing are activities covered in this "zone of privacy." (PBS) In addition, this case was against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County from 1951 to 1987, who enforced a Texas law that prohibited abortion, except to save a woman 's life.
Prior to the case it was the state that determined the legality of abortions. Jane Roe, (alias), was an unmarried and pregnant Texas citizen in 1970. She wanted to have an abortion, but Texas abortion law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless “on medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” Roe filed suit against Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas to challenge the law outlawing abortion. At the time, many states had outlawed abortion except in cases where the mother’s life was in danger.
Wade argued that constitution did not guarantee women the right to an abortion, and that personal and marital privacy are not absolute rights. The final Supreme Court ruling was done on January 22nd of 1973. This was the date the Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade. The final court ruling was in favor of Roe the petitioner in a 7-2 decision. Roe won the case and this meant that the court handed the rights of privacy of a personal liberty to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy (Lewis,
Since the Roe vs Wade case in 1973, the issue of a woman’s decision to have an abortion has been legalized at the federal level. States do have the right to place restrictions on obtaining abortions. In 2013, Texas passed abortion clinic regulations that reduced the clinics in number from forty-one to nineteen. The right to life of an unborn child should be guaranteed and abortion should be outlawed. It is inhumane to end a defenseless human life if the mother’s life is not endangered.
Throughout history Planned Parenthood has been in the spotlight of the court. In 1973, the supreme court case Roe v. Wade made headlines when it “ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother” (McBride) The case was brought up by Jane Roe, who said that banning abortions was in direct violation with her 14th amendment right to privacy.
Roe filed a lawsuit on wade claiming that a Texas law was criminalizing majority of every abortion. During that time period abortion were really only considered if the pregnancy was considered life threatening to the mother. This court case still remains one of the most intensely debated cases making the House Bill 3994 stand out. With this bill come many different opinions with some highly though of voices claiming there thought on the bill. Some representatives think that the bill is covering all the loopholes and clarifying the rules for underage minors who wish to proceed with and abortion without the consent of parent or guardian but the consent of a judge while others are seeing the complication with constitutional rights and the right to privacy.
Roe wanted to terminate her pregnancy through abortion which was prohibited in the state of Texas unless it was to save the life of the pregnant woman. She challenged the law with her attorney Sarah Weddington, used the constitution to make strong argument for her client against the state of Texas concerning abortion. This case went all the way to the Supreme Court where the arguments for each side were heard twice. Weddington, Roe attorney not being strong in her first argument came back in the second argument with a big finish and made history.
Planned Parenthood v.Casey Sperberg, 4 Planned Parenthood v. Casey: Right to privacy Rebecca Sperberg Liberty High School AP Government 3AB Abortion has always been an underlying option for pregnant females. The well-known case Roe v. Wade established that women have the right to an abortion through the 14th Amendment and right to privacy (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015b). Ten years after Roe v. Wade legalized abortion the case known as Planned Parenthood v. Casey questioned Pennsylvania?s restrictions on abortions in 1988 and 1989.
On December 13, 1971, the Supreme Court decided to hear the arguments on Roe v. Wade, and another abortion case Doe v. Bolton. This case originally started on a night in August 1969. Norma McCorvey, also known as Jane Roe, was walking with her friends to a distant motel. She told her lawyer that they were attacked and McCorvey was raped. After thee incident, McCorvey left that place and went back to Dallas to live with a friend.
With almost half the nation divided among their views, abortion remains one of the most controversial topics in our society. Since Roe v. Wade, our views in society as well as following court cases have been progressing toward the woman’s right to choose. The precedent set by Roe v. Wade made the Supreme Court acknowledge that it cannot rule specifically when life begins and it also affirms that it is the woman’s right to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment. In the 1st Amendment, the Establishment Clause forbids the government from passing laws “which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another”. Many Christian pro-lifers use their religious beliefs to dispute when life begins.
It went to the Supreme Court and the laws were overturned in a 7-2 decision with Justices White and Rehnquist dissenting. This case was monumental because it effectively legalized abortion during the first trimester in the United States. Justice Harry Blackmun wrote the majority opinion in this case. In this opinion, he discussed the historical motives behind the type laws and the lack of current applicably of them or unconstitutionality. These motives were Victorian mores discouraging sexual promiscuity, the high mortality rate for mothers undergoing abortions and the interest of the State to protect life.
“On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, a challenge to a Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to safely and legally end her pregnancy. Siding with Roe, the court struck down the Texas law. In its ruling, the court recognized for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy “is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (Roe v. Wade, 1973).
The Court ruled that the states were forbidden from outlawing any aspect of abortion performed during the first trimester of pregnancy, could only enact abortion regulations reasonably related to maternal health in the second and third trimesters, and could enact abortion laws protecting the life of the fetus only in the third trimester (McBride). At the time Roe was decided, most states severely restricted or banned the practice of abortion. My thoughts on the abortion debate fall in between conservative and liberal views. I believe that women have aright to have an abortion under certain circumstances. If the mother needs an abortion to live it should be legal.