ipl-logo

Jane Roe On Abortion Essay

273 Words2 Pages

Jane Roe was pregnant and unmarried in the state of Texas in which it was illegal to receive an abortion unless her life is at stake. Roe said she has the right decide whether to have an abortion or not to have an abortion. According to the Court, privacy is important and one of the principal values of the Bill of Rights. C. Vote count 7-2. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment did not have the intent to protect privacy, and protect the decision-making of a woman. The reason why the court did this because the justice believes the state does have a reasonable reason for enforcing the law of rejecting abortion. It was a way to protect the health of the mother and the life of the baby. Even though it does not have an effect in the beginning; however, it gradually worsens as the baby grows older. D. Would the constitution accept women to have an abortion? …show more content…

I agree with the court’s decision because abortion is irrevocably bad. As a catholic and as a person, abortion is killing people, and by granting people the right to abortion is intentionally killing young people every day. Sometimes, it makes me wonder if they want themselves to live every day, then why kill? I know people have the freedom of doing what they believe is “right”; however, some people across the world are willing to have children, but can never have one. Even if you are poor or it’s against your family values, no one should give up a child and take their child’s life for

Show More
Related
104 Words | 1 Pages

A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).

Read More
1872 Words | 8 Pages

56. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989): The Court upheld Missouri restrictions on abortions that “public employees and public facilities were not to be used in performing or assisting abortions unnecessary to save the mother 's life; encouragement and counseling to have abortions was prohibited; and physicians were to perform viability tests upon women in their twentieth (or more) week of pregnancy.” It was a fractured decision that seemed to contradict Roe v. Wade but the court decided to not revisit any parts of Roe v. Wade after this case. The Missouri restrictions did not violate the right to privacy or the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Prior to the case it was the state that determined the legality of abortions. Jane Roe, (alias), was an unmarried and pregnant Texas citizen in 1970. She wanted to have an abortion, but Texas abortion law made it a felony to abort a fetus unless “on medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” Roe filed suit against Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas to challenge the law outlawing abortion. At the time, many states had outlawed abortion except in cases where the mother’s life was in danger.

Read More
1431 Words | 6 Pages

With the passing of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the controversy surrounding abortion only just begun, unlike what the justices hoped for. Throughout the following decades, a multitude of cases were presented to the courts surrounding the issue of abortion. While the issue of abortion has been debated thoroughly, individuals on both sides of the issue still voice their opinion in hopes to be heard and enact policy change. The job before the court today is to decide the constitutionality of SB 127 here in ACLU et al. v. DeWine.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

I formulated this decision comparing my stance on why having consensual sex should result in permission of the fetus to use a woman’s body. Consensual sex isn’t a necessary act of survival like walking outside would be. Consensual sex is merely based off on wanting to experience a form of pleasure. The need for this pleasure is a weak justification to deny usage of another body when the fetus requires it. In other words, you can completely cut consensual sex out of your life with ease, and avoid the controversy over allowing permission for a fetus to grow.

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.

Read More
1555 Words | 7 Pages

The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.

Read More
2032 Words | 9 Pages

The fact that it was a majority Conservative Supreme Court decision makes it easier to believe that the overturn was an inherently political decision. The so-called impartiality of rights comes into question when you see it through the political lens brought forward by Ingram. The issue of abortion, especially in America, is inherently political, and when it was overturned, this revealed the inherent flaw in using rights as a basis for justice. Although their ability to change over time is, in some cases, a pro, it is also not a redeemable quality. Because rights can change and are always changing, there is also a possibility that people's liberties are in danger of being taken away, as is shown by Roe v. Wade’s overturning.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

“This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment 's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment 's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman 's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” The justices felt that a woman 's right to privacy was more compelling than the right of states to regulate that right during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. There is no right to privacy explicitly guaranteed in the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court has long acknowledged some right to privacy.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The Court ruled that the states were forbidden from outlawing any aspect of abortion performed during the first trimester of pregnancy, could only enact abortion regulations reasonably related to maternal health in the second and third trimesters, and could enact abortion laws protecting the life of the fetus only in the third trimester (McBride). At the time Roe was decided, most states severely restricted or banned the practice of abortion. My thoughts on the abortion debate fall in between conservative and liberal views. I believe that women have aright to have an abortion under certain circumstances. If the mother needs an abortion to live it should be legal.

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

The rulings for abortion were made with the argument that keeping pregnancies would be, in certain circumstances, more injuries to life than

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Doris Gudino Professor Chounlamountry Political Science 1 27 July 2015 Pro-Choice Anyone? A woman has, undoubtedly, the freedom to procreate, but once a woman chooses to retreat from that freedom, a commotion arises. Abortion is a woman’s choice for many reasons. It’s her body, therefore, no one else can decide for said person.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

The court decision side with Roe stating that banning abortion is unconstitutional because the woman’s right to an abortion

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The motivations for anti-abortion laws varied from state to state. But in 1973 the supreme court “recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians. ”(Planned Parenthood Roe) This was called Roe v. Wade.

Read More
1324 Words | 6 Pages

The reason for the case in question is because Texas had a law prohibiting abortion unless the purpose was to save the mother’s life. Norma McCorvey wanted to have an abortion even though her life was not in danger. She claimed that this law violated her constitutional rights and that she should be able to have an abortion if she so desired to have one. Seven of the Supreme Court justices sided with her and declared that the law should be revoked. Abortion was ruled a “right to privacy” and the law was updated since then.

Read More

More about Jane Roe On Abortion Essay

Open Document