Lord Capulet To Blame For Romeo And Juliet's Death

802 Words4 Pages

The first person to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet is Lord Capulet because Lord Capulet being so strict about the person Juliet married, he leads a train of events causing the young Romeo and Juliet to commit suicide. Capulet wouldn't have been the only one to protest Romeo and Juliet's marriage, but he had the final say in Juliet life. Lord Capulet, “Send for the county. Go tell him of this. I'll have this knot knit up tomorrow morning” (4.2.23-24). If Lord Capulet never moved up the wedding, there would have been more time for the new to travel to Romeo. He taught was for the better family. It is Lord Capulet's fault because he is too protective over Juliet. Juliet could have just stood up and told him straight forward how she want …show more content…

He insults Romeo, but Romeo remains calm. Tybalt stab Mercuric and Romeo kill Tybalt. “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford no better term than this; thou art a villain” (3.1.55-56). “Thou wretched boy that didst consort him here, shalt with him hence” (3.1.123). If Tybalt did not kill Mercuric, then Romeo would not have to kill Tybalt, he wouldn’t have got banish in Verona. Tybalt is antagonist person in this book because he had to be selfish, hard headed and try to take Romeo's life. Romeo went to Capulet’s party and Tybalt recognize him and he’s going to expel Romeo to the party. He said to Lord Capulet, “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe; A villain, that is hither come in spite to scorn at our solemnity this night” (1.5.60-61). “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him” (1.5.74). If he wasn’t such a bad person he wouldn’t get so upset about Romeo going to the party when Romeo didn’t do anything but find his true love. If Tybalt wouldn’t have been so hard-headed everything could be fine. Tybalt is to blame for the tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet because he could have ended the situation without having a

Open Document