CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. The larval fish stages
Fish larvae are part of the fauna that eat smaller organisms. According to Leis and Ewart, (2000) they characterize larval stage to end with the fulfillment of full outside quantitative feature characters, the entry of any mobile structure. For the larval stage according to Termvidchakorn and Hortle, (2013) the larval stage can be divided into three which are yolk sac stage, pre-larval stage and post larval stage; whereas according to Leis and Ewart, (2000) the larval stage is divided into segment that outlined by formation of the caudal fin and flexion on the notochord. Ahlstrom and Ball, (1954) stated that the terminologies of the development stage of larval fish divided into yolk
…show more content…
Identification of fish larvae
Larval fish identification in this study was mainly depended on literature description and book. These guides are the compilation of the obtainable description of larval stages of fish around the world which are a guide to commonly occurring larval stages of fishes in Kenyan Coastal Waters by Mwaluma et al., (2014) and the larvae of Indo-Pacific Coastal fishes: An identification guide to marine fish larvae by Leis and Ewart, (2000).
There are 2 main characteristic used to identify fish larvae which include body and gut shape.
2.2.1. Body shape
Description and the body shape of fish larvae are very useful for identification (Leis and Ewart, 2000). The general shape of body that contains the body depth (BD) to body length (BL) is classified as follows:
Very elongated BD < 10% BL
Elongated BD 10-20% BL
Moderate BD 20-40% BL
Deep BD 40-70% BL
Very deep BD > 70% BL
The data to body shape are relative to the size which during the development body size may become smaller. Some structures become smaller during in the process growing to another stage.
2.2.3.
…show more content…
Costa et al. (2011) studied in fish larva community in an Amazonian estuary. All samples were collected in a 300 µm mesh conical cylindrical plankton net attached to a flow meter (hydro bios) and the net was towed through subsurface water horizontally for 5 minutes at a speed of 1.5 knots. Sample was removed from the net and fixed immediately in 4% formalin.
iv. Ara et al. (2014) collected fish larvae by using bongo nets with mesh size 500 µm, mouth diameter 0.3m and length 1.3m (Figure 2) in daylight. A flow meter (hydro-bios) was attached to the net in order to determine the volume of the water filtered. The bongo net, then towing 30 minute sub-surface from each station. Figure 2: Bongo net (mesh size 500 µm, mouth diameter 0.3m and length 1.3m).
v. Sukumaran et al., (2014) use a cast net measuring 2.5 m long, with a mesh size varying from 7 mm at the base and 15 mm at the apex was employed in the collection of fish throughout the period of study and the net was hauled 10 times during every collection at the sampling site.
vi. Mwaluma (2010) studied community structure and spatio-temporal variability of ichtyoplankton in Kenyan Coastal waters method use the light trap fabrication and deployment. The traps were deployed per tide during high tide at depth 10-18m for 12 hours. Figure 3: The locally fabricated light trap with original (with metal frames)
Everything To know About The Large Mouth Bass! Imagine fishing on a dock, or on a deep-sea boat. Imagine all the different of fish you can see or catch while you’re there. Lets put a little more thought into it!
And the smallest zooplankton (called micro‐zooplankton), fell by about 90 percent.” Finally, dissolved oxygen in the river dropped by 15
This net will have florescent orange floats fastened to the net at the top to keep the net held up in the water and to alert boats of the net. At the bottom of the net, it will have weights to keep it held down in the water. The maximum reported size of the long-snout seahorse is 6.9 inches (17.5 cm) in height (top of the coronet to the end of the stretched out tail). H. Reidi reaches maturity at approximately 3.1 inches (8 cm) in size. The squares in this burlap should be small enough to keep the seahorses in but allow small shrimp and plankton in and out to feed the seahorses.
The experiment was done by observing the Himantura leopard and Dasyatis Americana interactions with a school of fishinside a 760,000 gallon tank at the Adventure Aquarium for 90 minutes. There were two Himantura leopard organisms and approximately five to six DasyatisAmericana. A school of fish was observed as three fishes that are approximately three inches away from each other. When either species of stingray came within five inches of the described school of fish, it was marked down if any of the fishes in the school separated from the school by swimming in an opposing direction of the other fishes of the school. If a fish separated from the school, it was marked down as “break apart” for the specie of stingray that caused the separation.
An interesting feature of this lake is that it contains no large mouth predators of the fish. Normally, the spines of the fish keep them protected from these predators, but here in Bear Paw Lake, the spines actually decrease the fitness of the fish because the dragonfly larvae living at the lake bottom prey on the fish by grabbing them by their spines. Due to natural selection, eventually the fish in the lake population lost their spines on the undersides of their bodies.1 The fish that had low fitness due to their spines were killed and unable to produce offspring while those without spines or maybe with reduced spines lived long enough to
The purpose of this study is to understand the feeding rate of Daphnia magna. D. magna is a species of Daphnia that belongs to the suborder Cladocera (Ebert, 2005). They live in freshwater and feed on small, suspended particles in the surrounding water. They are filter feeders. Leaf-like appendages, called phyllopods provide a filtering apparatus for the collection of food.
The northern snakehead preys on zooplankton, smaller fish, fish larvae, crustaceans, frogs, insects, small reptiles, and even small mammals and birds. In the areas in which the northern snakehead has invaded, native populations are having gradual decreases because of the northern snakehead’s unextinguishable appetite. The most notable features of the northern snakehead fish are its snake-like characteristics. The fish has a long cylindrical body with the blotchy coloration and patterns of a snake.
Study Area Determining how water quality affects aquatic creatures includes large study areas. The watersheds of both the Chesapeake Bay and the New River are largely inclusive of multiple county boundaries. A larger study area makes it simpler to come by study samples, as fish are plentiful throughout. Protecting the quality of our watersheds is important because watersheds serve many purposes to both living and nonliving organisms.
The barbled dragonfish also has a size range of growing between 4 and 6 inches (Deep Sea Dragonfish. (n.d.)). They inhabit tropical ocean regions (Deep Sea Dragonfish. (n.d.)). They have unique structures to them that they are known for like their large sharp teeth with a protruding jaw and a long thread-like expansion from their epidermal layer at the base of their chin called a barbel (Spinal gap of barbeled dragonfishes mystery solved, 17 August 2010).
Longlining has many flaws that must be fixed in order to promote a healthier practice of fishing. The most damage of longlining is being done to the non-target species such as sea turtles, birds, dolphins, whales, and any of the other fish that happen to end up in the spread of a fifty mile longline. Studies have shown that the top predator fish in an ecosystem has decreased by over 90% in the past fifty years due to longline. A prime example of the negative effect that longlining has put on fish, is the average size decrease of the swordfish over the past 100 years. At 1900, the average swordfish weighed in at about 300-400 pounds.
We took a large net and set it vertically in the water, and then somebody got in the creek and kicked up sediment into the net. After doing this a few times, we collected all of the creatures off of the net and into an ice cube tray. We then examined the creatures and noted the variety (or lack thereof) of the creatures. The larger the variety in the species of the creek, the healthier the creek is. We noticed several species of fly larvae such as stone fly larvae and caddis fly larvae. We also noted a few worms.
Figure 2 demonstrated the difference in substrate composition between riffles and pools throughout the Kiamichi River and the results showed that the differences were caused by the different distribution of cobble and boulder substrates. This pointed out that the different substrate compositions could affect the habitat of the crayfish and determine where they live. Figure 3 was very important in understanding the conclusion of the experiment because it demonstrated that O.
The second group, the tilapiines, consists of the only substrate-spawning species in the lake (Tilapia rendalli), and four species of chambo